Loqinotifications in the context of the IndieWeb refer to all forms and ways that an independent web site can receive a message indicating something of interest (server notifications), and potentially relay that information (preferably in realtime) to one or more devices used by the owner of that site (client notifications) https://indieweb.org/clustering
tantekyet another IndieWebCamp participant had their WordPress site "owned" taken over / hacked / couldn't login etc. This one relatively recent version of WordPress (from no later than December 2015)
aaronpkyeah at this point i'm basically unwilling to install wordpress on my own server. i'll run it on dreamhost if i have to because they handle sandboxing it and proactively scan it for hacks.
LoqiA web action is the interface and user experience of taking a specific discrete action, across the web, from one site to another site or application https://indieweb.org/webactions
loicm__, Pierre-O, frzn and nitot joined the channel
tantek!tell ChrisAldrich could you add a "Travel & Lodging" section to IWC LA similar to https://indieweb.org/2016#Travel_.26_Lodging ? (looking for nearby / recommended hotel suggestions, beach proximity a plus :) )
LoqiThe Gillmor Gang is a weekly podcast hosted by Steve Gillmor who has perennially discussed topics relating to the bleeding edge of web technology as they relate to social media, journalism, and modern life https://indieweb.org/Gillmor_Gang
LoqiJust generated this week's newsletter! You still have a few minutes to make changes, and I'll re-generate it 10 minutes before it gets sent out at 2pm Pacific time. https://indieweb.org/this-week/2016-09-02.html
snarfedany WP people know why the webmention plugin might stop sending outbound wms? i think they stopped on my site a while ago. :/ i was on plugin v2.6.0, now on 3.0.0 (head of pfefferle's repo), but still no luck
dmaczkai.e. say I write a blog post and link to a shortened url t.co/whatever, when I send a webmention, should the target=t.co/whatever or follow the 302?
tantekas well as pages being created, if a page goes from just a one line #redirect to having more than one line of content, it's essentially a New Page
dmaczkaif the sender is expected to follow redirects, that makes the receiver varification a bit easier, i.e. receiver can immediately reject hostnames it does not control
dmaczkasknebel, yeah, that does make sense... so I guess on the receiving end, the receiver can really only syncronously reject on schemes, not hostname?
dmaczkaI guess the part of the spec I'm wondering about is "The receiver SHOULD check that target is a valid resource for which it can accept Webmentions. This check SHOULD happen synchronously to reject invalid Webmentions before more in-depth verification begins."
dmaczkait would seem, if the purpose of doing async verification is to limit DoS attacks, we'd want to avoid HTTP requests in the synchronous phase, no?
tantekdmaczka, sknebel, while very much on-indieweb-topic, details about Webmention and HTTP requests are probably better suited (and more focused) for #indieweb-dev
Loqiaaronpk: tantek left you a message 8 minutes ago: how hard would it be for /this-week "New Wiki Pages" to include pages that transitioned from redirect->"actual content"
aaronpkthat's definitely a pretty big extra step in processing, because i'd have to go fetch each page on the recent changes list and also fetch its revision history