2015-11-16 UTC
# 00:00 tantek oh I should do a recrawl now that I have syndication links!
scor joined the channel
# 00:09 tantek snarfed - re: surprised - one thing I've considered is building a (semi-)private "notifications" page that aggregates all my webmentions for me to quickly check (like a dashboard), before I build the per-page displaying stuff (which I think is more work)
[snarfed] joined the channel
# 00:12 [snarfed] short answer: right now the response retry buttons trigger it
benborges joined the channel
# 00:23 GWG snarfed: A lot of have no ux instincts
# 00:24 tantek GWG, that puts you way ahead of most developers, who don't even know that they have no ux instincs.
# 00:24 GWG Well, what is one step above no, but well below average?
snarfed joined the channel
# 00:25 GWG I've worked with near computer illiterate people for many years. I know how to anticipate their issues.
nitot joined the channel
# 00:25 tantek GWG, developing such empathy is *essential* for becoming good at UX
# 00:26 tantek so you're even farther along than you may realize
# 00:28 tantek snarfed: hmm - didn't see any recrawl from clicking the "reload" button next to my most recent "Responses" item
# 00:30 snarfed ah, it's reluctant if it's never found a synd url for you before
# 00:32 tantek yes it would have never found a syndication URL to IG for me before today :)
snarfed joined the channel
# 00:35 GWG I wonder if I should join Instagram
# 00:35 tantek GWG - some of us have found it to be a useful client for posting - since you have Micropub support, you may want to consider a private IG account purely as a client for ownyourgram/micropub to your own site
# 00:36 tantek right now I'm manually PESOSing from IG to my site, and then automatically POSSEing that to FB & Twitter with Bridgy Publish
# 00:39 GWG I haven't gotten Micropub Photo Posting set up.
# 00:40 GWG It's on my list as part of the rewrite I'm trying to do to get to unit testing, which I promised snarfed.
# 00:42 GWG snarfed: Did I tell you what I was doing?
# 00:48 GWG Your design had the generation of data directly called by the query parser. I switched it, partly to make the unit tests easier, to being attached to the before and after micropub hooks you had.
sparverius joined the channel
[snarfed] joined the channel
# 01:04 [snarfed] yeah, i considered that. trying to minimize separate user actions/affordances. maybe this deserve one, but I'm not sure
# 01:04 tantek I figured as an inline button it would be pretty unobtrusive - as much as the subtle [ Poll now ] button is
# 01:05 tantek as an inline UI element, it's pretty easily missable/skippable (which is what you want in such a specific user action/affordance)
# 01:05 tantek such a Crawl Now button would only really stand out if you were reading the specific "web site crawled... " text - in which case it is contextually relevant
# 01:06 tantek wow I need to document my brainstorms for plain text person-tag authoring!
sparverius and snarfed joined the channel
# 01:17 tantek snarfed: I'm wondering if the Bridgy Publish FB person tagging will have the side-effect of working for page-tagging too
# 01:20 tantek looks for snarfed's mention in his notifications, and gets "The link you followed may be broken, or the page may have been removed."
