2016-10-23 UTC
KevinMarks joined the channel
# 00:28 GWG Reading the latest version of the Micropub specification
wolftune, KevinMarks, sl007, snarfed, mlncn, awolf and tantek joined the channel
# 04:47 Loqi Ok, I'll tell them that when I see them next
# 04:49 KartikPrabhu in any case, for the time being I don't find PuSH very useful for my site so I'll drop looking at it
awolf joined the channel
# 04:50 tantek KartikPrabhu: the realtime aspect is pretty awesome
# 04:50 tantek e.g. when I publish a post, people see it in their woodwind within seconds - without polling
# 04:50 tantek and clearly you appreciate "realtime" since you appreciate using IRC :)
# 04:51 KartikPrabhu i think spec or wiki (if not already) might want to emphasise why it is useful instead of "old way is bad"
# 04:52 tantek because then *every* subscriber that consues PuSH sees my posts in realtime, whether folks on various Statusnet sites, or Woodwind, or etc.
# 04:55 Loqi PubSub, also known as PubSubHubbub or PuSH is a notification-based protocol for publishing and subscribing to streams and legacy feed files in real time https://indieweb.org/PuSH
snarfed joined the channel
# 05:00 KartikPrabhu tantek: I don't post anything that needs realtime updates at the moment so not for me.
# 05:06 snarfed KartikPrabhu: polling may not be bad for you as a small indie site, or single-user reader, but it can definitely be bad (or at least a challenge) for big publishers and big shared reader services (and other apps)
# 05:07 KartikPrabhu yeah, my argument was that with PuSH the hub has to send "fat pings" or your subscribers will fetch your post almost simultaneously; whereas with polling it is more likely to be randomly timed
# 05:09 snarfed KartikPrabhu: eh you can easily throttle pings (as people mentioned earlier), but you can't throttle other people polling you
# 05:10 snarfed eh you throttle over seconds or minutes. tradeoff btw realtime "enough" vs load
# 05:10 KartikPrabhu fair enough, in any case this all seems theoretical to me at the moment. maybe because I haven't run into this issue
# 05:11 snarfed right! like i mentioned, as a small indie site or user of a self-hosted reader, the only value of push to you (if any) is the realtime part
# 05:16 KartikPrabhu snarfed: as a curiousity would it be easier if Twitter sent PuSH notifications to Bridgy?
# 05:16 snarfed sure! bridgy actually did use twitter realtime for a while
# 05:17 snarfed but you need a stream per user, and twitter doesn't really support that over ~100 users
awolf joined the channel
# 05:17 KartikPrabhu I suppose the one use-case for me would be to send a PuSH to Bridgy when I post something so I don't have to tell it to crawl everytime
# 05:18 snarfed KartikPrabhu: you mean you go push the "crawl now" button every time you post?!?
# 05:18 KartikPrabhu no only sometimes, because my posting is very infrequent so Bridgy waits a long time
# 05:19 snarfed "poll now" is a simple post, you could definitely automate that if you want
tantek, KevinMarks_, snarfed, KevinMarks and smcgregor joined the channel
KevinMarks, KevinMarks_, sl007, Pierre-O and ricardokirkner joined the channel
sl007, friedcell, pindonga, loicm and mlncn joined the channel
# 14:36 Loqi jeena has 41 karma (34 in this channel)
neanias, loicm, tantek, awolf, KevinMarks, snarfed, ncollig, nikivi, Pierre-O, KevinMarks_, emmak, sl007, KartikPrabhu, jkphl, Jo1, friedcell and mlncn joined the channel