2017-02-04 UTC
KevinMarks_ joined the channel
# 00:28 tantek I'm curious what others think of this, especially in comparison to a "repost" of an entire article
# 00:28 tantek aaronpk, that's part of the challenge, to actually figure out a reasonable definition
# 00:28 tantek that's not just the same as "repost of an article"
# 00:29 tantek OOPS, newsletter email has next week's event as a "Recent Event" not Upcoming!
# 00:29 aaronpk i've never reposted an article. the closest is i've posted a bookmark with a blockquote of text from the article
# 00:31 tantek ok that's why it only showed your one bookmark
# 00:38 sknebel re the blogspam issue: in the context of link aggregators like reddit, I'd say "blogspam" is submitting (a link to) a post that doesn't add anything over an original source. E.g. when a news site reports something, submit that, not a blog post that's reporting on the fact that the someone else has reported on something
# 00:39 sknebel typically those posts quote extensively from the original source, but not always
# 00:40 tantek sknebel - the author of that post seems to have defined it as just copying the original, which sounds like it could just be a repost
# 00:42 aaronpk a repost of an article that does not acknowledge the original source is definitely one form of blogspam
Pierre-O joined the channel
# 00:43 tantek I think the point is that even if it *does* acknowledge the original source, if you submit the repost to a bookmark/link aggregation service, then you are "blogspamming" (verb not noun)
# 00:43 aaronpk i've seen that a lot. i get pingbacks from those often
# 00:43 sknebel tantek: it's not 100% (to me) if they only mean 1:1 copying of the text (Iet's call that a repost, if it has the source properly attributed) or include posts that include just the same information and don't add anything to it
# 00:43 tantek I'm trying to separate clumsiness from mal-intent
# 00:43 tantek that is, if someone is just "clumsy" at doing a repost, I think that is different than intentional blogspamming
# 00:44 sknebel if you get overly strict with the latter even some tech news reports become "blogspam", if they only quote from a company press release
# 00:44 tantek where someone is trying to "steal" the credit / traffic for an article from someone else
# 00:44 tantek sure, that's part of the problem with getting this definition right
# 00:44 tantek people used to repost articles all the time and call it "reblogging"
# 00:44 tantek back when blog posts were all articles, before Tumblr even
# 00:45 tantek and "reblogging" was seen as a *good thing* a way to promote the original author / content, but just using your own site to do so
# 00:45 tantek This is essentially what "share" on Facebook does today
# 00:45 sknebel what I also liked back then that they often included a chain where its from
# 00:46 tantek however I think G+ made (originally? still?) made the mistake of making shares of shares be derivative, rather than transparent to the original
# 00:46 sknebel "found via X via Y via Z" or something like that at the bottom, which was nice for discovering other interesting blogs
# 00:46 tantek so if someone shared a share of your article, you would never see the reshare, you would just see one "share" of your article
# 00:47 Loqi A repost on the indieweb is a post that is purely a 100% re-publication of another post. The act of reposting is an umbrella term that covers the general practice of republishing another post typically on the same service or silo, but more and more across sites https://indieweb.org/repost
# 01:01 KevinMarks_ Another part of this is news orgs reporting some other orgs article, especially when the original is behind a paywall
EHLOVader, begriffs and snarfed joined the channel
singpolyma joined the channel
# 02:09 KartikPrabhu I had that objection a few years ago when the whole "redesign the save icon" became a thing
tantek, mlncn and leg joined the channel
# 03:20 KevinMarks_ My point is more subtle. Abolish the save icon. Keep all the versions.
# 03:21 tantek "save" is potentially useful to keep as "explicit version with comment about changes"
# 03:22 tantek aaronpk: because HyperCard+HyperTalk was proprietary and HTML+JS was open
# 03:26 KartikPrabhu KevinMarks_: how does one keep all versions on say a Micropub client? Automatically save every x-seconds?
KevinMarks joined the channel
# 03:36 tantek from a UX perspective, is each addition/deletion keystroke a version ala Etherpad?
# 03:36 tantek then the content is only kept locally in the form field per the browser's own save/restore of the form field functionality
# 03:37 aaronpk i like the idea of save being the explicit version with comment
# 03:37 aaronpk i've done that by copying files and renaming them before
# 03:38 tantek I also like the "minor revision" detail, though I feel like that should be semi-automatable? e.g. auto-detect mere typo / grammar fixes?
