2014-07-16 UTC
lukebrooker, KartikPrabhu, chrissaad, gRegor`, nagaway, snarfed, KevinMarks, wolftune and scor joined the channel
wolftune, KartikPrabhu, KevinMarks_ and brianloveswords joined the channel
# 02:27 KartikPrabhu KevinMarks: if I ma seeing this correctly.. app.net is supposed to be an 'open' app-store?
emmak and wolftune joined the channel
# 02:45 mko POLL: Are you currently using some sort of web action override? If yes, what are you using?
wolftune, paulcp, fmarier, bnvk and snarfed joined the channel
# 03:10 KartikPrabhu mko: still no webactions on my site I'm afraid. Never got around to studying those and whether I need/want them
KevinMarks joined the channel
snarfed joined the channel
# 04:02 KartikPrabhu seems like Google Takeout does not export my Google Play books notes/highlights to the promised HTML/JSON format (it gives me the original epub I uploaded)... anyone else tried this?
# 04:09 KartikPrabhu I suspect that uploaded ebooks don't export notes but just the epub file. Will try on 'purchased' ebooks
# 04:11 bret KartikPrabhu, re Transmat.io... thats a glennjones project, the creator of the very fantastic node uF2 parser
# 04:11 KartikPrabhu bret: yes I just couldn't find if his own site runs transmat.io apparently it does!
# 04:12 bret i think it runs his own site... happy to see that a) its in hapi and b) he is doing something indiewebby that might be usable by normal people ;)
# 04:12 bret kylewm not that I know of.. aaronpk is out of town I think
# 04:13 KartikPrabhu bret: I am all for normal people usable indieweb stuff... maybe transmat.io could include his site as an example so normal people can actually see it in action
# 04:13 KartikPrabhu JonathanNeal: indieweb in general a lot has happened including this mornings discussion about photo posts
# 04:14 KartikPrabhu I'm oscillating between cleaning my code (boring...) and trying to export Google play ebook notes as marginalia on my own site :)
# 04:15 bret i think so. his work is generally really great, even though we dont hear all that much from him in irc... something I should probrally mirror more. i talk too much/read too much logs here where I should put a lot of that time into just building stuff
# 04:16 KartikPrabhu bret: it is good that people are building indieweb stuff and possibly not interacting here...
# 04:17 JonathanNeal KartikPrabhu: so you’re saying we can still build a blog or a facebook or something? =)
# 04:17 kylewm bret: have you seen a site of glenn's that has sort of a file structure? like folders containing different documents? my memory is vague :(
# 04:17 KartikPrabhu just worried that not showing a working example might dissuade potential users from giving transmat.io a serious shot which would be a shame
# 04:18 KartikPrabhu JonathanNeal: hopefully one where people can own their own data... hell yeah!
# 04:18 KartikPrabhu thought I am generally sceptical of "normal" people realising that indieweb is what is best for their data and content
# 04:18 bret !tell dietrich Heeyyyyy... wanna help host HWC tomorrow at mozilla? :)
# 04:18 Loqi Ok, I'll tell them that when I see them next
# 04:19 KartikPrabhu on second thought maybe even withknown.com could use a working example on it
# 04:19 KartikPrabhu !tell benwerd any reason withknown.com does not list your site as a working example?
# 04:19 Loqi Ok, I'll tell them that when I see them next
# 04:20 KartikPrabhu maybe it is just me but if I had something as awesome as known or transmat already working (not just talk) then I would mos def show it off!
# 04:21 KartikPrabhu particularly because people get promised things all the time with out actual action
# 04:22 bret kylewm not that I recall... just a beautiful / minimal possee / twitter client
# 04:25 bret ngoldman wanna work on indieweb stuff after work tomorrow at esri? pllzzzzzzzz :p
# 04:25 kylewm bret: yes it is gorgeous... first thing i fawned over in the Design Elements session :P
# 04:26 JonathanNeal KartikPrabhu: I was very ill last week. I feel like I have to start all over with the stuff we were talking about a few weeks ago.