# 01:21 snarfed huh interesting. i published it with privacy "just you"
# 01:21 snarfed it showed you anyway? i guess since you were tagged
# 01:21 tantek yeah, it showed up in my "globe" notifications drop down
mblaney joined the channel
wolftune joined the channel
# 01:23 mblaney It's funny reading back, I added person-tags to my reader yesterday.
# 01:25 mblaney I did that because it was displaying "array" instead of a category for one of aaronpk
# 01:26 mblaney so I looked into it and realised I wasn't parsing the h-card for the category, which it does now :-)
nitot joined the channel
# 01:26 tantek snarfed: hah - I think we're close enough to be not really be considered independent ;)
# 01:27 snarfed eh maybe. many scientific communities are similar, and still accept it when it happens
# 01:27 mblaney now I can consume person-tags, but can't tag anyone myself.... so now I want to add that.
# 01:27 tantek I think given that we're in the same IRC channel and use the same wiki it's less surprising ;)
# 01:30 tantek the problem with the "it's the environment!" excuse is that if that were so, then it should apply to everyone in such environments - which in practice it doesn't
# 01:30 tantek thus it doesn't matter if people are product of their environment (as in "so what?"), because everyone is, and thus it doesn't in anyway lessen the contributions of individuals
# 01:31 snarfed it definitely matters when your job is making public policy
# 01:31 snarfed "get rid of the bad apples" vs "change the systemic incentives" are extremely different answers to problems
# 01:31 tantek really? I see them as strongly complementary!
sammachin joined the channel
# 01:32 snarfed well, and also techniques to try to reorient them
# 01:32 snarfed eh. i guess i just believe much more in incentives and systems than exceptional individuals (on either end)
# 01:33 tantek if the incentives and systems were so powerful then they would have affectted more of the people that are surrouned by them
# 01:33 tantek the fact that only a few stand out is evidence in and of itself that something special is going on
# 01:33 snarfed incentives are always powerful, we just rarely tune them right to get the ends we want
# 01:34 tantek ^^^ but that's exactly why individual achievement is remarkable - because such incentives are rarely tuned anyway!
# 01:34 snarfed sure. again though, when i think about whole ecosystems, i want to think about incentives to get better results from *everyone*, rather than fetishizing the exceptional people
ben_thatmustbeme and Kongaloosh joined the channel
# 01:35 tantek snarfed - agreed - incentives to get better results from people by default is better UX design, and more sustainable :)
bergie and jacus joined the channel
myfreeweb, mlncn and reidab joined the channel
# 01:38 tantek snarfed, I do strongly believe in structure/incentives/culture as an important baseline and in practice what matters the most, hence when there are individuals that are able to consciously go against and think outside those default, *and* achieve, that I think it is worth noting
halorgium, minsky, sensiblemn and Gold joined the channel
jden joined the channel
# 01:41 tantek the next photo I have queued up to post has no people in it, but is of a red starbucks cup (decorated), thus if I was going to tag it with anything I would tag it with #starbucks.com(@starbucks,Facebook/Starbucks)
# 01:42 tantek ^^^ yes that's a bit of brainstorm syntax for plain-text multi-url-identity-tagging
# 01:42 snarfed just fyi for bridgy publish right now you'd need to use their page (user) id, which may be hard to find :(
# 01:43 tantek sure, that "Facebook/Starbucks" in the plain text would be converted by auto_link to <a class="u-category" href="https://www.facebook.com/Starbucks/">(f icon)</a>
tommorris and [snarfed] joined the channel
# 01:48 [snarfed] part of preventing multiple apps from joining their fb user dbs
bret joined the channel
# 01:55 tantek got it. <meta property="al:android:url" content="fb://page/22092443056" />
# 01:57 tantek so the question remains is <a class="u-category" href="https://www.facebook.com/22092443056">f</a> good enough for Bridgy Publish to use fo page-tagging?
# 01:59 tantek sure - but if I *only* used the FB URL for the page-tag
# 01:59 tantek that should still work without the h-card right?
# 02:03 Loqi lazinessdrivendevelopment has 1 karma
KartikPrabhu joined the channel
# 02:13 aaronpk now in addition to following someone, you can click "see first" and their new posts will show up at the top of the news feed when you open it
# 02:14 aaronpk maybe. I actually prefer my method of having multiple channels I follow
# 02:15 tantek am going to go to some in-person clean-up while I let that brainstorm simmer and come back to it
# 02:15 tantek aaronpk: see above about snarfed getting person-tagging working in Bridgy Publish to FB, and about the page id limitation
# 02:16 tantek snarfed: wait does that mean Bridgy Publish person-tagging needs e.g. facebook.com/214611 instead of facebook.com/tantek.celik ?
