#acegiaktumblr allows a person to reblog an article by another person and add additional comment, both the original content and the comment are displayed as a post on the reblogger's page
#tantek!tell barnabywalters - what do you think of adding an "id" param to the php-mf2 parser which would only parse the DOM node with that "id"?
#acegiaktantek: at the moment it's a glorified rss reader, that allows "reblogging" but the idea is to recreate something like a facebook wall or a tumblr dash
#sandeepshetty_I can still like but I was seeing if I could drop it and see what happens... The new site design had made me focus more on simplicity...
#tantekyou made more progress in IndieWeb "Like" presentation / interaction / fallback than all other efforts combined that I know of in the past 2 years
#sandeepshetty_Do you have examples of stuff you want to dislike?
#acegiakthe wikipedia page for westborough baptist church
#acegiakon my blog I currently "like" things by posting them as link posts in the "like" category
#acegiakbut I don't see why there's a big difference between "I like this post about cooking" and "this restraurant was only slightly above average, 3.5/5 stars"
#acegiakthe problem with my approach though is that when it is presented as a boolean, ie "like" or "thumbs up" is that equal to 1 on the scale or like... 0.6?
#sandeepshetty_When you rate something you send a different message than when you like
#acegiakdo you? isn't a like just a really simple rating?
#sandeepshetty_IMO, like sends a different social signal... it's either an emotional response by the liker or a way for the liker to show support / encourage the poster whose post is being liked
#sandeepshetty_at least that's how it works on silos... there one other aspect of using it as a way to bookmark something
#sandeepshetty_but I think primarily its the former (emotional response and showing support to original poster)
#acegiakit is my domain, but there are multiple blogs on there
#sandeepshetty_there was some discussion about using path based urls but I think the general consensus is that the real world use cases don't justify it...
#acegiakmost of them are different group blogs, but the idea is that once I get it working nicely then friends/family can use it to then have their own personal pages on there
#acegiakso for instance my wife could have machinespirit.net/blackwool and not have to do any setup
#acegiakI could rearrange the url structure thoguh
#acegiakmy plan is to have openldap underneath managing accounts for email, xmpp, and wordpress based social networking
#acegiakthe reason for choosing wordpress was so that if my friends wanted to then set up their own server and join in it would be easy
#acegiakcause all the other ostatus implementations (Which is what I was looking at when I set up) were hideous for non-technical people to set up
#acegiakI'm not sure what the term for something like machinespirit.net is though. Federated mini-silo?
#sandeepshetty_Your use case is similar to what most federated social networks have where someone hosts your presence for you. I guess the question is about ownership... do the other users really own the /path based url... you (or any provider) could choose to just take it away based on your own TOS
#acegiaksandeepshetty_: I agree with you ethically
#acegiakpragmatically, my wife doesn't want to have to set up her own system unless it's super easy
#acegiakespecially if it then has to be on a separate machine/virtual machine
#sandeepshetty_I guess (bsaed on past discussions I've seen here) indieweb mandates "federated" setups give out subdomains but I'm not really sure how that's any better in this case
#sandeepshetty_and given that even TLDs have different TOS, I'm not sure how even a domain is actually better.
#acegiakI agree that the user should own their data, I just want to make that as easy as possible for the non-technical user
#acegiakI'm wondering about figuring out a set up for the raspberry pi so that then people can just plug that machine into their network and host from home
#acegiakbut then you need to workk out dynamic dns and things like that
#acegiakthe response from my family and friends seemed to be "I trust you, as a person, can you just set it up for me?" hence the mini-silo
#tantek!tell sandeepshetty per even the definitions you looked up, share (self) does not make sense, not to mention the differences in emotional context between, self, send to a small few, and publish publicly.
#tantekacegiak - right - we've discussed that in the past and haven't come to any positive conclusion regarding subdirectories - since theyr'e not really "owning your own domain"
melvster, friedcell and barnabywalters joined the channel
#Loqibarnabywalters: tantek left you a message 9 hours, 17 minutes ago: - what do you think of adding an "id" param to the php-mf2 parser which would only parse the DOM node with that "id"?