# 04:26 KartikPrabhu ahh hope you're better now. starting over is a common situation in my experience
# 04:29 bret there isnt really a good place I can think of in pdx to hack in the evening
# 04:31 KartikPrabhu JonathanNeal: also it helps to take a shot at implementing things people here have already 'figured out'. Standing on the shoulders of giants so the speak
snarfed joined the channel
# 04:38 ngoldman bret: I'm in San Diego! I'm down as soon as I'm back.
# 04:41 bret ok well im just going to schedule something low key
# 04:42 bret do a hacknight/small discussions with who ever shows in a cafe. we prob wont connect with SF other than over IRC
snarfed joined the channel
# 05:06 kylewm is a total Gaiman poser. haven't even finished the book
lupinedev and scor joined the channel
# 05:15 Loqi Homebrew Website Club PDX on Wednesday, Jul 16, 5:30pm at The Waypost
KevinMarks, cweiske, squeakytoy, jsilvestre, KevinMarks_, pfefferle, KartikPrabhu and friedcell joined the channel
sankha93, jsilvestre, pfefferle, krendil and petermolnar joined the channel
Sebastien-L, danfowler, fofr, squeakytoy, KevinMarks, KevinMarks2, adactio, Tallken and jschweinsberg_ joined the channel
acegiak joined the channel
wolftune, scor and KartikPrabhu joined the channel
# 12:13 KartikPrabhu yeah I completely forgot that some listeners makes transcripts for that show! pretty awesome
Sebastien-L joined the channel
# 12:15 KartikPrabhu blergh! Comcast connection is acting up. G+ is taking so long to lonad
# 12:18 KartikPrabhu pdurbin: though I'm not really a web guy, I do get that same impression from reading articles about the web
pfefferle joined the channel
# 12:35 pdurbin KartikPrabhu: yeah, when I showed someone our redesign he said, "Ah, Bootstrap. Like everyone else. I like the old design better. More unique."
# 12:36 KartikPrabhu hmmm is this because frameworks make it easier to just not write new CSS or something?
bnvk joined the channel
xtof, pfefferle, glennjones and chrissaad joined the channel
EchoLynx joined the channel
# 14:38 acegiak was gonna ask if anyone has tried scrobbling music in an indieweb way but then i spent hours building a lastfm plugin for wordpress
gRegor`, snarfed and brianloveswords joined the channel
# 14:58 snarfed hey pfefferle, i have a wordpress-webmention question
# 14:58 snarfed i'm using the webmention_post_send, and i need the post id
# 14:59 snarfed can i get it somewhere globally? or do i need to add it as a new parameter to that hook?
# 15:06 pfefferle snarfed cann you add a default = null to the post_ID? public static function send_webmention($source, $target, $post_ID = null)
# 15:08 kylewm hai snarfed, is there a bridgy publish issue yet to check for rel=syndication if the in-reply-to is an original (non-silo) post?
# 15:09 kylewm probably posse-post-discovery would've been a much better name for this feature
KartikPrabhu1 joined the channel
# 15:19 kylewm snarfed: filing an issue. I'd be interested in working on that one, btw
pfefferle and bret joined the channel
KartikPrabhu, dariusdunlap, glennjones and wolftune joined the channel
# 15:49 kylewm hi glennjones, I've been wondering about something I thought I saw on (one of?) your site(s). my memory is a little vague, but it was like a folder hierarchy with different documents nested in the folders? is that something?
bvg, npdoty, glennjones_, lupinedev, squeakytoy2, chrissaad, Tallken, paulcp, jgarber, cweiske, scor and friedcell joined the channel
paulcp, snarfed, crossdiver, paulcp_, brianloveswords, bvg, glennjones_, jsilvestre, emmak, KevinMarks and scor joined the channel
# 17:53 peat kylewm: Ahh, dang! I can't make it tonight. Wednesdays are tough for me. Hopefully the next one!
KartikPrabhu, lupinedev, glennjones, paulcp, wolftune, chrissaad, crossdiver, krendil and grantmacken joined the channel
