[keithjgrant]Well, it picked up webmentions from aaronpk and snarfed, so I did something right. Replies on Twitter and that reply from cleverdevil didn't come through
GWGaaronpk: Someone was suggesting that tags might link to a page about the subject of the tag over the view of all things tagged with same. I was trying to find some prior art.
aaronpkKevinMarks1: yeah Paprika exports just text for the instructions. I realized that not all my instructions really make sense in a list so I just made mine text too
miklb_, tolerablyjake and KevinMarks joined the channel
aaronpkI need to update my 2012 article about OAuth 2.0 based on the latest recommendations from the state of OAuth, and I'm struggling with how to handle that. Should I just update the post? Should I add a warning notice in the affected areas and link to a new post? This post is linked to in hundreds of GitHub repos and who knows where else, so I want to make sure it's up to date but I don't want to rewrite
aaronpkooh maybe I can make a new post dated now, and then turn the old post into a redirect to the new post, then post a copy of the old post at a new URL and link to the old version from the new post. hmm
aaronpkI don't want to do the easy version which is link to a new post from the old one, because I want people arriving there from links elsewhere on the internet to always see the current one
snarfed, tantek, asteres, KevinMarks and nitot joined the channel
KartikPrabhuaaronpk: maybe redirect the old URLs to the new post, and then "archive" the older post at some other URL. Then link the new URL of the old post from the new post which is now at the old URL!
aaronpkyeah the w3c way of doing this is a pretty good solution too. The canonical spec URL is always the latest and there are always dated snapshots too
aaronpkI put a banner at the top of my IRC post, but I think I'm going to do the replacing trick with this one because i don't want people to have to click again to read the new version
[jeremycherfas]Wondering, is there an way to check microformats in a local dev environment? Don’t like having to push changes out to production just to see whether they work.
ncolligHi folks! Does anyone have advice on the most convenient app to post and share content from my android mobile to my Known website? (if such a thing exists)
[jeremycherfas]Thanks Zegnat. And I feel I’m probably out of my depth. When I put a single post into the validator at indiewebify.me, it finds the h-entry stuff and suggests I should add an author card. So I’ve been trying to do that, but it is not being picked up. Should it be within the h-entry div, or outside it?
[dgold]tantek - while I won't disagree with your final conclusion (joking) I think the authorship page has given me more of an understanding of the 'why'
GWGI like x, I write plugins other people use. some of them don't like x. So I said, fine, I will add a disable x setting. Your choice. You don't like x, you don't need x. Then someone files a bug report about x with a over why your plugin doesn't play nice with theirs
GWGIf my decision was such a good one, then so many ys wouldn't ask about it. That is why I turned it off by default... I figured if only I liked it, no one else should be forced to deal with it
KartikPrabhuGWG: listening to feedback is good, but ultimately you can never please everyone so you will have to decide on one approach after you take in the feedabck
GWGShould I: Build only features I like, build scaffolding for features I don't like so someone else could easily plug them in, or build things for others when it isn't something that is too complicated and would not be worth the effort?
petermolnarmeanwhile I found an interesting project: awstats 404 page -> try to generate redirects for any, potentially moved resource, 403 (and eventually fail2ban) for anything that is no linked and should not be accessed (eg. wp-login.php), and find missing resources