LoqiA reply (or comment) is a kind of post that is a text (typically, though photos are possible too) response to some other post, that makes little or no sense without reading or at least knowing the context of the source post https://indieweb.org/reply
aaronpkthe one thing i find interesting about this idea is that when you want to "prove" to someone that you posted something on a certain date you can really only do so by pointing to a copy of it somewhere where you are unable to modify the creation date, e.g. a twitter copy or web.archive.org
aaronpkKartikPrabhu: well the trick on twitter is to set an account to private, write multiple tweets with different outcomes, then delete all but the desired tweet and make the account public
KartikPrabhualso I write posts with a futured publish date which counts as a draft and people with the URL can still reply to it even though it isn't published yet!
aaronpkthere are two timestamps to consider when building a /reader ... the time the post self-reports as the published time, and the time the reader found it. if you want to show the user a list of things they haven't seen yet, use the time the reader time. if you want to show a list of things in supposedly chronological order, show the published time
[manton]In Micro.blog I use the published date reported by the blog and sort on that. I had planned to do more checking to ensure the dates aren't wildly off, but in practice it hasn't been a problem yet. (Checking that they aren't in the future would solve most problems.)
mblaneythere's another way to possibly solve the timestamp issue, you could ask a 3rd party to store the timestamp and link to the post you want verified.
sknebele.g. signed executables generally have to have not only a a signature, but only a signed timestamp proving *when* they were signed (which really just is the person creating the binary going to a trusted authority and saying "here is a signature I'm attaching to my file, could you please sign a statement saying when you've seen it", which is then attached to the file as well)
sknebelcertificate transparency logs have interesting properties in that regard as well (they don't explicitly contain timestamps, but they are logs where you can detect changes to the history)
loicm, jihaisse and [kevinmarks] joined the channel
rhiaropetermolnar: aleph indexes documents like pdfs, emails, spreadsheets, and provides a frontend for sorting documents and extracted entities (people, companies, land) into collections, and cross-referencing them against other collections to see if there are overlaps. You could download a static copy of your website and have an instance of aleph ingest it, but.. I don't know why you would.. that's nto what it's for
Loqirhiaro: tantek left you a message on 2017-03-30 at 1:23am UTC: can you make it to any of the dates here? add your prefs! https://indieweb.org/Planning#Summit
Loqirhiaro: petermolnar left you a message 5 minutes ago: is it possible to use aleph as a search engine for our sites? If yes, had anyone done it so far?
petermolnarI was thinking of feeding a lot of extras beside the text to it, exif data in json, csv from sensors, etc, but that's a completely different use case; thanks :)
rhiarowhen we want to ingest already structured data sources we have to map them from the existing structure to aleph's ES data model. It's arbitrary, you might as well make your own ES backed thing that's more customised to your use case
jeremycherfasI saw someone else reading this https://static.land yesterday and thought it might be of interest here, but not sure where in the wiki to put it.
Zegnat[kevinmarks], maybe because of a bias towards self-contained platforms like Mastodon? IndieWeb doesn’t really show well as a solid network. We’re just people with websites that talk to each other.
ZegnatIt is interesting SOLID is mentioned on the list there (I haven’t read the whole thing). Are there actual websites implementing any of the SOLID stuff?
petermolnardecentralized == fragmented variety of random sofwware that can talk to eachother; this is what's missing from 99% of decentralization efforts
ZegnatI am not completely sure how useful though, [colinwalker], I still doubt at times what word should be applied to what idea ;) But that’s probably just the nature of it
Zegnatsl007, I think too few of the active IndieWeb wiki/IRC users can make it :( And journalists actually there are less likely to login to the wiki to add their names
sknebelsl007: did you have joschi retweet an announcement or something? quite a few people that were at other camps probably don't really check the wiki or anything, but might see it there
sl007OK, fun fact - meanwhile received a mail "I checked in via sched, do i have to add me to the guest list" - no idea where I can see who "checked in via sched" (which is the festivals system)
Loqi[petermolnar] decentralized == fragmented variety of random sofwware that can talk to eachother; this is what's missing from 99% of decentralization efforts
[manton]Do any of the other HWC cities use meetup.com or mailing lists to help coordinate event times, or is mostly just on the wiki and individual blog posts / tweets? Someone asked if there was a list for Austin, so want to make sure what we're doing is consistent with other cities.
sknebelgeneral consensus from a HWC organizers session was that the wiki is primarily community-internal documentation and has basically no outreach value for HWC (even if people stumble over it, they then also have to look at HWCs carefully enough to notice there is a local one, ...), to use whatever works locally and that by far the most effective thing is directly contacting/inviting people via e-mail, twitter or in person
[manton]@sknebel Got it, thank you. I like starting with a mailing list for anyone interested, but meetup.com is popular here too and probably worth looking at. (I don't use it much myself either.)
[manton]jeremycherfas Actually the beta isn't being updated anymore! You can delete it and switch to the App Store version. The App Store version has a bunch of improvements since the beta.