#KartikPrabhuaaronpk: that is actually a good point. source with fragments will link to the actual place but will retain the context in the whole post!
#martymcguire[m]aaronpk: I haven't sent those mentions-with-fragments yet, just regular mentions. I could figure out a workflow for doing that with telegraph I think.
#aaronpki suppose the next question is whether i should treat a URL with a fragment ID as a distinct mention or not
#GWGDo we have any examples of this, save media fragments in the wild?
#martymcguire[m]Basically: go to time offset, pause to let the JS update the URL, load the URL in telegraph, send just for the audio post in question, repeat for all fragments
#KartikPrabhuaaronpk: I think I do already by default. my webmention receiver matches the complete source URL
#aaronpki think mine does too. is that the desired behavior?
#aaronpkproblem is I would render them the same, so they would look like duplicates
#[keithjgrant]Does anybody use any interesting strategies for displaying reposts? 9 times out of 10, it’s usually a twitter retweet (via brid.gy) or someone sharing it with a comment that is simply the title of the post -- so in these cases it makes sense to just show the author name & the url. But that 1/10 times they add a comment which I'd like to display
#[keithjgrant]But I haven't been able to come up with a good strategy for distinguishing meaningful comments from the others
#sknebel[keithjgrant]: I'd suggest collecting examples, and then trying to come up with a comparison algorithm... something like "if it contains words that are not the original title and are not "repost", then display" or something like that
#sknebelalso, I'm not sure if the repost-with-comment is considered purely a repost or not, e.g. the twitter example on /repost and /reposts all show the "plain" form
#sknebeldgold: wm.io probably means webmention.io, a webmention receiver service by aaron
#miklbthe reason I suggested the https issue is that I don't get that on my dev install locally
wolftune joined the channel
#GWGBasically, all the JS code does is request an object from the PHP code and set form fields based on it.
#GWGMy likely solution is to delve into that a bit. Also, I do have redesign on that area I want to do, to allow an autofill when triggered by Micropub and such
#miklbif i get time, I'll try to see if I can do some deeper debugging on my live site. Juggling a few things at the moment.
#tanteklistens in on the quote vs reply conversation
snarfed, snarfed1, miklb, nitot, [kevinmarks], [cleverdevil], adactio, aquarius__, gRegorLove, sonicrocketman, raretrack and mlncn joined the channel
#tantekright now when a post shows "Mentions" (beyond specific comments, likes etc.)
wolftune joined the channel
#tantekif a user clicks on one of those mentions links to go to the original, if it's a small note it works fine (the mention in context is likely obvious), but if the original response is long text, perhaps an article with sections and subheadings, and LOTS of mentions, then the context of the mention is lost / difficult to find
#tanteknow what if that long article mentions a post multiple times? e.g. in multiple sections?
#tantekif the "mentions" section of that post were to only link to the whole article, or to just one of the specific fragments, then the fact that the article mentioned a post multiple times would be lost
#tantekso to back that up a step into a how question:
#tantekif an article mentions another post multiple times, what would the author of that original post want to display?
#tantekone thought: if an article linked to one of my posts in multiple contexts, it would be nice to be able to indicate that on *my* post, e.g. in such a Mentions section:
#tantekwhere Article Name would link to the whole article, and the ^n links would link to fragments of the paragraph or section of the specific mentions of my post
#tantekIdeally that's what I'd like to show on my original post from a presentation perspective
#tantekand I think such a design could also address aaronpk's concern of "would look like duplicates" - as I too would only want "Article Name" to be listed *once* in my mentions
#tantek(no matter how many times it links to my post)
#tantek(hence the ^1... ^n parenthetical links to potentially list the specific mentions in context for easier navigation / discoverability)
#tanteklike you might see in a traditional print book Index at the end, Some Topic, p. 17, 23, 58
#tantekthe Index is both saying "Some Topic" is mentioned in the book, and the specific page numbers where it was mentioned (so you can go look at just those specific pages instead of having to search the whole book for the mention)
#Loqi[tantek] right now when a post shows "Mentions" (beyond specific comments, likes etc.)
wolftune, [kevinmarks], KartikPrabhu, nitot, snarfed, leg and [dgold] joined the channel
#[dgold]If posting a reply-to to a website via webmention, and additionally POSSEing that response to silos, how should one contextualise the POSSEd elements?
#[dgold]Or, indeed, should one POSSE the reply at all?
#[dgold]Thanks tantek, I was thinking also about a reply to (from personal experience today) a persons Known instance. I POSSEd that response to silos (twitter and pnut)
#[dgold]My reply post is here, it links to the two silos:
#Loqi[Daniel Goldsmith] Best of luck with that Bjorn; if you get some headway with the reactions plugin, I can think of a number of people who'd be interested
#[dgold]The twitter post gives context (because the Idno people are awesome) extracted from the known post I was replying to.
#Loqipnut is a short-messaging social network silo in which messages have a limited length, and you can follow folks, and be followed by folks https://indieweb.org/pnut
KartikPrabhu and snarfed joined the channel
#gRegorLoveHah, I thought at first pnut was someone's handle
#gRegorLoveInteresting they're using Patreon to fund development.
#gRegorLove[dgold]: Have you (or anyone) suggested they add mf2 to pnut?
#tantekthat is interesting, since it's an ongoing payment model instead of just one-time like kickstarter
#gRegorLoveAlso "When you invite someone, they are associated with you in the user tree and you may be responsible for them if they abuse the network."
#aaronpkit's also possible the iPod GPS doesn't get enough location data in the background to make any suggestions
snarfed joined the channel
#aaronpker, iPod location services. there is no GPS.
#tantektoo bad it can't bluetooth it from my watch which is more accurate than iPhone GPS :P
#aaronpkthat's actually not that far fetched. there are external GPS devices you can buy that connect via bluetooth to iOS and then all the iOS location services use that data instead
#tantekwait what - how do you configure iOS to use an external GPS device?
#aaronpkif the device advertises that it supplies GPS data, then when you pair it it just goes
#aaronpkand it's at the system level, so all apps will start using that
#aaronpka common use for this is for pilots to use a better GPS receiver and then pull up maps on an ipad in the plane
#aaronpk"The majority of iPad devices sold by Apple are the Wi-Fi only models, which do not have an internal GPS receiver. Our products provide rock-solid GPS to these iPads and allow you to see your own-ship position in any EFB app."
#[kevinmarks]Wouldn't it be great if passenger planes just broadcast that to the devices on board
#tantekinteresting, I just paired my iPod to my watch from iPod Bluetooth settings
#tanteknow how do I tell it to use the GPS from my watch?
#aaronpkif the watch supports it, it will be doing it already
#tantekI can't tell if it made any difference. I may need a realtime location info graphing app to see
#tantekalso I think my watch turns off bluetooth and GPS automatically to save battery, so I have to figure out how to put it in a "report location continuously" mode