aaronpk.... i think i'lll have everything default to private. i think i'm past the point where i think people will get value from all my content. sometimes i just post stuff that might have been cool 5 years ago but doesn't have as much value now
LoqiWelcome to the Indie Web Summit 2017 page for planning, brainstorming, and generally all things looking forward to IndieWebSummit 2017 in Portland, Oregon https://indieweb.org/IndieWebSummit
[karaemurphy]I have a creative name for the photo but I need to write a post explaining how I legally captured this image. Part 107 rules are still a bit strict but there are workarounds. I need to blog more.
tantek[karaemurphy]: I recommend importing into Medium for additional distribution. Own your content on your own site, but also import to Medium for a broader audience.
bignosegRegorLove: thanks. the question is less about choosing software, and more about choosing hosting; do I need to choose and run all the pieces myself, or is there an easier option that sitll retains all the control needed for POSSE?
tantekhuh, Netflix just prompted me "Now it's easier to tell us what you like. ? ? " / "Rate TV shows & movies to improve your suggestions." / "Your previous star ratings will still be used to personalize your Netflix experience."
deathrow1does anyone have an example of a software dev contract clause stating that some of the material delivered can be released as open source/FOSS/FLOSS?
deathrow1"3. The CUSTOMER can choose to license material delivered under this agreement, in whole or in part, for third party usage including, but not limited to, open source licenses for public use. The CUSTOMER retains aforementioned ownership of the material, including copyright, but can transfer it to the CONTRACTOR or a third party. The scope of material licensed, ownership, and which license to apply, must be agreed upon in writing, and can not be wi
[kevinmarks]deathrow1: I have done this before, but it depends on the structure of the contract. In general I have changed the copyright assignment section to exclude open source code. This may be better for #dev though
nitot, jeremycherfas_, jmelesky and [keithjgrant] joined the channel
[jeremycherfas]Given how many different approaches people have to doing indieweb, and how not easy it is at the moment, the idea of a single cute logo is liable to give people a very false impression.
[cleverdevil]That said, I do think that Mastodon is going to represent a bit of a challenge to Micro.blog, and I am unhappy with the timing of its little popularity burst at the moment ?
[manton]snarfed That was essentially my take as well. I wish I knew what the paid plans looked like. Are these for smaller developers or for enterprise customers? (And the older search results, currently you can't get _anything_ past a week from the API, so I guess paid archives is an improvement.)
[manton]Oh. But I assume you to set up the various Mastodon pieces like WebFinger to hook that up, right? I thought you meant it could discover a feed on it's own.
aaronpkif that gets added, then the next step would be adding webmention sending, then webmention receiving, then it would be a pretty solid player in the indieweb space
tantekdgold++ exactly. the entirety of Mastodon's sudden popularity among a slightly wider set of folks than Identica and Gnu Social can be credited to their *simple* UI that just looks like old twitter
gRegorLoveMastodon's popularity is interesting to me in that it's a halfway step between silo and your own site. I was wondering last night if the pain points of Mastodon might push people more towards their own site.
[chrisaldrich]It's been interesting seeing the huge uptick in activity on Mastodon.social's github account this past week. The attention is helping it do more than just add users.
[manton]chrisaldrich I hope it will scale fairly well. Timeline caching, blog publishing, and photo storage are designed to split across multiple servers.
aaronpkmy interest in it extends only to the extent that it seems they did some things right in order to grow this large so quickly. I want to learn from that.
[chrisaldrich]manton The benefit of watching Mastodon right now is to see what the pain points may be. As part of the community, I'm happy to help people in the onboarding process when the time comes.
[chrisaldrich]As a community, that will also be a good time for all of us to help people to create their own sites that will work in conjunction with/along side of micro.blog.
LoqiMastodon is an open source implementation of a federated social network with several running instances that is compatible with GNU Social https://indieweb.org/Mastodon
[chrisaldrich]I've got a group known instance at http://known.boffosocko.com that you can create an account at to test-drive a bit if you like. It supports syndicating to twitter and you can set up brid.gy for backfeed as well.
[kiai]Will need major security on the site, because of financial information. The platform is a way for individuals to make tax-deductible donations of goods and services to other individuals.
dgoldthe `hide sensitive content` facility is also well done -- but hardly likely to succeed in its stated goal of creating a `safe space`, as its dependent on user goodwill at creation time
[chrisaldrich]my personal site is 0.9.2, but I spun up a group site for fun the other day that's running the master branch (http://known.boffosocko.com if you want to test-drive)
[cleverdevil]Clips is an [[iOS]] app from [[Apple]] that lets you create video "stories" made popular by [[Snapchat]] and now copied by [[Instagram]] and [[Facebook]]. Interestingly, Clips doesn't have a built in social network, and instead allows you to share to any network or simply to save the video file to your device for sharing elsewhere. Clips can be found on the iOS app store here - https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/clips/id1212699939?mt=8
[chrisaldrich]Interestingly I was having a chat with larand less than 30minutes ago on 10C about indieweb. Glad to see he's slipping down the rabbithole with us.
[chrisaldrich]they may have switched back recently for possible latency issues they're facing? Or maybe changed it in github source for the benefit of other instances, and didn't change it back manually on a re-deploy?
gRegorLovetrack.superfeedr.com doesn't seem to include PuSHes I send to my username hub there, gregorlove.superfeedr.com, or at least Loqi isn't showing them if so.