2015-12-16 UTC
minsky, KevinMarks_, kousu[xmpp], snarfed and M-RyanRix joined the channel
# 01:00 KevinMarks hm, kyle's collection post type looks like my noterlive output, as they are a list of cites
bengo and lukebrooker joined the channel
# 01:13 KevinMarks the other examples don't have the collected items as children
# 01:13 GWG If you could spend all day writing Indieweb stuff, would you?
# 01:14 GWG I always feel like I am not scratching my itches fast enough
# 01:18 GWG KevinMarks, going to do an end of year post? Or end of year goal?
# 01:19 KevinMarks my sons are home for the holidays so likely going to be focusing on them instead of my site
# 01:21 GWG Nothing brings a family together around the holidays like site updates
# 01:21 GWG I have December 25 off this year for the first time in several. Maybe I will spend it hacking.
# 01:24 GWG Usually I just use the day to celebrate the Eggnog Riots of 1826,but hacking seems much more productive
wagle and lukebrooker joined the channel
KartikPrabhu joined the channel
Jihaisse and wagle joined the channel
tantek, gRegorLove, snarfed, bengo and lukebrooker joined the channel
tantek, KartikPrabhu1, anm, cweiske, Jihaisse, loic_m__, KartikPrabhu, loic_m_, j12t, elima, shiflett and sanduhrs joined the channel
# 09:37 Loqi Loqi goes offline soon while some more Linode servers reboot
# 09:37 Loqi Countdown set by aaronpk on 12/14/15 at 8:37am
ttepasse, elima, loic_m, squeakytoy2, glennjones and adactio joined the channel
# 10:34 calumryan.com created /Template:calumryan (+254) "Created page with "<span class="h-card" style="white-space:nowrap"><img src="https://calumryan.com/images/profile.jpg" class="u-photo" style="height:1.2em;vertical-align:bottom" alt="Calum Ryan"><a..."" (
view diff )
# 10:46 calumryan.com created /User:Calumryan.com (+402) "Created page with "<span style="float:right;margin-left:1em"><img src="https://calumryan.com/images/profile.jpg" style="width:128px"></span> = <a class="h-card" href="https://calumryan.com">Calum ..."" (
view diff )
sanduhrs joined the channel
Pierre-O joined the channel
loic_m and loic_m_ joined the channel
# 11:18 ben_thatmustbeme anyone feel like helping me test some reacji? I need more reacjis to start working on display
loic_m__ joined the channel
loic_m__ joined the channel
# 11:40 petermolnar ben_thatmustbeme damn, my response has the in reply to url in the content
# 11:53 petermolnar ben_thatmustbeme is the single emoji is wrapped around with html (eg. <p>), is that an issue?
Tino__ joined the channel
jkphl, fkooman, Pierre-O, loic_m__, ttepasse, loic_m_, mapkyca, mapkyca_, hs0ucy, mxuribe, tantek, tvn, tvn_, danlyke_, yakker, aaronpk, mlncn, jedahan and uranther joined the channel
# 16:18 ben_thatmustbeme i'm going to try and copy the UI from slack to start, but it means getting a hover over each to show icons of who sent them
bengo, tantek, shiflett and j12t joined the channel
Pierre-O and loic_m joined the channel
adactio, KartikPrabhu and [snarfed] joined the channel
wolftune, loic_m_, bengo, j12t, endi, adactio, loic_m__, Pierre-O, singpolyma and calumryan joined the channel
# 18:29 aaronpk afaik on twitter you can only leave out the @-mention for replies to yourself. other ppls' replies require they mention the name of the person they're replying to
# 18:32 aaronpk you wouldn't be able to tell why something was appearing in the thread
# 18:33 ben_thatmustbeme its stranger then that the UI lets you remove the mention in a reply box and have it appear as a regular tweet
# 18:34 Loqi ben_thatmustbeme meant to say: its stranger that the UI lets you remove the mention in a reply box and have it appear as a regular tweet
wavis joined the channel
# 18:47 aaronpk I don't think so, because the @-mention can be re-arranged within the text. mayyyybe makes sense to remove it if it's the first thing in the text, but i'm not convinced
# 18:53 ben_thatmustbeme i feel like there is no good place to remove it, I don't really want to have code on my end for something that might be a reply from a specific silo (and might not be)
# 18:54 ben_thatmustbeme to me it makes the most sense there, since its really a matter of masking twitter awkwardness, but yes you would likely only want to do it if its the first thing in the tweet
Pierre-O joined the channel
# 18:55 aaronpk I guess I don't really consider it "twitter awkwardness". that's just how people talk on twitter
# 18:56 ben_thatmustbeme its not "just how people talk on twitter" its "how people talk on twitter because they don't have a choice"
j12t, j12t_, singpolyma, Lancey and tvn_ joined the channel
wagle, loic_m_, loic_m__, Pierre-O, kousu_xmpp, danlyke_, koray and tantek joined the channel
shiflett, koray and kousu_xmpp joined the channel
# 21:36 ben_thatmustbeme i suppose i should still keep something around to display like count should anyone want that from it
# 21:37 tantek Slack displays count for each - is that what you mean?
# 21:38 tantek hey there mr emoji - I somehow forgot to copy the emoji from my IG caption to my own post so they didn't go through to the POSSE copies of my photo this morning.
