KartikPrabhukylewm: yeah. I don't care about CMSs (they get in the way) and write HTML files for articles myself. But everyone having the same thing Twitter, G+ etc... makes every one look/do the same things so no creativity there
j12t, friedcell, Erkan_Yilmaz and musigny joined the channel
LoqiWelcome to news about the IndieWeb where recent notable articles about the IndieWeb are cited and linked to keep you up to date http://indiewebcamp.com/going_on
reedstrmbear: that is not a post - it's a ... dissertation? mini-autobiography? Discursive personal mediation on the history of computing and personal interactions? And yes .. excellent!
tantekbear, reedstrm hmm - I had a different reaction: looks like just some old-person reminiscing that has nothing to do with how people use computers today. Meh. (and I'm old enough to get all the references)
reedstrmtantek: I'm the same .. vintage? but there's nuggets of insight in there, many tagged by others. What's the comment engine being used? Is that something open source?
tantekreedstrm: I didn't find any new nuggets of insight. Just the same ol' "disconnect", "unplug", "remember when", "constraints were good", "simpler was good" etc.
reedstrmYes there's lots of that - but don't skim too lightly. Could use a good copyedit, except it's not a "I want to convince you" post, it's a "my friend died and I'm thinking about his effect on my life and my world" sort of thing, so I'll cut him the editorial slack.
reedstrmAlso, to my reading, the punchline is the _first_ paragraph of the 10/10 entry, above the teddy bear. "By my lights, people very often share technologies with each other when they talk. Strategies. Ideas for living our lives."
tantekI'm going to challenge any/all of you who support/want/like the idea of "native" comments that you self-host on your site from "anyone with an email address" to try posting a sensible critique of GamerGate, and see if you can deal with the coordinated creative writing concern-trolling / sock-puppeting attack that results. E.g. comments section on: https://openstandard.mozilla.org/yes-gamergate-is-a-ed-tech-issue/
snarfedtantek: i'll happily decline that challenge. :P maybe not the best test subject, at least for me. i have no interest in discussing gamergate online
snarfedas a counterpoint, i'd argue that comments (whether native or otherwise) don't always have to be about Serious Dialogue. this is maybe one of my favorite posts with native comments. no meaningful discussion to be had, but i still very much appreciate the trivial "thank you!" comments: https://snarfed.org/sole-elliptical-need-lube-message
tantekpoint was more about vulnerability of unverified email based "native" comments to a coordinated creative writing concern-trolling / sock-puppeting attack
snarfedand just to confirm, vouch is the only thing we've worked on that begins to address this problem, right? in other words, for this specific problem, wm + mf2 is no better than native, right?
reedstrmtantek I see no technical issues w/ that set of comments. It's only a few hiundred, came in over a reasonable time frame. I took "deal with" to mean, handle the technical load. If you're talking about not wanting to host comments you don't agree with, well, ...
tantekso yeah, if you don't care about fake comments, people creative writing in your comments with made-up identities, pretending to be talking factually while making stuff up, then yeah, no problem ;)
reedstrmRight, so it's not a technical load issue, it's the social/quality discussion issue. There's only so far technical solutions can impact social issues. Adding a cost seems like a good solution, but seldom works. (captcha, anyone?)
tantekthere was a quote somewhere from a recent blog post about this that I think KevinMarks cited - if you have to moderate the trolling, the trolling has already succeeded.
reedstrmWell, so far that level of gamesmanship hasn't made it here. It's a global shared resource educational content site, so yes, we do have staff, but we'd much rather be doing anything else than moderate content.
tantekreedstrm: not suggesting, saying. If you were made to see the spam/abuse, the spam/abuse has already happened, even if it is only in your moderation UI.
tantek!tell KevinMarks_: what was that article you cited that said something like "if you have to moderate the trolling, the trolling has already succeeded." ?
tantek!tell KevinMarks what was that article you cited that said something like "if you have to moderate the trolling, the trolling has already succeeded." ?
KartikPrabhureedstrm: I mean, the indieweb idea is to have your own site act pretty much like your Twitter account does now. There have been many cases where the Twitter comments have been too much to handle
reedstrmSpam that never gets published for the world to see did not succeed, even if the person whose site it is does see it when moderating: the spammers goal is broader distribution. Abuse on the other hand ...