#tantek.comedited /indieweb.org (+491) "note that this page and the proposals therein were all done after discussions & consensus at the IndieWeb Summit and the subsequent strong +1ing of that consensus by the community" (view diff)
#aaronpkEileenK: that's done with microformats2, by putting an h-card on your home page
#EileenKAlso, I've buit a couple of pages from scratch recently and realized, I have no idea what a modern (2016) home page should look like. Zero... I know the ones we used to build that I used to complain about and improve.
#tantekEileenK: re: "no idea what a modern (2016) home page should look like." we have some ideas, but could use more! indiewebcamp.com/homepage
#EileenKWell I miss the silver age of the early aughts. Even if the pages were badly laid out (too much dead space and too much center aligning and unnecessary nesting of tables) they were still rich and pretty.
#tantekEileenK: do you mean like the "about.me" look?
#EileenKI mean like what people used to make with web sets.
#aaronparecki.comedited /rename_to_IndieWeb (-132) "/* Details */ there is no "default" assumption to be made about web interface URLs since the current URL does not include the channel name" (view diff)
#gRegorLoveI guess i see a lot of overlap between the two, though maybe for those outside the community they'd be interested in just IndieNews sans all our wiki stuff.
#aaronpkinteresting. i see them as totally different things.
#gRegorLoveNot suggesting the presentation of IndieNews change in any major way, though.
#gRegorLoveaaonpk: "I feel like things like indieweb.org/chat/dev/2016-06-22 are a bit too long. IMO chat.indieweb.org/dev/2016-06-22 looks better." those two are the same length. Typo?
#aaronpkwould appreciate everyone else (especially those who already voted on this page) to chime in on these issues. we need to make a decision on this sooner rather than later in order to do the switch on July 4th! https://indiewebcamp.com/rename_to_IndieWeb
#Loqi[David Shanske] Converting WordPress Themes for Microformats 2 – Part 1
snarfed joined the channel
#colintedfordI think subdomains are more clunky/confusing to "regular folks" (well, those who pay any attention to urls). It's like a sentence going in 2 directions at once. Muddles the hierarchy.
#LoqiSlack is a closed-source team communication tool similar to IRC but with expanding support for various types of content such as emoji polls, inline images, and attachments https://indiewebcamp.com/Slack
#KevinMarks_Ruxton: the slack is a mirror of the irc
#kylewmand it infuriates me that federation still works just enough so you can see people on other networks, but when you try to talk to them it fails invisibly
#LoqiHubzilla (formerly RedMatrix) is an open source, federated, community web server that started as a fork of Friendica https://indiewebcamp.com/HubZilla
#ben_thatmustbemeyou can always record those concerns on the wiki entry
#Vipul1My only issue was, unwillingness to commit to it's tooling (time constraints and all..) meant accepting the rigidness of an out-of-the-box solution, eventually it gets to you.
#Vipul1Otherwise, it's very comprehensive, with very active development to meet any shortcomings.
#ben.thatmustbe.meedited /HubZilla (+28) "/* Current Issues and Criticisms */ it has its own methods for verifying comments to prevent forgery" (view diff)
#Vipul1& it's developers are fairly attentive towards indieweb movement as well.
#ben_thatmustbemeindeed. My PRs got accepted quite quickly, rather pleased with that
#Vipul1HubZilla is more Friendica continued with rebranding emphasizing shift of objective than fork as just another alternative development effort, but I was unable to search & find the exact explanation post for the wiki
#ben_thatmustbemewell the code-bases have changed enough that they are not the same software anymore, and they have seperate dev communities, so thats still a fork, even if creator is the one who did it
#Vipul1i. e. the contributors seem to be the same mostly
#ben_thatmustbemelooking at the recent commits and PRs I don't really see any overlap really
#Vipul1After spending abit more time updating my site, I'll put it in current issues & criticisms to be fair contrasting the 2
#Vipul1yea, I had an older release, guess now the devs are better aligned with the respective projects focus.