# 02:17 tantek (also available by same not-logged in curl / view source -> <meta property="al:android:url" content="fb://profile/..." )
# 02:18 tantek either way - same id space as fb.com/id works
# 02:18 tantek (for linking to it to redirect to the named page)
# 02:19 tantek I feel like solving cross-silo person-tagging is a major federated social web use-case that pretty much no one else is thinking about or solving with any serious attempt (certainly no one else in W3C Social Web WG has gotten that far outside of the indiewebcamp explorations)
nitot and [snarfed] joined the channel
# 02:46 [snarfed] tantek: bridgy person tagging uses domains and fb usernames when it knows them for a bridgy user
# 03:00 tantek thus the simplest test would be a photo of a single person that is a bridgy user that has signed into Bridgy with FB
hober joined the channel
# 03:01 tantek sure. photo is the more compelling use case for person-tagging :)
# 03:01 tantek and hopefully Twitter too - so that from that person's personal URL, Bridgy Publish can person-tag them on both FB and Twitter (though I guess that latter half still needs Twitter API support for person-tagging people in Twitter photo posts)
# 03:02 [snarfed] yup. which will likely never exist, based on taking with people there
# 03:02 kylewm @snarfed: up for reviewing some pull requests? O:)
# 03:03 kylewm snarfed++ github contributions in the last year 1,337 total
# 03:03 tantek snarfed I remain optimistic about peer-pressuring Twitter into better API support, especially if we get silo SWAT0 working with FB
# 03:03 tantek snarfed lol would love to respond to that over drinks
# 03:04 [snarfed] tantek: love your optimism, but from talking to actual decision makers there, it's unlikely, just FYI
# 03:04 tantek hah - actual decision makers at Twitter have a short half-life these days
# 03:05 kylewm all you have to do is convince them that API improvements will grow their user base
hober joined the channel
# 03:05 tantek turnover is a good thing - it means you every once in a while you get another chance to ask anew
# 03:08 kylewm (I was hoping I'd get it done before you finished facebook person tagging ;P)
# 03:10 kylewm well, I was counting on unexpected Facebook nonsense
nitot joined the channel
tantek and [snarfed] joined the channel
# 03:44 [snarfed] (the app is great, except you can't leave inline comments on commits :/ )
davidized and snarfed joined the channel
# 04:16 tantek I think I'm going to end up staying up late hacking again on photo posts and in particular person-tagging
KartikPrabhu, mdik, nitot and snarfed joined the channel
nitot joined the channel
# 05:45 kylewm is there a distinction b/t "photo with a title and caption" vs. "photo with a title" in implied post-type stuff?
snarfed joined the channel
# 05:46 kylewm in particular, how should one map a 'photo' post to Flickr which has title and description
# 05:49 tantek modern photo posting practices have dropped the title & caption distinction
# 05:49 tantek so the question is what to do about the legacy
# 05:50 tantek checks the Flickr mobile app to see what it does
# 05:52 kylewm (in general, i'm glad they did, i always found titling photos on Flickr laborious)
# 05:52 tantek kylewm indeed - not sure if you ever saw my photos on Flickr which all had the default title of whatever filename my camera gave the photos
# 05:53 tantek btw no need to use implied post-type for this
# 05:53 tantek once you determine that something is a photo post
# 05:53 tantek you can use your usual logic for whether the name is actually relevant compared to the content
# 05:54 tantek and if it is, use name for the Flickr title. Either way use content for the Flickr description.
# 05:55 kylewm i was using the content as the title (when there is no explicit title)
# 05:55 tantek ugh no - Flickr titles are super inconvenient / ugly
# 05:55 tantek well you also said "always found titling photos on Flickr laborious"
# 05:58 tantek i'm really going to screw this up when I POSSE to Flickr then
# 05:59 kylewm yeah you do longer captions on photos; those would not make for good titles
# 05:59 tantek I don't really do captions - more like descriptions
# 05:59 tantek e.g. on my IG - my descriptions are often posts in and of themselves - like paragraphs
# 06:02 kylewm this is really a challenge with bridgy publish; picking one way that works for >2 different people
# 06:03 kylewm for shorter content, use it as the title, for longer content, use a truncated version as the title and include the full content in the body?
# 06:04 kylewm although I know how hard it was to get Loqi to recognize "a sentence"
# 06:05 tantek I've long considered doing that for Twitter POSSEing
# 06:05 tantek and including a permashortlink for any note longer than a sentence
# 06:06 kylewm how do you feel about (<a href="...">Original</a>) for the permalink?
# 06:17 tantek how about just re-use Bridgy's existing (Originally posted: ... ) ?
# 06:18 kylewm since Flickr lets you embed limited HTML, I was thinking it'd be nicer to use a shorter tag
# 06:20 tantek I think the lengthier URL with likely recognizable domain name and bigger hit-target is nicer from a promote-the-original perspective.
