#LoqiA reply (or comment) is a kind of post that is a text (typically, though photos are possible too) response to some other post, that makes little or no sense without reading or at least knowing the context of the source post https://indieweb.org/reply
#amz3`Even precedence, can not be trusted, you can reply to a post that doesn't exist yet...
#KartikPrabhuamz3`: maybe, why should there be unless there is a use-case for it
#aaronpkthe one thing i find interesting about this idea is that when you want to "prove" to someone that you posted something on a certain date you can really only do so by pointing to a copy of it somewhere where you are unable to modify the creation date, e.g. a twitter copy or web.archive.org
#aaronpklike if i said "i totally said this thing 5 years ago" and sent you a link to a post on my site, you have no reason to believe it
#KartikPrabhuaaronpk: you can modify a twitter copy by deleting it and writing anothre tweet with a different time
#KartikPrabhualso again what is the use-case for such a "proof"?
#aaronpkKartikPrabhu: well the trick on twitter is to set an account to private, write multiple tweets with different outcomes, then delete all but the desired tweet and make the account public
#aaronpki can't remember off-hand but i have definitely seen examples of people referencing old tweets to make a point about when something was claimed
#KartikPrabhualso I write posts with a futured publish date which counts as a draft and people with the URL can still reply to it even though it isn't published yet!
#amz3`KartikPrabhu: the use case, is in science for instance, to tell whoever made the discovery first
#KartikPrabhuamz3`: even current publishing does not guarantee that
#amz3`and basicaly, since time can not be trusted, I can not rely on time to create "list of posts"
#KartikPrabhuamz3`: when someone hits publish you automatically use the current time
#KartikPrabhudon't let user select the published time
#amz3`the whole database is shared among participant, i don't control what they put in the database, only that they can't modify old entries
#aaronpkthere are two timestamps to consider when building a /reader ... the time the post self-reports as the published time, and the time the reader found it. if you want to show the user a list of things they haven't seen yet, use the time the reader time. if you want to show a list of things in supposedly chronological order, show the published time
#[kevinmarks]This problem of public timestamping is solved by Bitcoin, but at a very high cost
#aaronpkno, that system just has different tradeoffs
#aaronpkfor example you *can't* backdate things, which sometimes is a thing i want to do
[manton] joined the channel
#[manton]In Micro.blog I use the published date reported by the blog and sort on that. I had planned to do more checking to ensure the dates aren't wildly off, but in practice it hasn't been a problem yet. (Checking that they aren't in the future would solve most problems.)
#aaronpkyeah in practice people don't actually try to mess with timestamps for this stuff
#[manton]This is also related to post editing, which I think has more potential for abuse.
#aaronpki think the most likely error is around timezones. like forgetting to include a timezone offset and using only the local time.
#[manton]Yep. There are several places that timezones can be off in a platform like this.
#mblaneythere's another way to possibly solve the timestamp issue, you could ask a 3rd party to store the timestamp and link to the post you want verified.
#mblaneyif others trust the 3rd party, great. if not, add more 3rd party sites to do the verification.
#mblaneywould work for the whole content of the post too, just store a hash and verify that hasn't changed.
#sknebelreading logs, there is a bunch of existing stuff for timestamping
#sknebele.g. signed executables generally have to have not only a a signature, but only a signed timestamp proving *when* they were signed (which really just is the person creating the binary going to a trusted authority and saying "here is a signature I'm attaching to my file, could you please sign a statement saying when you've seen it", which is then attached to the file as well)
#sknebelcertificate transparency logs have interesting properties in that regard as well (they don't explicitly contain timestamps, but they are logs where you can detect changes to the history)
loicm, jihaisse and [kevinmarks] joined the channel
#Zegnatcweiske, not a lot of feedback on why they do not like linkback though :/
#rhiaropetermolnar: aleph indexes documents like pdfs, emails, spreadsheets, and provides a frontend for sorting documents and extracted entities (people, companies, land) into collections, and cross-referencing them against other collections to see if there are overlaps. You could download a static copy of your website and have an instance of aleph ingest it, but.. I don't know why you would.. that's nto what it's for
#Loqirhiaro: petermolnar left you a message 5 minutes ago: is it possible to use aleph as a search engine for our sites? If yes, had anyone done it so far?
