j12t, musigny, willowbl00 and KartikPrabhu joined the channel
#KartikPrabhukylewm: yeah. I don't care about CMSs (they get in the way) and write HTML files for articles myself. But everyone having the same thing Twitter, G+ etc... makes every one look/do the same things so no creativity there
j12t, friedcell, Erkan_Yilmaz and musigny joined the channel
#KevinMarks__Well, the early blog tools let you write html in your posts; they forced you to really
krendil joined the channel
#KevinMarks__That's something Facebook g+ and twitter subtracted
danfowler and cweiske joined the channel
#KartikPrabhuKevinMarks_ yes but CMSs haven't evolved much with their UI comapred to G+ and others
petermolnar, pfefferle, KartikPrabhu, Sebastien-L, kensanata, friedcell, EOGreer, modem, joskar, j12t, csarven, gr0k, musigny and willowbl00 joined the channel
#LoqiWelcome to news about the IndieWeb where recent notable articles about the IndieWeb are cited and linked to keep you up to date http://indiewebcamp.com/going_on
#GWGPfefferle, I have pushed a function to my fork of Semantic Linkbacks with a count function.
#pfefferleGWG Yes, I saw it… fixed some intends and will push it later… thanks :)
#GWGI was going to say that I was having trouble with it.
#GWGThe query should work according to the literature, but was being inconsistent in testing.
#reedstrmbear: that is not a post - it's a ... dissertation? mini-autobiography? Discursive personal mediation on the history of computing and personal interactions? And yes .. excellent!
#bearreedstrm - I was avoiding the more accurate description so as not to scare any one off - I want everyone to read it and absorb it
#bearbecause the networks without networks idea fits into indieweb oh so perfectly IMO
#reedstrmIt is in fact excellent - don't let me scare anyone either!
#tantekbear, reedstrm hmm - I had a different reaction: looks like just some old-person reminiscing that has nothing to do with how people use computers today. Meh. (and I'm old enough to get all the references)
snarfed joined the channel
#j12tBTW, Indie Box / UBOS meetup tomorrow in Mountain View.
#reedstrmtantek: I'm the same .. vintage? but there's nuggets of insight in there, many tagged by others. What's the comment engine being used? Is that something open source?
#tantekreedstrm: I didn't find any new nuggets of insight. Just the same ol' "disconnect", "unplug", "remember when", "constraints were good", "simpler was good" etc.
#tantekmaybe I've just seen too many of these cycles of reminiscing
#reedstrmYes there's lots of that - but don't skim too lightly. Could use a good copyedit, except it's not a "I want to convince you" post, it's a "my friend died and I'm thinking about his effect on my life and my world" sort of thing, so I'll cut him the editorial slack.
#reedstrmAlso, to my reading, the punchline is the _first_ paragraph of the 10/10 entry, above the teddy bear. "By my lights, people very often share technologies with each other when they talk. Strategies. Ideas for living our lives."
#tantekI'm going to challenge any/all of you who support/want/like the idea of "native" comments that you self-host on your site from "anyone with an email address" to try posting a sensible critique of GamerGate, and see if you can deal with the coordinated creative writing concern-trolling / sock-puppeting attack that results. E.g. comments section on: https://openstandard.mozilla.org/yes-gamergate-is-a-ed-tech-issue/
#snarfedtantek: i'll happily decline that challenge. :P maybe not the best test subject, at least for me. i have no interest in discussing gamergate online
#tanteksnarfed, no problem, and quite understandable.
#snarfedas a counterpoint, i'd argue that comments (whether native or otherwise) don't always have to be about Serious Dialogue. this is maybe one of my favorite posts with native comments. no meaningful discussion to be had, but i still very much appreciate the trivial "thank you!" comments: https://snarfed.org/sole-elliptical-need-lube-message
#tanteksnarfed: strawman, never said comments have to always be about "Serious Dialogue"
#tantekpoint was more about vulnerability of unverified email based "native" comments to a coordinated creative writing concern-trolling / sock-puppeting attack
#snarfedand just to confirm, vouch is the only thing we've worked on that begins to address this problem, right? in other words, for this specific problem, wm + mf2 is no better than native, right?
