2013-12-14 UTC
fritzy, andreypopp, smus, tpinto_, paulcp, adactio and julian` joined the channel
# 01:49 julian` is it a good idea to have a separate version of a site for mobile devices etc with media queries
fritzy, dentonjacobs, julian`, snarfed, amblin_, tommorris, marjolein, bnvk, Acidnerd, skinny and caseorganic joined the channel
# 06:17 _doge cryptocoins are awesome, they get people running non-app-store software on their own computer :)
andreypopp, LauraJ, julian`, tpinto_, skinny, eschnou, smus, poppy, skinny_, bnvk, bnvk_, dentonjacobs, jschweinsberg, melvster, CheckDavid and pfenwick joined the channel
andreypopp, friedcell, eschnou, LauraJ, bnvk and dentonjacobs joined the channel
dentonjacobs joined the channel
LauraJ joined the channel
# 15:48 Loqi [@nchenga] “@benwerd: "The decentralized web"
bnvk and tpinto_ joined the channel
andreypopp, friedcell, friedcell1, dentonjacobs, snarfed and jschweinsberg joined the channel
# 17:21 aaronpk snarfed: ok I just fixed accepting webmentions to my short URLs, so I think I can try bridgy again!
# 17:21 aaronpk i'm a little scared to turn it on since I still have a few other glitches I need to handle with webmention processing
# 17:22 aaronpk like I'm pretty sure i'm gonna get double comments from people like barnaby and benwerd, both their own comment and the twitter posse version
# 17:22 snarfed the agony and ecstasy of launching something that already has lots of prod traffic
# 17:23 snarfed you'll be happy to know i'm working on likes/favorites right now
# 17:23 snarfed yeah there's not enough prior art for those, so i'll be glad to see more
friedcell joined the channel
# 17:26 snarfed the twitter reply chain is a conversation about the original tweet just like the list of comment on another site
# 17:27 aaronpk I was going with the assumption that my rendering of a conversation is not good enough yet
# 17:27 aaronpk so I only show direct replies to posts in the section below my posts
# 17:27 snarfed you could technically do it by having webmentions fan out
# 17:28 snarfed ie if you get a wm for a reply of your own, you send a matching one to the post you replied to
# 17:29 aaronpk but don't think of a webmention as a special kind of message
# 17:29 snarfed it is interesting to think about the two models. reply to replies vs all reply to the post. this works for now though
# 17:30 aaronpk notice you didn't need to tell me to change my webmention processing for my own reply to show up
# 17:30 snarfed on an unrelated note, this also shows that i should replace t.co links with the actual urls, since twitter provides them
# 17:31 aaronpk couldn't hurt to at least find what the t.co version links to, hard-coded for twitter
# 17:32 aaronpk hm so now my timestamp is linking to the brid.gy URL, rather than the URL brid.gy says is canonical
# 17:33 aaronpk I remember implementing that and wondering whcih URL I should link to
# 17:33 snarfed since in almost all of our own cases, the fetched url is the same as the internal u-url
# 17:33 aaronpk a) the actual source URL from the webmention request, or b) the URL that the parsed h-entry refers to
# 17:33 snarfed yup, proxies like this are one argument for using the actual data rather than the metadata source url
# 17:33 aaronpk I think I actually started by using the URL from the h-entry, but that was causing problems when it couldn't find peopels' URLs or something
# 17:34 aaronpk I should proabbly switch back to that and fix up error handling
# 17:37 aaronpk wow it's so crazy to see twitter replies on my site
# 17:38 aaronpk hah there is a whole code block commented out for this
# 17:50 snarfed yeah, it's an interesting feeling. we've had such a small, curated community, everything has been so pristine and controlled
# 17:50 aaronpk I think it's already prompted people to go improve handling of things, given that most people disabled bridgy immediately after receiving a few mentions
icco joined the channel
# 17:52 aaronpk i'm sure they will! this is a good impetus to improve things!
smus, heathjs, realz, amblin, a__, friedcell and natwelch joined the channel
# 18:18 aaronpk *whew* managed to finally find one of sandeep's "like" posts of an article of mine
smus and icco joined the channel
# 18:22 snarfed i've been collecting others and notes in the bridgy readme
# 18:23 aaronpk is sandeep.io the only one sending actual u-likes right now?
friedcell joined the channel
# 18:25 snarfed k, i'm off for now. thanks for signing up, glad you're on board!
# 18:25 aaronpk totally! me not accepting webmentions for short uRLs was the only thing stopping me!
snarfed joined the channel
# 18:29 aaronpk heh I need another term for bridge since you already called yours brid.gy
CheckDavid, bnvk, smus, snarfed, nightplace, ryanaz, netweb, julian`, tpinto_, HereticLocke, josephboyle, jschweinsberg and icco joined the channel
andreypopp, snarfed and indiewebcamp-vis joined the channel
# 22:26 snarfed !tell tantek hey, i'm thinking about p-like and p-repost as possible experimental properties on h-entry, as embedded likes/reposts of the parent h-entry. parallels the existing experimental p-comment property. thoughts? if so, mind giving User:Snarfed edit privileges on the mf wiki? thanks!
KartikPrabhu, bret, snarfed, friedcell, skinny, tpinto_ and obensource joined the channel