simonv3, snarfed and interactivist joined the channel
#tantek.comedited /like (+911) "-(), FB used thumb til 2013 rede, Friendfeed introduced like button 2007 with a link, see also Wikipedia article on like button" (view diff)
#tantek.comedited /favorite (+350) "/* Silo Examples */ Flickr may have been first to do "favorite" button, "favorites" collection. Note Twitter history of UI screenshots." (view diff)
#GWGpwcc: I just figured out how to eliminate a bunch of redundant code
#pwccGWG: It is looking good. How are you finding kinds v formats?
KartikPrabhu1, cweiske, Jihaisse, joshwnj, loic_m_, csarven, simonv3_, pfefferle, eschnou and krendil joined the channel
#@tContinued iteration on #indieweb likes: further clustering adjacent likes of same source by not repeating their name. (ttk.me t4_F1) (twitter.com/_/status/557464347711406080)
#cweisketantek, do you have an example post for that?
#tantekcweiske - not *an example* post no, because it is only when likes are *adjacent* posts. you can see it on my home page now where it starts with "likes @Eliservescent’s tweet "
#jonnybarnesso how does licensing work with webmentions? i.e. if I license my content CC0 and some one comments and the license on their site is CC-by-sa 4.0 or whatever, does it become CC0 when being served and displayed on my site?
shiflett joined the channel
#voxpellijonnybarnes: You only quote the mentions, right?
#KartikPrabhujonnybarnes: why not check rel-license on the permalink page and decide from there on? I have been thinking about this for "likes" / "favs" of photos. I am sure this can be automated if the re-license is appropriately markdup but not sure how
#jonnybarnesKartikPrabhu: and indeed mr. waterpigs does have a rel-license on his page
#KartikPrabhumr.waterpigs being barnabywalters here :)
#gRegor`rel-license would definitely be better than robots.txt
#cweiskerobots.txt is the better approach for that
#KartikPrabhucweiske: errr no. I was talking about the use-case
cmhobbs joined the channel
#KartikPrabhucweiske: while robots.txt is fine for search engines, it isn't suitable for determining copyright and whether you a human can embed it as a reply/response-context on your own site
#voxpelliI don't think lawyers and stuff really care about whether a pattern is a good one or an anti-pattern – they mostly care about established pattern and if eg. robots.txt tells that a URL shouldn't be scraped then that could likely carry some significance in court – I have a slight memory of hearing about court cases where that was true a few years back
#voxpelliand unless you're just looking for the intent of the author but rather looking at whether you have the right to embed something then such parameters probably matter
prtksxna joined the channel
#gRegor`Hopefully people who don't want their content embedded don't send a webmention
#gRegor`Especially if they're using mf2 markup with an in-reply-to
#Loqiaaronpk: gRegor` left you a message 1 hour, 14 minutes ago: Not sure there's any way around it, but I created /robots.txt wiki page and the rewrite displays the actual IWC robots.txt
#ben_thatmustbemegRegor`, voxpelli i don't think you need anything to specifically say not to embed this text, if they wanted that they could make the whole site an image, or use JS. people could just copy paste normal text anyway
#voxpelliwould love to find a JS-enabled indie-crawler that accidentaly occupies itself crawling an endless path down the tree of a js-based bitcoin miner
#tantekpresumably at the end of processing the JS, you get the crawler to attempt to retrieve/spider a "success_uniqueID.html" page for when it finds a bitcoin, or "fail_uniqueID.html" page when it doesn't.
#tantekthen all your server does is kick back, present JSON math problems to solve, and let the crawlers pick success/fail for you instead of doing the math yourself
#tantekor heck - why aren't people already doing this and letting browser JS load success page as iframe vs. failure page as iframe to communicate the result back to the server?
#voxpelliyeah, I'm not sure how to really avoid that unless you ensure to never crawl a URL created by the JS
#kylewm.comcreated /PDX (+152) "Created page with "{{stub}} <dfn>PDX</dfn> is the airport code for Portland International Airport, and a metonymy for the city of [[Portland|Portland, Oregon]] as a whole."" (view diff)
#tanteknow that compute time is monetizable per bitcoin mining, I can't wait for sites to use JS embeds to do so with everyone's browsers "for free", thus forcing people down the path of NoScript like solutions, thus forcing webdev back to progressive enhancement for anything to work at all
#kylewm.comcreated /Portland (+209) "Created page with "{{stub}} <dfn>Portland</dfn> (sometimes [[PDX]]) is a city in the US state of Oregon and the site of the [[2011|inaugural IndieWebCamp]]. There is a Portland [[Homebrew Website C..."" (view diff)
#gRegor`Re: /block and notifying the user they're blocked, I think it's not a bad idea. Presuming it's an authenticated service like Twitter, they're going to figure it out whether you tell them explicitly, or they just suddenly cannot see your tweets.
#gRegor`A /mute shouldn't notify the user of course
#gRegor`block on twitter also forces them to unfollow you, so that's a part that doesn't carry over to indieweb, really
#aaronpkif i'm going to block someone, I would want to basically silently disappear
#aaronpkthe "you are blocked" message that you see when viewing someone's twitter profile who has blocked you seems oddly aggressive
#gRegor`The forced unfollow would be an indicator, though most wouldn't realize it for a while I'm sure.
#voxpelliagree, perhaps it works better for people with private accounts? (because those still exists at Twitter, right? Or am I imagining things?)
#gRegor`Plus people have reported Twitter randomly unfollowing people
#voxpelliblocking makes little sense with public accounts, muting would be the more sensible option
#gRegor`I think if a private account blocks you, since it forces the unfollow, you'd only see "this account is private" instead of "you have been blocked"
#voxpelli!tell tantek Launched the base fix on my WebMention endpoint now – and also launched the possibility to update mentions – so go ahead and re-ping KevinMarks and it should hopefully all work! (In realtime!)
#LoqiTantek__: voxpelli left you a message 27 minutes ago: Launched the base fix on my WebMention endpoint now – and also launched the possibility to update mentions – so go ahead and re-ping KevinMarks and it should hopefully all work! (In realtime!)
#aaronpki coudln't figure out how to turn the other one into a question
#aaronpkit's also not documented there anyway, so figured that'd be good
#Tantek__It's a high barrier because we have high respect for creators's time.