scor, spinnerin, shaners, tantek, tantek_, erinjo, eschnou, jedahan, andreypopp, friedcell, adactio, mxuribe and barnabywalters joined the channel
#Loqibarnabywalters: erinjo left you a message on 2/26 at 1:47pm: In general for interactions that are fairly small and limited to just one or a few steps it's best to keep people on the original page if it's likely they'll still want to see that page. You'll see it in other bookmark, favorite, login, zoom, etc type actions. In a scenario where someone was reading an article, and wanted to email it to a friend, if that action could be accomplished through an overlay, drop down,
zztr, dpk, jedahan, erinjo, tantek, eschnou and friedcell joined the channel
#barnabywalters!tell tommorris any chance of parenthesising/similar your POSSE tweet permalinks? It can be tricky to tell whether or not there’s any more content when they’re bare :)
#tommorrisbarnabywalters: sure. I'll fix that soon
#Loqitommorris: barnabywalters left you a message 15 minutes ago: any chance of parenthesising/similar your POSSE tweet permalinks? It can be tricky to tell whether or not there’s any more content when they’re bare :)
#barnabywaltersquick web actions poll: would you want to be able to attach more than one potential endpoint (delegate/service) to an action, having one as a default and the others available via a dropdown?
#tommorriswe talk about having one url tied to one person, but it's really one url tied to one identity. people can have multiple identities/personas and thus URLs
#barnabywaltersokay, so you’d create two service => url pairs with different names, and they’d be offered in the list
#tommorrisa human use case for this: I've got a genderqueer friend who has an androgynous identity which they consider their true self, and their 'RL' identity for school/work/RL friends.
#tommorriswe shouldn't build tools that prevent them from posting to the most appropriate site for the content and identity in question
#tantektommorris - I'd argue that having an active link when all you provide is the *exact* same content is bad UX for your friends that follow you on Twitter.
#tantekthere's an unspoken convention on Twitter that a link in a Tweet should provide more information
#aaronpkI tried separating my links with a space, but I got several confused replies saying "you forgot a /"
#tantekaaronpk - I've gotten a couple of those as well. I think I need to write an FAQ.
#aaronpkI haven't heard any complaints about my links wrapped in parens
#tantek.comedited /Twitter (+1036) "/* POSSE Notes to Twitter */ POSSE entire note to twitter vs. POSSE abbr note to twitter with links to complaints/questions" (view diff)
#tantekneeds to cleanup his Falcon code that does the whole "how this note appear on Twitter" string logic and add it to CASSIS.js
#tommorristantek: see, I think about it like this. if someone complains on Twitter, I'll explain to them why I'm doing it. it's like occasionally, I'll wear funny shoes because I think they look neat. there's two options when people say they look strange, either I tell them I like them that way and I think they look neat, or I give into social convention.
#tantekI think it's a reasonable social convention that investing your time clicking on a link and loading another page will result in being given more information.
#tantekI too fought it for a while, but when *every single UI/UX person* I talked to had the exact same response, I was like, ok, this is a well established convention.
#tantekin addition, they were almost all *upset* about it!
#tantekfor some reason, clicking a link and not seeing any new information was/is viscerally upsetting to UI/UX people. so avoiding that is just good emotional design IMHO.
#aaronpkoh, what exactly is "the sound of the kitten being strangled by the URL"?