# 21:45 tantek ben_thatmustbeme: I have questions, like how does one markup an emoji? is it just a reply with one emoji character? is it a like that also has content of one emoji character?
# 21:46 aaronpk I didn't make any changes to post my reacji there
# 21:50 tantek took an educated guess from memory of discussions.
# 21:51 aaronpk does it make sense for me to add reacji handling in webmention.io? or would that be handled by the site using webmention.io?
# 21:54 tantek I'd think you'd want people to @-reply you with a single emoji character and have it work!
# 21:55 aaronpk but you can't reply to a tweet with only an emoji because you need to include their username
# 21:56 tantek I think it's ok to explicitly drop the @-reply from a reacjweet
# 21:56 tantek trivial compared to the work you already did!
Pierre-O joined the channel
# 22:02 tantek I feel like we should allow a like with p-content of a single emoji to also work for this
# 22:03 tantek so you can use likes as fallback for receivers that don't (yet) support reacji
# 22:03 tantek well if we take like to now universally mean a single heart reacji then it follows
# 22:03 tantek aaronpk true - so this is only for like-like emoji ;)
# 22:04 tantek it's ok that we optimize for likes, biasing our design for positive reactions as it were ;)
# 22:04 ben_thatmustbeme so i'm following slack's thinking on this one, a like is a heart / thumbs up / star / whatever you want, but a reacji is not a like
# 22:04 tantek wait huh? how does slack differentiate? I haven't noticed that
# 22:04 ben_thatmustbeme reacji are far more expressive and we don't need to attach any specific meaning for them
# 22:05 aaronpk +1 for not attaching extra meaning by naming things
# 22:05 aaronpk I don't want to "like with a birthday cake", I just want to send a birthday cake
# 22:05 tantek alright so for reacji + like backcompat I'd have to combine them
# 22:05 tantek "u-like-of u-in-reply-to" and then a p-content. hmmm
# 22:09 ben_thatmustbeme i definitely think the reply with single emoji is much better, fits with how people use it on Github, facebook, etc
# 22:10 aaronpk yeah i can't really find a reason why special markup would be helpful
# 22:10 ben_thatmustbeme oh, and about twitter backfeed, its actually easier than that regex, because i only care if it start with MY handle
# 22:12 tantek ah - my code is adding fallback content of "likes " to the emoji
# 22:12 tantek reacji feel like fancy likes to me, so I think that's how I'm going to post them
lukebrooker joined the channel
# 22:14 aaronpk having spent time in several slack channels dedicated to specific "topic"s like "#bad-attitude" where people post sometimes quite awful things and are looking for sympathy or just need to vent, reacji definitely don't feel like fancy likes to me
snarfed joined the channel
# 22:16 tantek because on my end the content was more than an emoji
# 22:17 tantek though a reacji is a stronger / richer reaction, thus it should take precedence
# 22:18 tantek hah - I'm hacking a post type that my system doesn't even support yet
# 22:18 aaronpk i posted a birthday cake response without having to change anything
# 22:19 aaronpk i think actually not combining them is more representative of what's happening
# 22:19 tantek so I can reacji anything and at least have the recipient get the "like" meaning even if they don't interpret the reacji
# 22:20 aaronpk well that will require that the recipient prioritizes the content of an in-reply-to over the like-of property. from what i've gathered, implementations differ on what takes precedence
# 22:20 tantek ah I think I figured it out. the "likes " text should only go in p-summary for those that don't even interpret likes
# 22:21 tantek do they? I mean which implementations do what?
# 22:21 aaronpk this came up recently, can't remember where exactly
# 22:22 aaronpk we were comparing webmention implementations, some people have a bunch of if/then blocks that check for specific properties, but not everyone does it in the same order
# 22:24 tantek that's why I'm documenting post-type-discovery
# 22:24 tantek would appreciate any info on divergences and reasoning if any
singpolyma, snarfed and fkooman joined the channel
singpolyma joined the channel
# 22:39 tantek one consideration for me is that I have no desire to POSSE reacji
# 22:40 tantek because on Twitter they're kind of like noise, and frankly no one parses out the @-reply anyway so they don't work
shiflett joined the channel
# 22:44 tantek hey ben_thatmustbeme what no webmention form on your permalinks? ;)
# 22:45 tantek ben_thatmustbeme: do you support webmention updates?
glennjones and Pierre-O1 joined the channel
# 22:57 tantek ben_thatmustbeme: see also how I'm "summarizing" my reacji to your post - in a way that I can post it in-stream and hopefully have it make sense out of context
# 22:58 tantek is just happy he didn't break all his "like" presentation, including clustering with all the code that just got hacked to make this work.
lukebrooker joined the channel
modem joined the channel
kerozene, lukebroo_ and ben_thatmustbeme joined the channel