#Loqi[superfeedr] "IndieWeb Summit 2017 is upon us this weekend. If you haven’t RSVP’d it isn’t too late OR you can participate remotely." by Chris Aldrich on 2017-06-21 http://boffosocko.com/2017/06/20/indieweb-summit-2017/
#[miklb]As I mentioned, I hooked up the master branch of micropub and OYS so looking at posting them now. Currently the checkin doesn’t get a kind so throws an error when displaying the post. I’m also on fence about using simple location or just hooking up my own mapbox code to display a static map as simple location currently isn’t generating anything from the micropub post from Swarm.
#[miklb]oh, maybe it’s because it defaults to private.
#[miklb]ah, that’s right, it is because it defaults to private.
#ZegnatHmm. I find it weird that Dave Winer calls us out for having an “exclusive approach”. I guess he does it “for reasons I'm sure I don't understand”.
#aaronpkhe's going to defend RSS as long as he possibly can, at the expense of everything else, so i'm not really interested in engaging in any of those arguments
#aaronpkcweiske: i don't think we say "no h-entry no indieweb" anywhere, did you find an example of that somewhere?
j12t and [colinwalker] joined the channel
#[colinwalker]My understanding of "indieweb" was that it was actually pretty lax - your own domain plus a.n.other indieweb technology such as webmentions. There was no "one thing" that made a site indieweb or not.
#[colinwalker]That why I have RSS, JSON Feed and h-feed - it's all about choice.
#[colinwalker]He's definitely got an RSS sized chip on his shoulder (just look at the first posts he wrote about JSON Feed) but a versus approach definitely isn't the way to go.
strugee joined the channel
#cweiskewhen I crept up here i also felt pretty outsided because of all that current-tech-is-bad-we-reinvent-everything approach that is especially visible on atom+rss feed pages in the wiki
#ZegnatI think a lot of RSS criticisms have been moved to the general /feed_files page. And that applies to RSS, ATOM, JSONFeed, and even “our own” JF2
#Zegnataaronpk: I am interested in all arguments that make it seem like indieweb takes an exclusive approach. Because any such arguments need adressing, imho
#[kevinmarks]Dave on JSON: http://scripting.com/2006/12/20.html#godBlessTheReinventers "No doubt I can write a routine to parse this, but look at how deep they went to re-invent, XML itself wasn't good enough for them, for some reason (I'd love to hear the reason). Who did this travesty? Let's find a tree and string them up. Now."
#Zegnatcweiske: that (“superseded”) is a pretty good word to look up and see if we’re using it right on the wiki. Nice!
#aaronpkskimming those search results, i'd say some of them are appropriate use of the term and others should probably not claim "superseded"
#ZegnatYeah. Those where indiewebtech1 is superseded by tech2 are fine, we can claim that. I am not sure we can claim OpenID has been superseded by any other tech just yet.
#cweiskeif you remember that "superseded" on the indieweb.org wiki is the world view of a handful people and indieweb.org is not a generic encyclopedia, then it's ok
#ZegnatBut if it gives a feeling of being exclusionary, I don’t think the IndieWeb website should make those claims, cweiske. Even if the core group of indiewebtech-afficionados is of a certain opinion. That’s not what “the IndieWeb” is about.
#ZegnatI guess that circles back to: “what exactly is indieweb about” ;) I think mission statement discussion was on the agenda for some meeting somewhere?
#aaronpkfor OpenID, it's definitely deprecated, especially since the OpenID foundation has moved on to OpenID Connect. it's debatable what tech in general has superseded it, but in the indieweb realm, it has been superseded by IndieAuth
#ZegnatIs anyone else having problems with indieweb.org or is my internet dying?
#ZegnatIt is truly glacial on my end... Time to leave the wiki alone for today.
tantek, hs0ucy and [colinwalker] joined the channel
#[colinwalker]@zegnat that change definitely reads better
nitot, tantek, j12t and mlncn joined the channel
#ben_thatmustbemeRegrading JF2 Feed, I took those into consideration when writing JF2 Feed, Its written so that JF2 Feeds should be processible directly from the h-feed. Basically its just doing the HTML processing for someone else. so while it is still a side car file, and is still more code to maintain, it can be done entirely with an external service.
#tantekyes, using an external service for it mitigates much of the sidefile maintenance issue
#Zegnatben_thatmustbeme: people have successfully turned h-feed into RSS as well. What I was trying to say was that even JF2 (being “invented here”) is subject to the same criticisms as RSS as far as side-file criticisms go. Dave seems to have the weird idea that IndieWeb is against RSS for the sake of our own technologies, which simply isn’t true.