#Vipul1talking about Hubzilla is a moving target..
KartikPrabhu joined the channel
#Vipul1Before deciding to give Hubzilla a go, I looked up conversations around it, rather than PRs though.. so my impression might be somewhat off..
#LoqiPierre-O: tantek left you a message on 6/1 at 10:55am: re: holacracy. Nope. Not a *community*, nor any actual evidence of *success* (more self-asserted marketing claims). That is however a typical example of the current fashion of sexy product site with big blocks of different color background you scroll through to approximate pages. http://indiewebcamp.com/irc/2016-06-01/line/1464803706264
#snarfedaaronpk: just fyi i started a wm implemention report for bridgy, but it's awkward to make it talk to wm.rocks, for obvious reasons, and that looks like most of the content...so...not sure
#aaronpkwould still love an impl report from bridgy, since it's important to know the details of which parts of the spec it implements in order to progress to the next step in w3c
#ben_thatmustbemeprobably best for me to blacklist webmention.rocks as a valid vouch domain at some point though
friedcell and [chrisaldrich] joined the channel
#[chrisaldrich]GWG: I can spin up a few WordPress test sites if you need them. Anything in particular you were trying to test from your comment earlier this morning?
#GWGchrisaldrich, this WordPress timezone thing. gregorlove found the test he did had a plugin changing the default.
#[chrisaldrich]GWG: Kudos on the post this morning. I'm sending you a reply in a moment or two, in part as a devil's advocate for Gen2 and Gen3 indieweb users. (I know most/all of the answers, but thought there might be some use in the Socratic method.) Some of it you may have covered in your Part 2 post, I just haven't seen it yet.
#[chrisaldrich]I've been noticing that there are much better methods for doing timestamps than some of the ones I've been using by default, it's definitely on my roadmap, so there's no reason to bump it up a bit.
#[chrisaldrich]I'd looked at your _s stuff a bit over the weekend and it seems solid. Shall I pile onto that PR to push the issue for development?
#[chrisaldrich]I've noticed some sporadic timezone issues recently, but haven't had time/desire to dig in and fix them (other than by hand if they seem critical).
#GWGchrisaldrich, it is also stage 1. I have to come up with a neater way to do tags
#[chrisaldrich]I've had tags on my todo list for a bit, but they haven't seemed as important for some reason. Is there something particular (besides completeness?) driving your itch?
#[chrisaldrich]Sorry, lost my mind for a second... I was thinking about two other themes I've been pecking away at and had lost sight that this was specifically for _s!
#[chrisaldrich]having more themes support small pieces of indieweb like this will go a huge way towards helping adoption, particularly for Gen2/3
#[chrisaldrich]Yes, it's a great way to "infect" underlying code so that it's supported out of the box. The key is to keep people from using the mf stuff for themeing when they're not sure what it's really for...
shiflett, KartikPrabhu, snarfed, friedcell, callovarne, M-RyanRix, jdp, terminalpixel, Eloquence, myfreeweb, danielcberman, PFMurph, halorgium, comzeradd, _6a68, emceeaich_, kegan[m], renoirb, hmans, lmorchard, CaptainCalliope, michel_v, reidab and jkphl joined the channel
#tantekGWG, I noticed you were using a US formatted date inside a time element. If you want to use that style of display, you must use a datetime attr for dt-published
#tanteke.g. making the home page and other wiki things work for us to make the switch we did for IndieWeb Summit
#tantekshaners, I'm not sure asking "who" is that helpful, instead saying, "I can help with", which is how I signed up for and did the home page changes
#[shaners]For example, who is able to actually do a mediawiki upgrade? Even if other people had those keys to the castle, who is willing to?
#tantekso if there's a piece of infrastructure that you feel confident and motivated to help with, go ahead and say so
#gRegorLoveI am willing to do MediaWiki maintenance. I don't have direct experience, but am comfortable setting up a test version of MediaWiki and learning, and PHP is my daily programming language.
