#social 2017-12-03
2017-12-03 UTC
rowan joined the channel
# 
xmpp-social [Takyoji] Would there ever, ever be any logical reason for anything to be addressed to the "following" (not 'followers') collection? Is there any sort of filtering or specific decision making on what destinations an actor is able to send to?
# xmpp-social [Takyoji] Also, as for JSON-LD, should cases of "embedding" be considered? E.g., if an Actor object was embedded as one of the destinations, rather than just the IRI of the Actor
xmpp-social and KjetilK joined the channel
# saranix takyoji: 'filtering'/security is up to the implementor. I can't think of a logical reason to address the following class where the person would allow it, but that doesn't mean your implementation can't do it that way or that there is no use...
# saranix takyoji: you can 'embed' objects, but when receiving them, most implementations (rightfully) will not trust embeds and will re-fetch anyway. LD-signatures can only solve some of these cases, most often it's better not to embed
timbl, JanKusanagi and puck1pedia joined the channel