#sandeepshettygithub.com/sandeepshetty There was an error verifying this provider. Confirm you have a rel="me" link on this site pointing to your website.
#aaronpk!tell sandeepshetty for some reason it's not following your sandeep.io -> www.sandeep.io redirect anymore. looks like it will work with www.sandeep.io now. also I fixed twitter logins. I'll see if I can fix this tonight
#tantek.comedited /PESOS (+394) "/* Disadvantages */ Twitter TOS disallows "Exporting Twitter Content to a datastore as a service or other cloud based service" (!!)" (view diff)
#@favouriteblogsLinkwertig: Neuland, IndieWeb, so.cl, Sammeln: Das Notizblog über den Aufstieg des IndieWebs und mehr.Mehr zum ThemaLinkwertig: Telek...
#@danilop1968Linkwertig: Neuland, IndieWeb, so.cl, Sammeln: Das Notizblog über den Aufstieg des IndieWebs und mehr. http://adf.ly/QoGGt
cweiske, tantek, jfranusic, friedcell, morrocco_mole, poppy, seyz and pfefferle joined the channel
#pfefferlehow do you folks validate webmentions exactly? do you accept them only when there is a class="u-in-reply-to" or do you regexp the content if there is the target url mentioned?
#pfefferleand i have to use live debugging via email, because wordpress doesn't send ping backs on a local system
#cweiskepfefferle, I'd dig into wordpress then and find where it disables it
#cweiskebtw, I used the wrong CLI arguments for my own pingback server yesterday and it went amok, sending out pingbacks from my dev system to the world, too :)
#erikmaartenpfefferle: I was just thinking about that question too -- until now, my "validation" has only been looking for an address corresponding to some permalink on my side, but working on it ...
#erikmaartenI will try to use the in-reply-to, though that depends on everybody else actually using that format in posts. Well, I assume that's the standard.
#pfefferlei ran into a problem with the validating yesterday and thought it was a wrong implementation, but the post wasn't marked up like i expected it to be...
#acegiakI'll need to make a child theme to get the icons for my blogroll to be smaller and I had a neat thing on my old theme where when I rebloged a post it would downsize the images until the post was clicked on
#acegiakpfefferle: does it do in-reply-to in the h-entry?
#pfefferlemichielbdejong: you have to install some plugins
#michielbdejongwe might consider offering indieweb-enabled wordpress hosting if such a product would make sense. so just wordpress with the right plugins activated
#michielbdejongwe're setting up a non-profit hosting provider
#pfefferleacegiak: you can add it by hand ;) i am thinking about some custom-tags like the youtube/Oembed stuff
#pfefferlemichielbdejong: oh, nice! but there is still some work to do! I think I get a simple webmention plugin to work until weekend
#acegiakpfefferle: yeah I might do, for my purposes I can store it in metadata but the question is would it be easier for other people to utilise if it's actually just the first link in the post?
#michielbdejongif you read that thread, you see "Barnaby" post something, and then you see "Laurent" reply to "waterpigs", which you then have to translate in your head
#michielbdejongnot sure if that was what you were talking about with the @-mentions :)
#barnabywaltersmy bad for sticking with the stupid domain name I thought was a good idea when I was 12 ;)
#acegiakmichielbdejong: The problem is if you're replying to something and your link text is the title of the article they posted?
#michielbdejongbarnabywalters: no, the same thing happens with everybody else's domain names :)
#michielbdejongthe equivalent of how twitter does it would be to display "Full Name @domain.com", with @domain.com in grey in each post, then when you later on in the thread see @domain.com being mentioned, it's not such a surprise as if the thread post heads only had "Full Name" as their author indicator
#michielbdejongand the same could work out for @domain.com/article mentions then
#acegiakoh, so the link has to start with the @ and not be followed by whitespace?
#tommorrisso, http://fullcontact.com - a paid for Google Social Graph API type service that follows rel=me and other similar links to work out all your social web profiles
#pfefferleacegiak: not the link, the value <a>@something</a>
#tommorrisI just popped my email address in and it has told me my age, name, location and the URLs for my accounts on Flickr, last.fm, Digg, delicious, twitter, google, yahoo, facebook, github, quora, foursquare, vimeo, myspace, lanyrd and youtube
#acegiakbut we want to require the value to START with the @ ?
#pfefferlereplaced by <a class="u-in-reply-to" rel="in-reply-to">@something</a>
#acegiakyou can use the regex in the plugin too if you want to only send mentions based on that syntax though
friedcell joined the channel
#acegiakthat filter will come in handy for trying to build an h-entry plugin
#cweiskeacegiak, you can't parse microformats with xpath, much less with regex
#pfefferlecweiske: it's only for adding some semantics to a link
#barnabywalterscweiske: can’t parse mf with xpath? I must be doing something wrong with php-mf2 then ;)
#acegiakcweiske: I'm not trying to parse, I'm trying to inject
#cweiskebarnabywalters, how do you separate h-entry>p-name from h-entry>p-author>h-card>p-name?