#barnabywalters!tell tantek RE php-mf2 id param — good plan, either that or give it a DOMNode as context and parse everything under that only. Will raise as issue.
#tommorrisworking out the current ID context of embedded data (microformats and RDFa) is painful. the RDFa spec is complicated because of that kind of context stuff
#barnabywalterspfefferle: hey, if it makes adding microformats *even easier* than it already is, it can’t be a bad thing :)
#pfefferleyes, but i can't access all values through the actions and filters :(
#tommorrisbecause @id is overloaded to mean both fragment identifier and to mean "blob of page I want to style". it's invisible metadata
#@gavinwyeJust got @bywordapp set up to publish direct to Wordpress now all my notes can actually live somewhere #indieweb
#tommorrisand the semantic folks use @id one way, and then web designers come in and start slathering the page with more @id's for styling and crazy shit happens
#barnabywalterstommorris: no more so than @class, surely? not sure I understand the problem properly
#pfefferlebarnabywalters: can you send me just another webmention/pingback? i think everything should be work fine now...
#barnabywaltersha ha yes :) RE not linked: probably because the parser isn’t picking up a u-url and I’m not using the source webmention URI there for some reason
#Loqisandeepshetty: tantek left you a message 5 hours, 45 minutes ago: per even the definitions you looked up, share (self) does not make sense, not to mention the differences in emotional context between, self, send to a small few, and publish publicly.
erikmaarten joined the channel
#sandeepshettyis feeling under the weather... hoping it doesn't stop him from remotely attending #indiewebcamp
#sandeepshettyI've created a new branch for webmention 0.2. Here is a quick summary of changes: http://www.sandeep.io/71 Looking for feedback from implementors. Points 3, 4 and 5 there are the main changes.
#sandeepshettyoh and also the note about updating existing webmentions
#pfefferlesandeepshetty: I like that you removed the "html or json" error response types
#sandeepshettyyeah as was notes on the wiki, it will normally be seen by a human for debugging.. I split errors into 400 and 500 so that you can retry reqeusts that you got 500 error for
#Loqisandeepshetty meant to say: yeah as was noted on the wiki, it will normally be seen by a human for debugging.. I split errors into 400 and 500 so that you can retry reqeusts that you got 500 error for
#sandeepshettyalso the note about updating webmentions is imp so that we can have the ability to update comments on remote site and unlike stuff we might have liked before
#pfefferleoh man… that means a lot more work to do ;)
#sandeepshettyyeah.. if we want it to be as useful as centralized commenting and likes :)
#pfefferleno seriously, it is very useful to do it like that! I am changing and extending my blogposts a lot!
#sandeepshettyyeah I had a case where I changed a comment after sending the webmention and one where I changed a like to a comment later :D
#erikmaartensandeepshetty: Does the updating of comments really need to be part of the specification? Perhaps some would rather not update comments after they are made?
#cweiskewebmention should not say anything about what happens afterwards
#pfefferlesandeepshetty: have you fully implemented web mentions in coverspace?
#sandeepshettyPingback disallowed resending the same ping (with a special error code for it)...
#sandeepshettyI still accept them just that I might not be publishing likes.. I'm leaning towards commenting on a post rather than just liking it
erikmaarten and bnvk joined the channel
#pfefferlethats true but sometimes you want to share a link and want to say that you like the idea!?!
#sandeepshettypfefferle: with simple mentions I meant just saying next to the post that this linked was mentioned in all these places (along with author photo, dt-published, etc.)
#sandeepshettylike and share have subtle differences.. but I think I prefer sending simpler signals now :)
#pfefferleacegiak had a nice idea to convert wordings like @http://.… to <a href="" class="u-in-reply-to"> or <3 http://... to <a href="" class="u-like">
#sandeepshettyI"m really glad there is so much wordpress action happening with this indieweb stuff.. it makes it accessible to lot of non-tech creators.
#sandeepshettybbiab (working on implementing showing comments)
#Loqitantek: barnabywalters left you a message 5 hours, 4 minutes ago: RE php-mf2 id param — good plan, either that or give it a DOMNode as context and parse everything under that only. Will raise as issue.