# 20:35 gRegor` Indeed. I think we used up all the chat yesterday.
# 20:35 gRegor` Or as I joked in #indiechat, Kartik and Kyle are away today. Hmm.
# 20:39 kylewm lol, I was trying to be good and stay offline
# 20:40 kylewm and i go back and check and I was still the last person to say anything
fmarier joined the channel
# 20:42 kylewm snarfed: in the generated twitter bridgy pages, has u-photo always been outside of e-content?
# 20:45 snarfed activitystreams-unofficial interprets twitter pictures as attachments, which are rendered outside e-content
dariusdunlap joined the channel
# 20:45 kylewm interesting! I'm wondering if I should render them that way on my site too
# 20:46 kylewm that e-content is the caption only, and u-photo is the photo only
# 20:46 snarfed i don't personally care one way or the other, happy to merge any PR
# 20:46 snarfed (in general, i blindly implement any mf2 anyone tells me to :P)
# 20:47 mko Yeah, though that's for a "Note with Photo." a "Photo" I still feel is where e-content and u-photo are equivalent.
# 20:47 gRegor` If we're sticking with post-types, I think the u-photo outside the e-content is good for photo posts.
# 20:47 mko Sometimes Loqi takes so long to respond, I think it's just aaronpk being bored.
# 20:47 mko And then other times it's immediate.
# 20:48 mko I'm not going to go into it again. I want to get this damn site live and then I can just document what I did and people can tell me I'm wrong. ;)
# 20:49 gRegor` Haha, I think we're in agreement actually.
pauloppenheim joined the channel
# 20:49 kylewm just that's the first example i've noticed where it's an attachment and not part of the content
# 20:50 mko Gotcha. It's that way on the Facebook API as well.
# 20:51 mko And the text content is in "message" (Facebook's version of "content")
caseorganic joined the channel
lukebrooker joined the channel
# 21:27 emmak and apparently whether its inside or outside, it will be interpreted the same by a microformats parser
# 21:31 KartikPrabhu emmak: the mf2 will be the same but the content.html property will have an image
glennjones_, paulcp and npdoty joined the channel
# 21:46 npdoty is there any harm done if a page (for example, the index page of your blog) contains two <a> tags, both with rel="in-reply-to", pointing to different URLs?
# 21:48 gRegor` You can have multiple in-reply-to URLs for a single post, yes.
# 21:50 npdoty I'm thinking more the case where a blog might show the complete contents of multiple posts
# 21:50 gRegor` If they're each marked up correctly, they'll get inside an h-entry
# 21:50 gRegor` So the in-repl-to will be set on the nearest h-* parent
# 21:51 KartikPrabhu npdoty: rel is scoped to the entire page so even if the rel="in-reply-to" is inside the h-entry it will be for the whole page
# 21:51 npdoty even if I scope them to different h-entry values, it seems like technically I'm misusing rel
# 21:51 gRegor` Ohhh, rel=in-reply-to? Misread that
# 21:52 KartikPrabhu npdoty: yes. so use the microformat equivalent which is scoped to individual hentries and not the whole page
# 21:53 gRegor` Heading out. See you in a bit, KartikPrabhu
# 21:53 npdoty the webmention protocol doesn't rely on rel=in-reply-to?
# 21:53 npdoty ah, webmention just requires that there is a link of some kind to the target
# 21:54 npdoty okay, cool. so it sounds like rel="in-reply-to" isn't necessary for anything?
# 21:55 KartikPrabhu so I would put a <a href="..." class="u-in-reply-to"> inside an h-entry so that the receiver knows it is a reply and not a generic mention
# 21:56 npdoty ah, I guess I was following the indiewebcamp.com page on replies, which states that rel=in-reply-to is required
# 21:57 npdoty right, so I could change the content so that a rel=in-reply-to is present on the permalink page but isn't present when the content is presented in a feed with multiple entries ...
paulcp joined the channel
# 22:05 KartikPrabhu npdoty: the point being the u-in-reply-to will work on both the permalink pages and the streams pages so it is easier to maintain
# 22:06 npdoty KartikPrabhu, right, I'm just not sure if any services are relying on rel="in-reply-to" to identify a reply
# 22:07 npdoty will the post on werd.io that I just replied to recognize my page as a reply if it uses u-in-reply-to rather than a rel?