#barnabywalterscweiske: depth-first searching. I loop through all nested h-* elements, depth first, then parse the properties working my way back up the chain
#tommorrisproblem with a London get-together is it'd start at 5pm BST. ;)
sandeepshetty joined the channel
#Loqisandeepshetty: aaronpk left you a message 12 hours, 36 minutes ago: for some reason it's not following your sandeep.io -> www.sandeep.io redirect anymore. looks like it will work with www.sandeep.io now. also I fixed twitter logins. I'll see if I can fix this tonight
#sandeepshettyaaronpk: I added the www to my github profile but it still doesn't work <a href="http://www.sandeep.io" class="url" rel="nofollow me">http://www.sandeep.io</a>
#aaronpkthe answer is yes it's broken now, it should be accepting sandeep.io, but the workaround is to enter www.sandeep.io in the login form and it should accept it
#barnabywaltersso over the weekend I’ll be working on improving php-mf2 and mf-cleaner so it’s easier for others to do the same, and on note page+note list styling
#aaronpkbarnabywalters: I think I actually sent you a pingback though
#aaronpkmy code checks first for pingback support and uses that if it's there
#barnabywaltersah, right — yep, I looked in the logs and it was a pingback
#aaronpksame thing on your side tho basically, yea?
#barnabywalterspretty much, yep — I have a route each for pingback and webmention, both of which just pass off the to and from URIs into a generic registerMention method
#aaronpk!tell tantek I parsed out the h-cards from the guest list page to automatically count the people. Is there a way to indicate remote participants separate from the main attendees? http://indiewebcamp.com/scratch/guest-list.php
#Loqitantek: aaronpk left you a message 1 hour, 41 minutes ago: I parsed out the h-cards from the guest list page to automatically count the people. Is there a way to indicate remote participants separate from the main attendees? http://indiewebcamp.com/scratch/guest-list.php
#sandeepshetty_benwerd: I already have a #private tag that keeps posts containing it to myself and I've been thinking about implementing moderated subscription to tags
#benwerdYeah, I've seen that, and was thinking about using that for the time being too - every object in my db does have an access permission, but the interfaces are all hardcoded to public right now
#sandeepshetty_I like how pinboard.in has this convention of .tagname for private tags... haven't been able to come up with a similar convention for #hastags to avoid any admin overhead (marking a tag as private)
#sandeepshetty_#. (e.g., #.research-for-secret project ) doesn't feel right.... anyone here want to take a stab at a convention for private #hashtags?
#barnabywalterssandeepshetty_: what do you mean by private? so only you can view the tag? or content tagged with that tag?
#barnabywaltersI can’t really understand the reason for private tags on public content — what do people typically use them for?
#sandeepshetty_I use if for secret reasearch projects (for my business) but I can also imaging using something like this: #.good-programmer-but-not-a-nice-person
#Loqisandeepshetty_ meant to say: I use if for secret reasearch projects (for my business) but I can also imagine using something like this: #.good-programmer-but-not-a-nice-person
#barnabywalterssandeepshetty_: so you do secret research in public, but tagged secretly?! second use case makes a lot of sense
#sandeepshetty_in the stream of stuff I do you won't that it's for a specific business (unless you see the #business-name tag)
#sandeepshetty_barnabywalters: the #private-domainname stuff you mentioned earlier is interesting when combined with webmention... especially if there was a way to do a private webmention (maybe send a secret key along in the webmention that the receiver needs to use, in a header maybe, while retrieving the content from sender)
#Loqisandeepshetty_ meant to say: It's just that there's no push stuff that does it
tantek joined the channel
#benwerdRight. So I'm not convinced that webmention *isn't* a good starting place here - yes, there's a dialback, but it's a signed notification that something's been posted, and then a signed check to verify the content. Assuming keys were swapped before then, when a social connection was made, that doesn't strike me as too big a deal.
#sandeepshetty_benwerd: BTW, you don't the signed notification with webmention because the receiver has to fetch content from source which can be proof of origin if it's done over https
#Loqisandeepshetty_ meant to say: benwerd: BTW, you don't need the signed notification with webmention because the receiver has to fetch content from source which can be proof of origin if it's done over https
#aaronpksay I send 1000 different servers a message saying that sandeep.io sent them a message, then they would all immediately go fetch the URL at sandeep.io to verify
#aaronpkso if the initial request was signed, you could verify the signature without making an http request
#sandeepshetty_though a ddos is more about making someone do more than you can.. if your sending 1000 webmentions you might as well have sent 1000 requests to sandeep.io
#aaronpkI could send your server 1000 notifications saying that 1000 different servers sent you a message, and then you'd have to go make http requests to verify them all
#sandeepshetty_so the other direction scenario can only be prevented with keys swaped before hand. If it uses salmon style dailback for verifying keys then it has the same problem
#aaronpkyea i thought you were talking about swapping keys before-hand