acegiaktumblr allows a person to reblog an article by another person and add additional comment, both the original content and the comment are displayed as a post on the reblogger's page
acegiaktantek: at the moment it's a glorified rss reader, that allows "reblogging" but the idea is to recreate something like a facebook wall or a tumblr dash
tantekyou made more progress in IndieWeb "Like" presentation / interaction / fallback than all other efforts combined that I know of in the past 2 years
acegiakbut I don't see why there's a big difference between "I like this post about cooking" and "this restraurant was only slightly above average, 3.5/5 stars"
acegiakthe problem with my approach though is that when it is presented as a boolean, ie "like" or "thumbs up" is that equal to 1 on the scale or like... 0.6?
sandeepshetty_IMO, like sends a different social signal... it's either an emotional response by the liker or a way for the liker to show support / encourage the poster whose post is being liked
sandeepshetty_there was some discussion about using path based urls but I think the general consensus is that the real world use cases don't justify it...
acegiakmost of them are different group blogs, but the idea is that once I get it working nicely then friends/family can use it to then have their own personal pages on there
sandeepshetty_Your use case is similar to what most federated social networks have where someone hosts your presence for you. I guess the question is about ownership... do the other users really own the /path based url... you (or any provider) could choose to just take it away based on your own TOS
sandeepshetty_I guess (bsaed on past discussions I've seen here) indieweb mandates "federated" setups give out subdomains but I'm not really sure how that's any better in this case
acegiakI'm wondering about figuring out a set up for the raspberry pi so that then people can just plug that machine into their network and host from home
tantek!tell sandeepshetty per even the definitions you looked up, share (self) does not make sense, not to mention the differences in emotional context between, self, send to a small few, and publish publicly.
tantekacegiak - right - we've discussed that in the past and haven't come to any positive conclusion regarding subdirectories - since theyr'e not really "owning your own domain"
Loqibarnabywalters: tantek left you a message 9 hours, 17 minutes ago: - what do you think of adding an "id" param to the php-mf2 parser which would only parse the DOM node with that "id"?
barnabywalters!tell tantek RE php-mf2 id param — good plan, either that or give it a DOMNode as context and parse everything under that only. Will raise as issue.
tommorrisworking out the current ID context of embedded data (microformats and RDFa) is painful. the RDFa spec is complicated because of that kind of context stuff
tommorrisand the semantic folks use @id one way, and then web designers come in and start slathering the page with more @id's for styling and crazy shit happens
barnabywaltersha ha yes :) RE not linked: probably because the parser isn’t picking up a u-url and I’m not using the source webmention URI there for some reason
Loqisandeepshetty: tantek left you a message 5 hours, 45 minutes ago: per even the definitions you looked up, share (self) does not make sense, not to mention the differences in emotional context between, self, send to a small few, and publish publicly.
sandeepshettyI've created a new branch for webmention 0.2. Here is a quick summary of changes: http://www.sandeep.io/71 Looking for feedback from implementors. Points 3, 4 and 5 there are the main changes.
sandeepshettyyeah as was notes on the wiki, it will normally be seen by a human for debugging.. I split errors into 400 and 500 so that you can retry reqeusts that you got 500 error for
Loqisandeepshetty meant to say: yeah as was noted on the wiki, it will normally be seen by a human for debugging.. I split errors into 400 and 500 so that you can retry reqeusts that you got 500 error for
sandeepshettyalso the note about updating webmentions is imp so that we can have the ability to update comments on remote site and unlike stuff we might have liked before
erikmaartensandeepshetty: Does the updating of comments really need to be part of the specification? Perhaps some would rather not update comments after they are made?
sandeepshettypfefferle: with simple mentions I meant just saying next to the post that this linked was mentioned in all these places (along with author photo, dt-published, etc.)
pfefferleacegiak had a nice idea to convert wordings like @http://.… to <a href="" class="u-in-reply-to"> or <3 http://... to <a href="" class="u-like">
sandeepshettyI"m really glad there is so much wordpress action happening with this indieweb stuff.. it makes it accessible to lot of non-tech creators.
Loqitantek: barnabywalters left you a message 5 hours, 4 minutes ago: RE php-mf2 id param — good plan, either that or give it a DOMNode as context and parse everything under that only. Will raise as issue.
acegiaksandeep, i only know of myself machinespirit.net/acegiak using it personally and wordpress.org only gives me download numbers not continuing usage
sandeepshettyNot sure if it should go under a plugins section under Wordpress or a separate project? There's also the /wordpress page where indieweb pluging could be added... suggestions?
sandeepshettypfefferle: Re "sometimes you want to share a link and want to say that you like the idea" isn't sharing itself saying that you like the idea? Why would you share if you don't like it? and how is sharing+like different from sharing plus adding a comment?
barnabywalterscan I do the equivalent of a facebook “like” on twitter? is there a way of sending the same message? and vice versa, for all silos+verbs
sandeepshettybarnabywalters: I think the twitter fav is very similar to the facebook like, both are meant to be primarily signals to the orignal poster (and not to your audience)
barnabywalterssandeepshetty: twitter fav !== fb like. Likes influence future advertising, future content, might show up on friends’ streams. favs are not broadcast, might influence ads but don’t influence future content
barnabywalterse.g. twitter almost guarantees your posts showing up in order, so you can retweet a bunch of tweets then reply to/comment on them all publicly in one go
barnabywalterssay you retweeted some stuff you strongly disagree with, to then comment on. Wouldn’t happen on FB due to danger of people not seeing comments
sandeepshettyIt's also interesting that along that dimension (who it's directed towards) almost all of them are consistent - fb has share and like, twitter has retweet and fav and tumblr has reblog and like
barnabywaltersno, with twitter you know that anything you post/retweet will turn up in your follower’s stream in order. also you know favs are not broadcast. facebook guarantees neither
sandeepshettyyep I've seen it.. I remeber seeing etherpads at some other event that tantek went to.. was it fedsocweb... I think etherpad is a good way to record a session
www.sandeep.iocreated /microsyntax (+373) "Created page with "{{stub}} A place to brainstorm indieweb microsyntax especially for plaintext [[notes]] * <nowiki>@http://example.com => <a href="http://example.com" class="in-reply-to"></nowik..."" (view diff)
waterpigs.co.ukedited /microsyntax (+246) "/* Brainstorming */ -1 for @mentions of post URLs (and can we please all sign our discussion contributions?)" (view diff)