#LukasRos!tell Jeena I liked your post about the IndieWebCamp so I wanted to literally ”žlike“ it and realized you have no rel=”žwebmention“ on the site so I had to send it manually.
#Zegnat!tell LukasRos Jeena sends a Link HTTP header with rel="webmention" on all of his pages, HTML elements are not the only acceptable way to link to a webmention endpoint.
#mrhenkoDoes anyone here use the "Indieweb Post Kinds" plugin for WordPress?
#ZegnatLukasRos: Jeena sends a Link HTTP header with rel="webmention" on all of his pages, HTML elements are not the only acceptable way to link to a webmention endpoint.
#LukasRosAlright … so the fault is my own webmention implementation which did not support it yet …
#LoqiLukasRos: Zegnat left you a message 2 hours, 46 minutes ago: Jeena sends a Link HTTP header with rel="webmention" on all of his pages, HTML elements are not the only acceptable way to link to a webmention endpoint. http://indiewebcamp.com/irc/2015-08-15/line/1439637272757
#LukasRosI was just checking for the HTML element.
#ZegnatYeah, a pretty big part of the spec is there just to tell you all the possibilities of endpoint discovery. It is the only part of the spec I think is convoluted
#Loqi[mention] Kyle Mahan wrote a post that linked to an event: Homebrew
#Loqi[mention] Darius Dunlap, Ben Werdmüller, Tantek Çelik, Ilya Kreymer, Benjamin Michael Goering, Ryan Barrett, Andi Galpern, Dan Lyke, Justin Ormont, Katarzyna Babula, Dan Gailey, Lauren Buchman, and Eva Lee were invited to an event: Homebrew
#Loqi[mention] Kyle Mahan, Kevin Marks, and Kat Lucky RSVPd yes to an event: Homebrew
frzn, snarfed, cleverdevil, snarfed1, squeakytoy, wolftune, jonnybarnes and almereyda joined the channel
#mrhenkoGWG: Yeah, I asked for someone with experience using the WP plugin "Indieweb Post Kinds". I think I solved the problem myself, but thanks anyway.
#KevinMarksmrhenko: if you can describe what went wrong and what you did to fix it, GWG may be able to improve it for people in future
#KevinMarks(these kinds of user experience reports are really useful)
#mrhenkoI was looking for a way the enable more post kinds (repost etc.) and didn't realize that "Enable Link Sharing Kinds" included the kinds I was looking for.
#mrhenkoMaybe a short text under the "Enable Link Sharing Kinds" option that explains which posts kinds this refers to would be nice.
j12t and cleverdevil joined the channel
#GWGmrhenko: Sorry for the delay. I was having lunch.
#GWGI plan to change the feature to allow full customization of the list in the next version
#GWGInstead of Link Sharing, you'd have a checkbox for each kind.
#GWGI am working on a big cleanup of the code eight now. Bugfixes, etc.
#GWGBeen slowed by hurting my arm, which is slowing my typing
#GWGmrhenko: Any other suggestions? I keep trying to refine it.
#mrhenkoGWG: The main problem I have with it, and all other IndieWeb Camp plugins, is a lack of short and concise about text. There are tons of things to read on the IWC wiki but the plugins themselves could benefit from succinct descriptions of what they do and how they works.
#mrhenkoGWG: For instance, regarding the post kinds: Is it possible to add arbitrary post kinds? If so, how?
#GWGI support it by plugin at the moment, but not interface.
#mrhenkoMy current focus is to my site "IndieWebified", but once that is done maybe I can put some time towards working on documentation. Now promises, though.
#GWGThere are a bunch I haven't coded. Checkin, travel, event, etc.
#GWGmrhenko: Any way I can help, tell me. I have the goal of improving the WordPress Indieweb experience
#mrhenkoThat's ("Checkin", "travel" etc.) what I meant. A simple way for the user to define those and other that might be added to the spec later would be nice.
#mrhenkoIt seems to include my quote from your original post. Is that a problem that you or other people here have seen before? I use the Indieweb WebMention plugin for WebMentions.
#GWGI've used both embedding inside and outside of the content.
#GWGMy current preferred technique is to wrap the content in an e-content div at a high priority.
#mrhenkoIn my case the theme is my own so I can make changes to it. But as far as I know the in-reply-to part is inserted by one of the IWC plugins using a filter for "the_content".
#GWGI added e-content in my theme as a filter at top priority
#GWGI tried other ways, but this was the way I found didn't mess up with other plugins
#mrhenko(It's getting late here and I'm tired so maybe this is a dumb question. Please bare with me.) I use a <div> with e-content as a class and inside that I use the_content() in a php tag. Is there a difference in results between our ways?
#GWGIf you surround the_content with it in the theme, you end up getting any plugin that embeds infromation inside the_content showing up in your replies
#GWGThat's why I wrap it in at priority 1. Default is priority 10. It guarantees any third-party plugin information is outside the e-content block.
#GWGI originally built the e-content into the theme file, but I kept having issues with the results.
#mrhenkoOkay, so if I do it with a filter instead I would get the <div> with p-in-reply-to from the plugin as a separate element on the same level as my "e-content" div, instead of inside it?