# 06:22 tantek also the more consistent Bridgy behavior across silos feels more familiar / friendlier
# 06:22 kylewm and that's what adactio and Known both appear to be doing
# 06:22 kylewm Known -- Originally posted at URL, adactio -- just the URL
# 06:23 kylewm ohh, ok what about flickr comments? same thing?
# 06:23 tantek you going to add support for POSSEing replies to Flickr photos to Flickr as comments?!?
# 06:28 tantek since Flickr does distinguish between the two
michel_v and nitot joined the channel
# 06:32 tantek Filckr may be the first (only?) silo that has a concept (API?) of tagging someone else's posts
# 06:32 tantek you may need to be "friends" with benwerd to do that
# 06:32 tantek whereas you can word/phrase tag *anyone's* photo by default (unless they have locked it down)
KartikPrabhu1, nitot, wolftune, uranther_, sensiblemn_, aaronpk_, TheBigRedButton, dgw, _6a68, strugee, minsky, friedcell, cweiske, acegiak, sanduhrs, elima_ and Jihaisse joined the channel
j12t, friedcell, eschnou, loic_m, mlncn, hober, nitot, tvn, petermolnar, lewisnyman, glennjones, benborges, tantek, interactivist, adactio and elf-pavlik joined the channel
eschnou, johnstorey, friedcell, elima_ and fkooman joined the channel
j12t, ttepasse, tvn_ and nitot_ joined the channel
# 13:18 voxpelli Do anyone know any Heroku (or Surge.sh) like HTTP2-enabled services or any other way to easily add HTTP2 Push to ones site without having to manage the servers oneself?
j12t, friedcell, interactivist, mlncn, loic_m, ramsey, arlen, tantek and mattl joined the channel
# 13:59 tantek petermolnar: ^^^ I doubt anyone is POSSEing - perhaps create stubs for those?
hs0ucy and squeakytoy2 joined the channel
# 14:27 GWG I have been experimenting with Google Photos as a backup
# 14:27 tantek GWG - that's worth creating a small stub page for and stating that
# 14:28 GWG I just started. I am moving to a four pronged backup
j12t and [snarfed] joined the channel
# 14:35 GWG I wonder if having your content on several silos plus a local copy is the best backup strategy
# 14:36 Loqi LOCKSS is an acronym for Lots Of Copies Keeps Stuff Safe, a mnemonic for the technique of keeping and encouraging many copies of things as a way of improving their longevity https://indiewebcamp.com/LOCKSS
# 14:42 Jeena do we have some information on what to do to get more people to come to the local HWCs?
# 14:47 tantek Jeena - perhaps check the /HWC page? If nothing there create a section on it!
# 14:47 tantek personally inviting interested individuals to every meetup
# 14:48 tantek posting an indie event and POSSE copies on various silos that your communities use (FB, Lanyrd, Eventbrite, etc.)
# 14:49 Jeena I'm a really bad salesman because I always feel that advertising is always like intruding peoples space and if I do it every other week they all will hate me for it
# 14:50 tantek Jeena - in reality if it is invitations to events, the feedback I have gotten is the people really *like* being invited
# 14:50 Jeena hm but speaking on other meetups about it would be cool I guess
# 14:50 tantek it is the opposite of intrusion, but rather they feel *included*
# 14:50 tantek socially, people want to feel invited and welcome to events
# 14:51 tantek otherwise a lot of people by default feel they are not "the right people" or "welcome" or etc. at even "open" events
# 14:51 tantek this is especially true for demographics beyond typical attendees
# 14:51 tantek that kind of explicit outreach is particularly effective when you do so *personally*
# 14:51 tantek e.g. in addition to adding people to a FB event etc.
# 14:51 Jeena hm so inviting every person for them selves, not just dumping in a IRC channel I guess?
# 14:51 tantek reaching out to people you've met in your broader communities over messaging systems
# 14:52 tantek Jeena - *yes* - inviting people for themselves
# 14:52 tantek it is a bit more work, however it is much more effective, and even if people don't come, you leave them feeling better by feeling included, and they may come after a few invitations
# 14:53 tantek so even if they don't respond or decline, keep inviting them personally! hopefully you will at least have a chat with them.
# 14:57 bear I find that it can take 2 or 3 invites before someone has your event in their minds enough to make room for it in the schedule they keep
snarfed and singpolyma joined the channel
jonnybarnes and j12t joined the channel
# 15:32 tantek snarfed: nice link! yes that's very cool that we have a standards based way of providing the Add to Home Screen prompt
# 15:36 tantek it's definitely very cool - yet I definitely still want the "show add to home screen prompt immediately" feature for the /contact use-case