#ZegnatBut he says he has heart the arguments and doesn’t want to hear them again, so, *shrug*
#LoqiRSS is a set of XML feed file formats of varying degrees of use for syndicating time-stamped content from web sites, and sometimes used to refer more broadly to feed file formats as a whole including Atom, or even more broadly in vernacular as a synonym for feed file or even feeds or syndication as a concept https://indieweb.org/RSS
#[miklb]and now helping support IndieWeb, so definitely need to bring back webrings
#Zegnatping petermolnar, your favourite web feature is coming back!
#sknebelrandom observation regarding frontpage copy: we don't actually mention "personal sites" at all above the fold, and even later not very clearly. Suggestions where to add that back?
#sknebelthen find something to remove in it's place. From recent feedback (which of course also is just individual anecdotes), it seems like the idea of putting your own site at the center isn't all that clear in the beginning. If someone then goes to "get started", suddenly they are prompted to have a domain, which is the first time that comes up at all
eli_oat joined the channel
#sknebelTo me initial copy right now seems a bit too much about goals (control data, connections) without mentioning the how (by having a personal site that's the core of everything) in any way
#sknebeland thus instead could also be trying to sell some monolithic project, another social network (with misleading advertising, but text like this can be expected to be overly positive) or something else entirely, as long as it does something with the right buzz words
#tanteksknebel - jumping into the how has the flaw of people not understanding the why - which is often the bigger challenge
#LoqiThe IndieWeb is about owning your domain, using it as your primary identity to publish on your own site (optionally syndicate elsewhere), and owning your data https://indieweb.org/IndieWeb
#sknebelI'd try to bring it in each bullet point some way. Maybe "by posting on your own site, your content stays yours and in your control" for the first and extend the last point with "On your own site, you can ..."?
#sknebelor find a place for the <dfn>, but not sure why. one could add it to the tagline, but I think a more generic tagline is good and it'd be too much
#tantek[miklb]: agreed, seems odd. could be improved
#[miklb]I’m not advocating for a direct copy of the dfn, but if that’s the canonical definition of IndieWeb, I’d think the home page could better reflect it.
#[miklb]maybe it’s time to update the dfn ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
#tanteksknebel: I agree with copy-editing the bullet points for improvement! They were heavily copy edited to begin with (mostly in 2014)
#tantekmiklb specifically for solving what problem?
#sknebel(also, for the first one "stays […] in your control" -> should that be "under your control", or is "in your control" also a correct form?
#tanteksknebel: yeah that's also a correct form - I believe Scott Jenson (UX / UI expert, writer) helped with the current wording
#sknebelok, just wanted to make sure. my proposed changes good like that, or any details to change? Or should I wait for more feedback? (it's the frontpage after all)
#tantekit's hard to see how it fits in in the context of other prose on the front page
#tantek[miklb]: re: update the dfn - are you stating a problem to be solved? or do you have a specific suggestion? either way I definitely want to encourage you to post about what "indieweb" means for *you*
#tantekthat's definitely worth a short note or article and would be great to have for citing etc.
#tantekI have a feeling "indieweb" means different things to different people and I'd like get *that* diversity captured somehow.
#ZegnatGood point tantek. I will blog about what IndieWeb means to me soon(tm)
#Loqizegnat has 49 karma in this channel (72 overall)
#[miklb]tantek my perspective is if the wiki and dfn are meant to be a collective of what IndieWeb means, the home page and that definition should be more in line. But if the home page copy is meant to better reflect what it means, then perhaps the definition needs to be reworded.
#ZegnatI think the dfn is fine, actually. More clear than the homepage in some ways: “own your own place online” is a good statement to cover IndieWeb as I see it
amz3 joined the channel
#sknebel(feel free to try other changes in that sandbox, even though it lives in my userpage)
[shanehudson] joined the channel
#[shanehudson]To me indieweb is a community of people that believe in longevity and have some level of distrust when it comes to other people controlling their data.
#sknebelcommunity is another great word to fit in somewhere. "we are not trying to sell you one thing, but are a community with shared interests that colloberates"
#tantekmiklb, agreed on converging or at least better consistency between homepage and dfn
#tantek[shanehudson]: yes, +1 on /longevity , and it is just one of several such /principles that this community of people has generally reflected and have rough consensus about
#tantekbut you can't make a single sentence that clearly states 11 principles
#tantekalso, saying things like "we are not trying to sell you one thing" is a great way to make people *more* suspicious that they are being sold something
#tantekthat's the "don't think of an elephant" problem
#sknebelomg no, that wasn't a suggestion for actual wording ;)
#sknebeland yes, that's adequately reflected in the lower section
#sknebelit's still something that comes up, but probably mostly with people who haven't really spend any time looking into it