#[shaners]I think it’s helpful. Bc part of what shaped my part of the proposal was my ability to help build and maintain some of those pieces. But as it stands, I’m not able to do anything about mediawiki or its plugins.
#bear[shaners] i've asked multiple times across the last couple of months to help with the backend infra load
#[shaners]tantek: that’s not been true so far. news.iwc.com, this-week, those were built and deployed on iwc.com proper
#tantekshaners, nope, those were all experimental *additions*, not *transitions*. very different
#tantekand as aaronpk has pointed out, he's not sure news.iwc was even appropriate, and is thinking of moving it to one of his own domains
#[shaners]also, the web logs of /irc and the live chat of /irc were not built and deployed on someone else’s site. they were built expressly for iwc.com and deployed there.
#[shaners]i’m also not even talking about building a cms. we proposed using jekyll. nothing to build. but i can help maintain that in a way that I can’t with mediawiki / php.
#tantekwhich helps because then you can pretty much eliminate all "product/project management" type coordination stuffs
#tantekjekyll is less accessible than mediawiki to a broad set of people
#tantekand it was proposed as a *replacement*, not an addition
#[kylewm]please let’s not debate jekyll vs. mediawiki again
#tantekI feel like I've seen too many companies/projects go nuts with installing too many things, using too many languages and then you have a big mess that not only no one person can maintain, but each piece has a bus factor of one, which makes it *superfragile* - since the chance of any 1 of n people failing is much greater (exponentially) than just 1 person failing.
#bearthe reason I tend to avoid having any community ramp up on core/feature infra is to avoid having the care-and-feeding of that infra turn into another unpaid job for the people who started it (no matter what the level of enthusiasm was)
#bearthis policy also allows you to politely suggest "no" to folks without seeming like it's a no from someone "in the core"
#bearwhispers to aaronpk ... go back to sleep quick!
#aaronpkJust want to toss another data point in for consideration. I did a lot of work to make indiewebify.me run on google app engine and auto deploy from github in order to allow more people to contribute to it without going through me, however that has yet to be taken advantage of
#aaronpkNot sure I have a particular point I'm trying to make, just worth remembering that while having this discussion
#gRegorLoveI might take a try at it. 26 open issues currently.
snarfed and shiflett joined the channel
#aaronpkThanks. It definitely needs a few holes patched
#aaronpkalso, putting aside the whole discussion of the new things on /indieweb.org, we do need to settle on everything on the "rename to IndieWeb" page pretty soon in order to actually switch on July 4
#[kylewm]aaronpk: does anything need to be decided other than docs. or no docs.?
#aaronpkis there a pattern to them? Max like length or something?
#[kylewm]missed the lines before and after you said “Since the current logs…" ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
AndChat|566325 joined the channel
#[kylewm]no I just mean, you can just redirect indiewebcamp.com/ to indieweb.org/ on July 4 … none of the other stuff has to happen on that day does it?
#colintedfordRegardless of whether it gets logged, if the chat urls change to have "chat" in them we want to rename #indiechat / #indieweb-chat to avoid confusion.
#gRegorLoveso far move to gazette.p3k.io is winning. I feel bad voting and piling up more work for aaronpk :)
#gRegorLoveBut I think I'm liking it more than the other options
#gRegorLoveThough "leave it as-is, move it to gazette later" is an option
#aaronpkthis chat thing is turning into like 3 different issues and i'm worried the page doesn't capture them separately right now
#beareither way, we have to get multiple channels solved
#bearand where those UI items and log links live is the other set of issues (accurate?)