#acegiaksandeep, i only know of myself machinespirit.net/acegiak using it personally and wordpress.org only gives me download numbers not continuing usage
#sandeepshettyNot sure if it should go under a plugins section under Wordpress or a separate project? There's also the /wordpress page where indieweb pluging could be added... suggestions?
#pfefferlea plugin section would nice. so others can set up their indieweb server with wordpress and a bunch of plugins
#sandeepshettypfefferle: Re "sometimes you want to share a link and want to say that you like the idea" isn't sharing itself saying that you like the idea? Why would you share if you don't like it? and how is sharing+like different from sharing plus adding a comment?
#sandeepshettypfefferle: trying to figure out how you think/feel about these things...
#pfefferlei won't say so… sometimes you share a link because you want to mention a bad example
#sandeepshettylike using fav for bookmarking is just a workaround on twitter?
#barnabywalterscan I do the equivalent of a facebook “like” on twitter? is there a way of sending the same message? and vice versa, for all silos+verbs
#sandeepshettypfefferle: what would you do with that post? share and !like or just share or something else?
#sandeepshettybarnabywalters: I think the twitter fav is very similar to the facebook like, both are meant to be primarily signals to the orignal poster (and not to your audience)
#barnabywalterssandeepshetty: twitter fav !== fb like. Likes influence future advertising, future content, might show up on friends’ streams. favs are not broadcast, might influence ads but don’t influence future content
#melvsterwait a share is not a like, a like is a +1
#barnabywaltersstill, the two are used in extremely different ways purely due to UI and UX differences
#barnabywalterse.g. twitter almost guarantees your posts showing up in order, so you can retweet a bunch of tweets then reply to/comment on them all publicly in one go
#barnabywalterssome will see them in order, others will see random disconnected posts
#sandeepshettybut since comments are nested does it matter?
#barnabywalterssay you retweeted some stuff you strongly disagree with, to then comment on. Wouldn’t happen on FB due to danger of people not seeing comments
#sandeepshettyIt's also interesting that along that dimension (who it's directed towards) almost all of them are consistent - fb has share and like, twitter has retweet and fav and tumblr has reblog and like
#sandeepshettybut when you add other dimensions it becomes very inconsistent
#barnabywaltersanyone know when twitter introduced fav, and whether or not it was based on paving a cowpath as retweet was?
#barnabywaltersthe examples where the community created the syntax interest me the most
#barnabywaltersthing I like about twitter it that it’s unambiguous, which gives people much more freedom to experiment
#barnabywaltersunlike facebook. no idea what tumblr is like as I’ve never used it
#sandeepshettybarnabywalters: you mean ambiguous? being unambiguous makes it more rigid and less flexible?
#barnabywaltersno, with twitter you know that anything you post/retweet will turn up in your follower’s stream in order. also you know favs are not broadcast. facebook guarantees neither
#sandeepshettyah.. favs are actually just published to another stream right on twitter? it's the same with tumblr.
#sandeepshettyso they do broadcast but to a minor stream that your followers have to explicitly check
#sandeepshettyhadn't thought of the time-based-ordering difference between fb and twitter till now.
#barnabywaltersbased on my first experiences last year, updated after tending to remote participation at IWCUK
#sandeepshettyyep I've seen it.. I remeber seeing etherpads at some other event that tantek went to.. was it fedsocweb... I think etherpad is a good way to record a session
#barnabywaltersetherpad is great, especially if we use wiki syntax and then dump it on the wiki for later
#barnabywaltersyeah, which might not be such a bad connotation
bnvk_ joined the channel
#www.sandeep.iocreated /microsyntax (+373) "Created page with "{{stub}} A place to brainstorm indieweb microsyntax especially for plaintext [[notes]] * <nowiki>@http://example.com => <a href="http://example.com" class="in-reply-to"></nowik..."" (view diff)
#waterpigs.co.ukedited /microsyntax (+246) "/* Brainstorming */ -1 for @mentions of post URLs (and can we please all sign our discussion contributions?)" (view diff)