#social 2019-04-05
2019-04-05 UTC
vitalyster and xmpp-social joined the channel
# 
Chocobozzz fr33domlover: yep you're right, i'll fix that
# Chocobozzz do we use as:commentsEnabled?
# dansup Chocobozzz: I'd say its fine
# cjslep[m] What vocabulary is "as" aliased to?
# dansup ActivityStreams
# cjslep[m] You need to pick an RDF definition or define your own in an extension
# dansup which is what sc is
# cjslep[m] ActivityStreams doesnt have a "commentsEnabled" property though
# dansup so, its not like any sensible implementation adheres to json-ld lol
# cjslep[m] Don't pollute a spec you don't own... Either define your own (ex: Litepub) or reuse existing (ex: schema.org)
# dansup lol
# cjslep[m] I mean... Go-fed v1 has a tool that code generates expecting a well defined JSON-LD vocabulary ecosystem
# dansup the spec is just a recommendation, in the real world it only matters what the implementations do
# cjslep[m] For all kaniini's railing against JSON-LD processing at runtime, he set up Litepub and Litepub properties to still be well defined as such
# dansup and how many users does Go-fed have? Or implementations even?
# cjslep[m] I mean yes we can have the idealism vs realism debate. But I don't want to rehash it
# dansup exactly, its about user experience first. If you put tech first you will fail
# cjslep[m] Write.as, WriteFreely, a contractor for the German Health Ministry is looking at using the code generation tool specifically, my blog
# cjslep[m] I am just politely asking to define the new property with a few hours extra effort, so that it is properly book-kept in @context without being silently grafted onto ActivityStreams
# dansup "looking", I appreciate your enthusiasm but maybe its misplaced
# Chocobozzz I proposed activity stream to stay in the same spirit than https://www.w3.org/wiki/Activity_Streams_extensions
# dansup Pixelfed is the fastest growing AP project besides mastodon and peertube. I know what I'm doing
# dansup a library is cool and all if someone uses it but the kudos belongs to WriteFreely
# cjslep[m] I'm not questioning you, and I'm sorry if it came across that way
# dansup cjslep[m]: ok, please consider that I run a production AP project and all though I respect your project I don't agree with what you are saying.
# cjslep[m] dansup I hope you and Matt reach the top of the world. I also hope one day you reflect on this conversation
cjslep[m] left the channel
# dansup lol
# dansup I apologize for what I said to cjslep, that was childish
dansup and timbl joined the channel; dansup left the channel
# fr33domlover I agree with cjslep. Pick an existing property or a new custom unique URI. It's safer for the future, for compatibility, for interoperability of independent pieces of software
timbl, cjslep[m], timbl_, naturzukunft, up201705417 and tenma joined the channel