KartikPrabhumiklb: you don't need to put a p-name on the note content since mf2 parsing auto-generates a p-name, but you might want an explicit p-name to exclude random things in the note showing up in the autogenerated name
tantekI think it's just that /note and /reply were both written before we started doing that consistently, and their markup was more "obvious" at the time (to folks who discussed it clearly, not to new folks), so such examples were unintentionally neglected
GWG[mko]: I have to explore how people will parse it. But as an in-reply-to entry may be a parsing issue due the fact it is someone else's in reply on my site.
[mko]I'm using a variety of handlebars helpers in there, but if you strip out that stuff, it's pretty straightforward and parsed properly when displaying them on my site previously.
[mko]Now, if you're not allowing true "comments" but are actually only allowing comments by way of `webmention`, then it's a different story. Then you wouldn't want the permalink of the comment to be on your site but rather on their site where they *should* have the `u-in-reply-to` implemented referencing your site.
[mko]At this point, you have a standard entry with a set of comments below it. If a user clicks on "Comment 1", it takes the user away from your site to the one referenced by Permalink 2. On their site, assuming they have proper webmention comment displays, the user can then click on their representation of "Comment 2" to visit Permalink 3 and return to your site.
[mko]And on the permanent post page for "Comment 2" you could either only show the immediate previous `u-in-reply-to` context or you could walk the chain of `u-in-reply-to` contexts by parsing each subsequent `u-in-reply-to` until you've reached the furthest parent. Not really a computationally efficient way to do it, but it's always an option.
petermolnarre Zegnat: I gather the old audioscrobbler stuff from docs I've found around, but there is nothing on the current version; I also couldn't name it anything-audioscrobbler because it's a trademark
Loqi[superfeedr] "Liked this tweet: ChrisAldrich on Twitter: “Outline of how I used #Indieweb technology to let Twitter users send @mentions to me on my own website. #WordPress https://t.co/IVY7GEVnkJ“" by Scott Kingery on 2017-04-16 http://techlifeweb.com/15852-2/
davidmead, wolftune and ben_thatmustbeme joined the channel
WaynyHi miklb & KartikPrabhu. Yes I have but at the mo. I'm looking from the very beginning & yes I do have a domain name. Never ever done anything like this b4!
KartikPrabhuWayny: you might want to take a look at WithKnown to start of https://indieweb.org/known It can be installed on your own server if that is what you'd like to do
WaynyLike I said I am new to this. This is one of few things I don't know to do. I have no knowledge apart from I would like to get this up & running as soon as I can.
KartikPrabhuI would still recommend trying out WithKnown to start with. THey seem to have guides on how to install it on various hosting services https://withknown.com/guides/
LoqiWeb hosting can be the primary regular cost in maintaining an IndieWeb site; this page lists several options from free on up depending on your publishing needs, like a static, shared, private, or dedicated server https://indieweb.org/hosting
miklbis there a mf2 class for a wrapper of the content you are replying to? I know u-in-reply-to on the actual link, curious if something like "p-in-reply" exists.