# 15:39 tantek kylewm: speaking of "original post" links in POSSE copies
# 15:40 adactio tantek: I do the same from the Clearleft blog, and I put rel="canonical" on the "on my own site" link.
# 15:41 tantek adactio: I like the rel=canonical usage - makes sense
# 15:41 tantek adactio, while you're hrere, do you have a citable reference for the LOCKSS principle? Seems to be 15+ years old and web search engines tend to be bad at things that far in the past
elf-pavlik joined the channel
# 15:41 Loqi tantek meant to say: adactio, while you're here, do you have a citable reference for the LOCKSS principle? Seems to be 15+ years old and web search engines tend to be bad at things that far in the past
# 15:42 adactio tantek: I don't have a good LOCKSS reference offhand. Lemmee see if I can find something...
# 15:42 tantek adactio: one would think there would be lots of copies of the description LOCKSS Principle
# 15:43 tantek though the project now dominates web search results, thus occluding history
wolftune joined the channel
# 15:50 acegiak GWG: how do I turn off the automatic populating thing in post kinds? I don't want there to be a citation content for this post but it keeps repopulating it :/
# 15:55 tantek An original post link is a hyperlink from a [[POSSE ]] copy to its original indieweb post.
snarfed, tvn and __number5__ joined the channel
mlncn, lewisnyman and j12t joined the channel
# 16:14 tantek kylewm: ^^^ based on your questions last night about how to compose the text/link re: "originally posted on" etc. started a page about the feature with examples - please add more!
j12t_ joined the channel
# 16:17 tantek specifically about that one feature of POSSE copies
# 16:17 Loqi aaronpk meant to say: huh I thought I had some things on the wiki already
sanduhrs joined the channel
# 16:19 tantek.com edited /POSSE (+10) "/* Why */ no need to pick on two pieces of software which are shifting to try to federate with other solutions" (
view diff )
# 16:19 aaronpk oh and it looks like my "see original" links are gone
# 16:20 tantek whoa - that's worth re-screenshotting and documenting
# 16:26 tantek adactio: ^^^ want to stub since you just blogged it?
funwhilelost and shiflett joined the channel
# 16:45 Loqi Ok, I'll tell them that when I see them next
# 16:46 aaronpk this seems to happen more and more... i'm considering adding a threshold where Loqi silently deletes the !tell if the person replies within x seconds of it being created
# 16:46 tantek heh - I thought you were going to say something about last minute PDX HWC venues "this seems to happen more and more..." ;)
# 16:54 tantek great that we're doing 6 HWC again this week!
# 16:54 tantek hey rhiaro - any chance you might be able to create a last minute HWC MIT with Sandro?
# 16:55 tantek it would be a good week to start (2 year anniversary!)
[snarfed] joined the channel
# 17:11 [snarfed] anniversary! tantek are you still planning on getting a cake?
# 17:11 tantek working on seeing if I can get some more food than that
cleverdevil and tantek joined the channel
# 17:24 aaronpk seems to actually be a lot about the style of communication Slack and IRC provides, text-based communication and communication in small groups
snarfed and tvn joined the channel
indie-visitor joined the channel
# 17:36 Loqi Welcome, indie-visitor! Set your nickname by typing /nick yourname
[erikstl] joined the channel
# 17:39 [erikstl] I used to live in IRC, though I don't think my residence there was as productive as yours.
# 17:43 [erikstl] Once I started working for a place that blocked IRC ports, I realized my ability to stay here long-term was going to be seriously hampered.
M-RyanRix, M-Kodo and M-kegan joined the channel
# 17:45 Jeena [erikstl], we're fighting a client (we have to work at their office) to give us uncomplicated open internet
# 17:46 Jeena everyone there uses a http_proxy but we're using our own phones all day until they give us a open network
# 17:46 Jeena petermolnar, as I am saying at work all the time, that is a technical sollution for a social problem, which is the company treats you like a child.
funwhilelost joined the channel
# 17:54 [erikstl] fortunately, Slack has given me the temporary workaround, at least for this channel.
snarfed and [snarfed] joined the channel
# 18:02 [snarfed] slack++ yup. outside of work, these days I'm mostly here on slack on the phone
# 18:03 kylewm I'm trying out Glowing Bear connected to weechat and it's pretty darn nice, although I'm not sure if it's doing the communications with weechat on the client side or server side
# 18:06 aaronpk kylewm: i think glowing-bear.org is just an HTML/js client
# 18:08 aaronpk yeah "you can just use our hosted version powered by GitHub pages... Your browser connects to WeeChat directly, so it does not matter where Glowing Bear is hosted."