#aaronpk1) IRC room names, pretty much already agreed upon 2) base URL for the web interface, e.g. subdomain vs path, and 3) URL structure for web interface
#gRegorLove"Redirect news.indiewebcamp.com to news.indieweb.org" and "leave it at news.indiewebcamp.com"
snarfed1 joined the channel
#aaronpkif we bump up the header level the subheaders will stand out better. that kept confusing me while i was editing the page
#gRegorLoveI thought it was a given that anything "indiewebcamp.com" is being redirected. Am I mis-reading the second one?
#gRegorLoveIn my head I was reading the second as "leave it at news.indieweb.org" which is the same option. That's where I'm getting confused.
#tantek.comedited /rename_to_IndieWeb (+628) "/* where to put IRC logs */ add votes, change a few votes per reasoning from others, simplify chat options based on non-controversial opinion patterns" (view diff)
shiflett joined the channel
#bearaaronpk - did I make sense with my little ascii diagram about why I don't like/recommend that proxy_pass goes to any external entity (well any that isn't behind the same firewall as the nginx itself)?
#KevinMarks_at the moment chat and wiki have separate logins (and login model) which may be an argument for isolation fo cookies
#bearwell, you don't *lose* it - you just now have all traffic going across the internet with the same cert - and the web client would not know if the backend connection was MITM'd
#aaronpkKevinMarks_: i was considering combining them
#tantek.comedited /rename_to_IndieWeb (+266) "/* where to put bookmark aggregator */ changed votes based on others' reasoning, new fave option gazette" (view diff)
#aaronpkcan you move the URL design part of that out? that shouldn't have been part of the question
#tantekshaners "The wiki is too intimidating to drop new people into" is not going to magically solve itself with a second set of pages. if anything that will only make it worse because the same people not improving the wiki will also not improve a second set of pages
#KevinMarks_I suppose edting the wiki from chat already means that they have implictly the same login, but we do lose the 'join the club' aspect of setting up indieauth wiht a specific goal
#bearafter a while I was getting confused so I just voted where I saw others
#tantekonly way to solve "The wiki is too intimidating to drop new people into" is to keep improving the wiki
#tanteksetting up a second parallel universe just makes more work
#tantekand in a volunteer setting where most don't do a lot of general content improvement, "more work" = fail
#KevinMarks_the 'what is" editing model does do that
#tantekthanks everyone for providing such thoughtful opinions / reasoning
snarfed joined the channel
#tantekKevinMarks, would appreciate your opinions in particular since you were a remote participant during the leaders summit
#gRegorLoveGood point. At least the home page is in the same wiki-edit flow currently. *if* the home page were a different platform, I think a goal for that should being able to pull in upcoming events automatically.
#tantekbear, at some point when I'm more cognizant I'd like to deep dive on a gentlemen's debate on merits/downsides of using subdomains. I feel have things to learn from you.
#aaronpkif the home page is ever not actually a mediawiki page it is *definitely* going to pull in events automatically
#bearwilling to go into more depth for any of this
#tantekI'd really like a chance to "just" update the home page with markup+CSS to look like whatever "magical" design people are imagining
#tantekinstead of leaping to "we need new plumbing for my hypothetical magical new content+CSS design"
#aaronpkfeel free to! there's nothing stopping anyone from making significant changes to the home page to make it prettier. if you're worried about "breaking" things, then copy it to a page under your user page and experiment there
#bearaaronpk - if subdomains are not selected then will we have to reserve a few /url's within nginx so the wiki doesn't get called for them?
#aaronpkyeah we should probably do that for anything we're expecting to have in the near future
#bearthat's kinda like stop words for mysql - we will need to have placeholder pages inside the wiki warning people about it
#aaronpkthere's going to be some slight weird/awkwardness around creating links to the non-wiki things from inside the wiki
#aaronpknormally you can use [[page]] syntax from the wiki to link to other wiki pages, but we'll lose that for any URLs on indieweb.org that aren't actually in the wiki
#bear(winking) yep, that's why I love subdomains ;)
#tantekaaronpk, I don't feel the urgency (yet) to redesign the home page