# 22:07 npdoty if no one is using software that relies on rel="in-reply-to" then maybe we should remove that from the recommendations on the wiki
lukebrooker, tilgovi, emmak_, chrissaad, glennjones, fmarier, gRegor` and paulcp joined the channel
# 23:07 mko !tell aaronpk When you've got a few minutes to chat, I'd love to understand better how to enable authentication for micropub. I didn't actually realize IndieAuth provided a bearer/access token.
# 23:07 Loqi Ok, I'll tell them that when I see them next
# 23:19 bret mko for micropub, i think a different server does the token stuff
# 23:20 mko bret: Does anyone have a working micropub instance? I thought somebody did, but couldn't find it when I went searching for it.
# 23:21 mko Hm. The explanation on the wiki is rather vague as to how authentication is handled. How did you two handle it?
# 23:21 bret we REALLY need to sit down some weekend and clean all that up
# 23:22 bret the authorization_endpoiont, the token_endpoint or the micropub endpoint
# 23:22 mko bret: my own endpoint and a UI for other people to post to their own micropub endpoints from my entry pages (i.e. posting to their site from mine)
# 23:23 mko Yeah. Client and my own micropub endpoint.
KartikPrabhu joined the channel
# 23:26 mko emmak_: Yep. I've already got the simple Webmention form available and the entire set of reply UI wrapped in a web action, but I wanted to set up a full round-trip of IndieWeb commenting from the view page.
# 23:26 emmak_ there was a discussion on trust-less micropub, which sounds like what you are looking for, but i don't think its been fleshed out yet
# 23:27 bret barnaby does something like storing the token in a client side cookie
gRegor`_ joined the channel
# 23:28 mko Yeah. I've got that set up already (sort of). Like, anyone could listen for these micropub posts and just choose whether to post them or not based on the referrer, but I'd rather handle the post directly and have the post appear on both sites moments after using the interface.
# 23:29 bret emmak_ I couldn't find a space last minute for HWC so I just posted an event to calagator at the waypost
# 23:29 bret kinda out of the relative to downtown
# 23:30 Loqi bret meant to say: kinda out of the wayrelative to downtown
# 23:30 gRegor`_ Chicago HWC in session
# 23:31 gRegor`_ Awaiting our first newcomer
# 23:31 kylewm mko: I played with micropub comments on my site... it's problematic right now that to comment, people would have to give me write access to THEIR site
# 23:32 kylewm of course, I trust barnaby not to do something sketchy with my access token a hell of a lot more than most of the twitter apps i give permissions to
# 23:32 emmak_ bret: not sure if i'll be able to make it out there tonight
# 23:33 mko They control their micropub endpoint. If they want to create flood or abuse protection on their endpoint, that's easy to do, and granting access should only allow for certain activities (i.e. only posting replies or only posting replies, likes, favorites, bookmarks)
# 23:33 bret caseorganic are you and aaronpk back in pdx?
# 23:34 kylewm bret: isn't aaronpk the person who publically logs his gps coordinates down to the minute?
# 23:36 gRegor` !tell benwerd You don't accept HEAD requests to werd.io?
# 23:36 Loqi Ok, I'll tell them that when I see them next
# 23:38 bret mko same as the tokens.oauth.net I think
# 23:39 kylewm I think tokens.indieauth.com is preferred ...
# 23:40 kylewm not sure ,he mentioned something about overloading oauth.net feeling a little wrong
KartikPrabhu joined the channel
# 23:41 mko To be fair, I was confused when first implementing IndieAuth because I'm so used to generating access tokens during authentication, so it makes a lot more sense to me to be on IndieAuth, since that's the authentication provider.
# 23:51 gRegor` New HWC attendee hasn't shown up yet. :/
KartikPrabhu and scor joined the channel