# 03:38 KevinMarks I didn't say that this was easy, but it is definitely a direction we are moving towards
# 03:39 aaronpk when i'm working with music in Logic Pro, it auto-saves everything, but sometimes i want a snapshot at a point in time so i'll save a copy with a new filename
# 03:40 tantek KartikPrabhu: the default (minimum) is that a micropub server would not keep any versions, just the most recent update
# 03:42 KevinMarks This also maps to the functional programming view of the world
# 03:45 tantek that seems to ignore costs, e.g. both in complexity and amount of storage
# 03:47 tantek KevinMarks: re: is that "save": per mediawiki, that *is* the Save verb: "Save page"
KevinMarks_ joined the channel
# 03:57 aaronpk oh yeah and Final Cut Pro doesn't even have a "save" option. everything you do is saved automatically
j12t and tantek joined the channel
EHLOVader joined the channel
# 04:35 KevinMarks_ Which was keep just the current version of the edits, not all the edited out bits
# 04:41 KevinMarks_ Databases are like that too, they're append only a lot of the time, so you need to dump+restore to clean out the stale bits
EHLOVader, snarfed and KevinMarks joined the channel
# 05:18 KartikPrabhu anyone have a good CSS naming convention for h-cards? I don't want to use h-card for styling
wolftune joined the channel
# 05:19 KartikPrabhu particularly I am currently styling using .h-card .u-photo which is getting annoying due to mixing mf2 and styles
tantek joined the channel
# 05:52 tantek what I've been doing for my own site / class names, is using a *generic* plain word for local semantics to be style with CSS class selector
# 05:53 tantek e.g. just "card" or "person" for h-card and "photo" for photo etc.
# 05:53 aaronpk I typically use "photo" along with "u-photo" and style the .photo
# 05:53 tantek keeps your stylesheet and rules looking nicer and cleaner
# 05:54 tantek we're up to 8 cities for sure, and if we get LA that would be 9, a new record!
# 05:54 tantek also Berlin and Scranton are doing the first HWC this coming week!
begriffs joined the channel
# 05:57 KartikPrabhu I have some articles that use those styles so I have to fix their markup first :P
KevinMarks joined the channel
# 06:02 KartikPrabhu it is very tempting to just use the mf2 classes since they are already there, but then moving mf2 markup around affects the style of things which is annoying
tantek, userXYZ and KevinMarks joined the channel
Pierre-O and KevinMarks_ joined the channel
miklb, KevinMarks, KevinMarks_ and jeremycherfas joined the channel
CherryPuffs, Pierre-O, Kopfstein, Yilmaz_Erkan, nitot_, sebsel, mlncn, davidmead, nitot and benborges joined the channel
mlncn and nitot joined the channel
hs0ucy, KevinMarks, miklb, davidmead and Pierre-O joined the channel
mlncn, nitot and Pierre-O joined the channel
# 17:32 davidmead Just noticed “badges” from Untappd get posted to Twitter, but don’t appear in the RSS feed, so don’t show up on my blog :-(
wolftune, mlncn and tantek joined the channel
# 18:36 GWG So last night I implemented original of
snarfed joined the channel
# 18:46 GWG I saw other people had it and was working on Syndication Links anyway. Not sure what to best do with it
wolftune, snarfed, KartikPrabhu, nitot and leg joined the channel
# 19:38 aaronpk it's like i get to have a bunch of mini-blogs that way
tantek joined the channel
# 19:46 GWG aaronpk: Got an example of what makes things fun?
# 19:47 GWG I'm not sure if WordPress can do that on a tag page.
# 19:48 GWG In the meantime, I have to update your timezone code.
# 19:49 GWG Or rather, update my usage of it now that it is a library instead of something I ripped out of your repo
# 19:49 aaronpk ah cool. nothing changed functionally, you can just install it as a library now
# 19:52 GWG aaronpk: I know. I just figured I could make my usage of it 'cleaner'.
mlncn, funwhilelost and [dgold] joined the channel
# 20:36 [dgold] has never seen an error like <class 'sqlalchemy.exc.OperationalError'> before.
davidmead and [kevinmarks] joined the channel
mlncn, snarfed, nitot, wolftune, Lana, [aaronpk], leg and KevinMarks joined the channel
# 23:34 Loqi [indieweb] "Day 46: Expanding the IRC/Slack Gateway to all IndieWeb Channels #100DaysOfIndieWeb" on 2017-02-04
nikivi, wolftune and KevinMarks joined the channel