2017-03-19 UTC
# 00:05 snarfed pfefferle's, 3.2.0, at 99f3f250cb94771b0ae56dc0f5c853d827fee169
[kevinmarks] joined the channel
# 00:12 GWG snarfed: Just asking because you filed an issue on acegiak's issue tracker. acegiak's version is the salmention mods.
begriffs, snarfed and tantek joined the channel
# 01:17 snarfed GWG: yup! it's always confused me that both acegiak's repo and pfefferle's fork have issues enabled, and have separate sets of issues
# 01:17 snarfed i understand that acegiak's is salmentions, but imho maintaining both as divergent for so long has actively discouraged other contributors, including me
# 01:18 GWG snarfed: acegiak has said that pfefferle's branch is the root one.
# 01:18 snarfed i've nudged them both consistently over time to merge them. (similar to how i've advocated for merging the webmention and semantic linkbacks asap!)
# 01:18 snarfed GWG: sure. i understand. it's still confusing though. not a good long term state.
# 01:19 GWG snarfed: I'm trying to fix that issue by moving features over to Webmentions over time.
# 01:19 GWG I could write a merged plugin, but I think without working on some of those issues, it would add more confusion
# 01:19 snarfed ok! i just wonder about timeline. seems like those kinds of efforts have been in flight for...years?
# 01:19 GWG snarfed: Actually, I've only thought about it seriously since the Summit
# 01:20 snarfed ok. i've been harrassing them to merge the forks for years at least
# 01:23 GWG If you look at the code now, versus a year ago, there have been major changes.
# 01:24 GWG snarfed: Just, there is still the problem of 'like', 'bookmark', etc being stored as meta, for example.
# 01:25 GWG The fact that the display is built dynamically...so some of the enhancements vanish if you disable the plugin
# 01:36 snarfed yup! understood, they're definitely nontrivial codebases
# 01:36 snarfed and thank you for all the work you do! much appreciated
# 01:37 GWG snarfed: I wish I had more hours in the day.
# 01:37 GWG As last night indicates, I should be careful when I'm tired.
begriffs, KartikPrabhu, wolftune, begriffs_ and mlncn joined the channel
wolftune, tantek, gRegorLove, techlifeweb, snarfed, jkphl, Pierre-O, mlncn, catsup, DanC, Kopfstein, davidmead and [kevinmarks] joined the channel
snarfed, Pierre-O and Pierre-O1 joined the channel
# 17:11 snarfed heads up for anyone scraping instagram's html/json, they changed it (non-backward compatible) recently, so you'll need to update your code
wolftune joined the channel
# 17:19 GWG Playing in other people's playgrounds is hard
begriffs, Lana, leg, rrix and [kevinmarks] joined the channel
wolftune, LanaCoyote, LanaCoyote_ and [eddie] joined the channel
# 19:58 [eddie] I believe I saw that there is an effort to standardize the Open Source Licenses that indieweb projects use? I tried to search around for it but didn’t find anything. Is there a specific license decided upon to try to standardize on?
davidmead joined the channel
DanC joined the channel
# 21:09 Zegnat [eddie], please do weigh in on the licensing issue if you have an opinion on the matter
tantek joined the channel
# 21:24 aaronpk ownyourswarm is going to use micropub updates to add checkin photos
# 21:27 aaronpk since the photo is not present in the initial checkin
mlncn and Pierre-O joined the channel
# 22:04 aaronpk huh I never realized that you could include multiple photos in a foursquare checkin
[kevinmarks] joined the channel
# 22:06 [kevinmarks] Look at tantek and zeldman's points battle - checkins with microformats, multiple photos
mlncn_ and [eddie] joined the channel
# 22:15 [eddie] Zegnat: not too much on my side. I tend towards MIT, but don’t have super strong feelings ?
tantek and snarfed joined the channel
# 22:51 tantek technology that makes you go somewhere to test it is a good thing
# 22:51 tantek aaronpk, yes, Swarm does multi-photo checkin posts
snarfed joined the channel
# 22:52 tantek my bookmarklet still worked as of late last night
# 22:53 tantek well, "worked" within current limitations. only for first photo (e.g. if it's a multi-photo post), and only for photos not ideos
KartikPrabhu joined the channel
# 22:54 tantek ok cool. my bookmarklet was "dumb" enough for it to keep working even after the multi-photo launch (surprisingly)
# 22:57 snarfed that's for news feed at least. i suspect permalinks and profiles are later or not at all
squeakytoy joined the channel
# 23:12 Loqi aaronpk has 477 karma in this channel (1243 overall)
# 23:14 tantek waits for OwnYourGram and OwnYourSwarm to show up in the micropub implementation report
# 23:14 tantek wonders if they pass micropub client tests ;)
# 23:15 aaronpk i submitted one manually for ownyourgram already!
# 23:16 tantek good thing I documented the 7 photo (multi-photo) support!
# 23:16 tantek this is why I wiki, to help aaronpk make editorial fixes to his blog posts ;)
# 23:20 tantek interesting, ownyourcheckin also waits 30s before querying in order to get the image!
KevinMarks joined the channel
# 23:22 aaronpk KevinMarks: oh that might be because ownyourswarm requests "create" scope and Known is expecting "post". Try tweaking the scope in the authorization request when you sign in.
snarfed joined the channel
# 23:29 KevinMarks I'm running woodwind as a pwa homepage app so I don't have an address bar
# 23:31 KevinMarks Trying in chrome and changing scope to post gives the same error so it's known not understanding json most likely
singpoly1a joined the channel
gRegorLove joined the channel