#reedstrmtantek I see no technical issues w/ that set of comments. It's only a few hiundred, came in over a reasonable time frame. I took "deal with" to mean, handle the technical load. If you're talking about not wanting to host comments you don't agree with, well, ...
fmarier joined the channel
#tantekreedstrm: except that they're basically all fake
#tantekso yeah, if you don't care about fake comments, people creative writing in your comments with made-up identities, pretending to be talking factually while making stuff up, then yeah, no problem ;)
#snarfed(i'd actually interpreted the "Not Serious" criticism from a while back, not from "nonsense," but no matter, not important)
#tantekwhether the objective is political (gamergate gang-sock-puppeting) or monetary (spamming) the method is the same, (semi-)automated, non-factual.
#tanteksnarfed - perhaps mixed with the serious/nonserious conversation we had about "short" notes/tweets?
#reedstrmRight, so it's not a technical load issue, it's the social/quality discussion issue. There's only so far technical solutions can impact social issues. Adding a cost seems like a good solution, but seldom works. (captcha, anyone?)
#tantekreedstrm: part of the point of /vouch is to avoid having to moderate so much noise in the first place.
#tantekthere was a quote somewhere from a recent blog post about this that I think KevinMarks cited - if you have to moderate the trolling, the trolling has already succeeded.
#reedstrmWhich we only do for the first publish from new accounts, so we verify/validate ... sort of a vouch.
#reedstrmOnce there "work" didn't appear immediately, the spammers headed elsewhere, mostly. So it's not a huge cost for us.
#tantekreedstrm: many spammers first publish something plausible in a comment, then spam sometime *much* later
#tantekalso it sounds like you're talking about a group/company blog where someone is paid to human moderate
#tantekI'm specifically talking about the indieweb use-case. one person, personal site, personal blog, self-moderation.
#tantek(since you said "not a huge cost for *us*" *emphasis* added)
#reedstrmWell, so far that level of gamesmanship hasn't made it here. It's a global shared resource educational content site, so yes, we do have staff, but we'd much rather be doing anything else than moderate content.
#tantekreedstrm: it's like they're picking very high readership targets first. hence Mozilla/Firefox. and online high-traffic publications, Kotaku etc.
#reedstrmYes, but that's a matter of scale. You're suggesting that for a personal site, any cost at all is too much?
EOGreer joined the channel
#tantekreedstrm: not suggesting, saying. If you were made to see the spam/abuse, the spam/abuse has already happened, even if it is only in your moderation UI.
#KartikPrabhureedstrm: if your site is to act like your Twitter then there have been instances of this
#tantek!tell KevinMarks_: what was that article you cited that said something like "if you have to moderate the trolling, the trolling has already succeeded." ?
#tantek!tell KevinMarks what was that article you cited that said something like "if you have to moderate the trolling, the trolling has already succeeded." ?
#KartikPrabhureedstrm: I mean, the indieweb idea is to have your own site act pretty much like your Twitter account does now. There have been many cases where the Twitter comments have been too much to handle
#reedstrmMy personal experience doesn't really lend itself to the trolling/abuse side, since it's not comments/personal per se.
#KartikPrabhuso it is not a question of organisation vs individuals, except it is harder for individuals to manage/moderate it
#aaronpkspeaking of vouch, I think indiewebcat should reject un-vouched webmentions as a test for us here :)
#reedstrmSpam that never gets published for the world to see did not succeed, even if the person whose site it is does see it when moderating: the spammers goal is broader distribution. Abuse on the other hand ...
#ben_thatmustbemeaaronpk, i ignore non-vouch non-whitelist webmentions