Garbee and elima_ joined the channel
# 18:10 snarfed (i think the fb notif failed due to a bug that's since been fixed)
# 18:11 aaronpk oh weird. i got the bridgy notification a couple days ago
# 18:12 snarfed also, humblebrag, i <3 the new "Polling now" message
# 18:13 snarfed hopefully makes people a little more patient while it's polling
# 18:14 snarfed good reminder that UX is largely about little polish details, not big hard technical challenges
gRegorLove, tvn_, mlncn and lewisnyman_ joined the channel
# 18:42 aaronpk it messes with my spatial memory of the IRC channels since everything is sorted alphabetically.
# 18:43 bear for selfish reasons I hope that is like the most horrible UX possible and everyone stops highlighting "bear"
# 18:44 bear "grin and bear it" "bear with me" ...
scor joined the channel
# 18:47 bear yes, because I have a regex for <whitespace>bear<whitespace>
# 18:48 bear during working hours I turn off audible notifications from my irc client - so it's not all that of a bother
# 18:49 aaronpk wow yeah this is really interesting, it's totally disorienting compared to my terminal client.
# 18:52 kylewm I haven't learned the keyboard shortcuts on glowing be/ar yet, not sure if there are any
# 18:53 aaronpk kylewm: I didn't know you were running weechat, that's cool
lewisnyman joined the channel
# 18:53 aaronpk I still use both haha. weechat connected to a ZNC.
# 18:54 aaronpk so now i'm actually connected from browser -> weechat -> ZNC -> IRC
# 18:54 aaronpk which means if you're reading this in Slack, it's going from my browser -> weechat -> ZNC -> IRC -> HTTP -> Slack server -> Slack client
# 18:54 kylewm when you reaaally don't want to get disconnected
# 18:55 kylewm i wonder how many conversions there are from XML to JSON and back in that stack
snarfed and cleverdevil- joined the channel
# 19:01 aaronpk i think only slack server -> slack client is JSON
eschnou joined the channel
# 19:04 aaronpk this is also a good demonstration of how hard it is to get a chat UI right. slack is way better, and weechat console is better.
tantek, nitot, funwhilelost, tvn, snarfed, mlncn, awolf, hs0ucy1, mattronix, z1 and Gold joined the channel
# 20:14 GWG !tell acegiak Currently not possible, but I should add that
# 20:14 Loqi Ok, I'll tell them that when I see them next
cleverdevil, funwhilelost, nitot, snarfed, shiflett and [zero-gravitas] joined the channel
shiflett joined the channel
# 21:33 ben_thatmustbeme it actually makes a good case for not doing "like" but rather having any generic "reaction"
# 21:34 aaronpk we don't even need any new properties or anything. if the content of a reply is a single emoji character, don't display it as a comment, but instead, group it with other single-char replies and show the count of them on the post
nitot joined the channel
# 21:37 singpolyma do we also allow reply-to and an A ? or whitelist characters?
# 21:39 aaronpk easy way to do polls, A, B or C? then people can reply with the letter
lewisnyman joined the channel
# 21:45 aaronpk i could even see adding some multi-char whitelisted values like "+1"
minsky and Garbee joined the channel
# 21:50 kylewm also love the idea of "first" being a counter instead of the first comment
# 21:51 kylewm asking people not to +1 issues is a social solution to a technical problem :)
lewisnyman joined the channel
# 21:57 tantek my goal for HWC is to get person-tags working on my photo posts, and with any luck, getting POSSEd to FB too
# 21:57 tantek anyone else want to throw down a goal for our anniversary HWC this week?
# 21:57 aaronpk i've been cranking away at my new site, but i'm kind of tempted to launch reacji on my current site
# 21:57 tantek I'm pretty sure benwerd has some cool new stuff to show
# 21:58 tantek And I'd like to show cross-site person-tagging working
# 21:58 snarfed (SF IWC on 12/3 is also available for demos that need more time to bake :P)
# 21:59 aaronpk best part is nobody else needs to add anything to support sending reacji to people that can receive them
# 22:00 kylewm tantek: I'm planning to add person-tagging for Bridgy Publish to Flickr; synergy!
indie-visitor, nitot, j12t_, Zegnat, mlncn_, snarfed, kylewm, rektide, catsup, danlyke, squeakytoy, renoirb_, petermolnar_, M-Kodo, elf-pavlik_, martinBrown_, shiflett, edsu, elima_, Erkan_Yilmaz and funwhilelost joined the channel
catsup joined the channel
catsup and ttepasse joined the channel