#petermolnarI was thinking of feeding a lot of extras beside the text to it, exif data in json, csv from sensors, etc, but that's a completely different use case; thanks :)
#rhiarowhen we want to ingest already structured data sources we have to map them from the existing structure to aleph's ES data model. It's arbitrary, you might as well make your own ES backed thing that's more customised to your use case
#jeremycherfasI saw someone else reading this https://static.land yesterday and thought it might be of interest here, but not sure where in the wiki to put it.
#Zegnat[kevinmarks], maybe because of a bias towards self-contained platforms like Mastodon? IndieWeb doesn’t really show well as a solid network. We’re just people with websites that talk to each other.
#ZegnatIt is interesting SOLID is mentioned on the list there (I haven’t read the whole thing). Are there actual websites implementing any of the SOLID stuff?
j12t joined the channel
#petermolnardecentralized == fragmented variety of random sofwware that can talk to eachother; this is what's missing from 99% of decentralization efforts
#ZegnatI am not completely sure how useful though, [colinwalker], I still doubt at times what word should be applied to what idea ;) But that’s probably just the nature of it
#petermolnar"Back to the Future: The Decentralized Web" - new on AWS!
#Zegnatj4y_funabashi, it is going to be fun to see clients that will actually display old posts as well!
#sl007I mean 5000 people will attend the festival but on the other side there are 38 other workshops and how many will attend ...
#sknebelsl007: people outside the community very likely won't edit the wiki
#Zegnatsl007, I think too few of the active IndieWeb wiki/IRC users can make it :( And journalists actually there are less likely to login to the wiki to add their names
#sknebelsl007: did you have joschi retweet an announcement or something? quite a few people that were at other camps probably don't really check the wiki or anything, but might see it there
#sl007OK, fun fact - meanwhile received a mail "I checked in via sched, do i have to add me to the guest list" - no idea where I can see who "checked in via sched" (which is the festivals system)
#ZegnatDo you have any numbers on how many people have checked in via sched at all? Maybe just add the number to the wiki?
#sl007Zegnat - yeah, just got it - the number is 5 (five)
#Loqipetermolnar has 29 karma in this channel (46 overall)
#Loqi[petermolnar] decentralized == fragmented variety of random sofwware that can talk to eachother; this is what's missing from 99% of decentralization efforts
[miklb], snarfed, gigitux and [manton] joined the channel
#[manton]Do any of the other HWC cities use meetup.com or mailing lists to help coordinate event times, or is mostly just on the wiki and individual blog posts / tweets? Someone asked if there was a list for Austin, so want to make sure what we're doing is consistent with other cities.
#sknebel[manton]: we use meetup.com, because that's the place to be for tech meetups in Berlin (sadly, not a fan of it)
#sknebelgeneral consensus from a HWC organizers session was that the wiki is primarily community-internal documentation and has basically no outreach value for HWC (even if people stumble over it, they then also have to look at HWCs carefully enough to notice there is a local one, ...), to use whatever works locally and that by far the most effective thing is directly contacting/inviting people via e-mail, twitter or in person
#[manton]@sknebel Got it, thank you. I like starting with a mailing list for anyone interested, but meetup.com is popular here too and probably worth looking at. (I don't use it much myself either.)
#sknebelmeetup is annoyingly expensive, but got at least a few people
KartikPrabhu, snarfed, sl007 and [manton] joined the channel
#[manton]jeremycherfas Actually the beta isn't being updated anymore! You can delete it and switch to the App Store version. The App Store version has a bunch of improvements since the beta.
#Loqi[manton]: [jeremycherfas] left you a message 34 minutes ago: No sign of an update the the micro blog app beta.
#[manton](If I had planned things a little better, I would've made the beta automatically notify you about the new version. Sorry about that.)