wagle, [kevinmarks], [eddie], tantek, [cleverdevil], drkokandy and [pfefferle] joined the channel
#[pfefferle]I implemented delete Webmentions in the latest version in master, perhaps some of you will be able to test a bit... [dshanske] already discovered it 😉
[kevinmarks], [miklb], tantek, [cleverdevil] and [pfefferle] joined the channel
#[pfefferle]GWG Ah, now I understand! You talked about the hook you implemented in the Webmention plugin... I misread that and thought you implemented the functionality in a custom using the hook 😊
#GWGpfefferle, I tried to think ahead. I just never built it. You did. Kudos.
chrisaldrich, [tantek], tantek and [kevinmarks] joined the channel
#chrisaldrichIs there a pathway for sites that want to keep webmentions (and not delete them) for archival purposes? I'd hate for someone to have control over deleting content on my own site.
#chrisaldrichI'm game for people sending edit wms to change/fix typos, but there should be a mechanism for approving/denying these right?
#chrisaldrichmoving it to private could be a worthwhile replacement, yet.
#chrisaldrichI'd be more worried about having a copy of an interesting conversation and then half of it disappearing at some point.
#tantekit's up to the independent site owner what to do when they receive a delete webmention. yes, deleting the response is the preferred thing to do, but there are other alternatives for things like comments (e.g. keep but show strikethrough, or keep private)
#tantekbut for reactions like likes, reposts etc. what's the point of keeping them? might as well just delete them. especially something like a like, if it was an accidental like, no need to keep it when you get the delete for it