Loqi[superfeedr] "Been in a dev rut, so to break out going to see how quickly I can go from 0 to live #indieweb site sending/receiving webmentions with @eleven_ty. Since it supports liquid, I can use my work from jekyll-indieweb as a heads start https://github.com/miklb/jekyll-indieweb" by Michael Bishop on 2018-02-09 https://miklb.com/blog/2018/02/09/3409/
[miklb]there’s not a UI for it in the WordPress post-kinds plugin, but I got a reply from Twitter and a reply from micro.blog & wanted to respond in a single reply, if possible.
[miklb]but if they were just comments on my site, I wouldn’t have hesitated since there would be context of both similar replies with different suggestions.
chrisaldrichmiklb, some CMSes do better than others to provide reply contexts, some really do none at all. I'm sure I've done something similar somewhere but I can't find the example now.
chrisaldrichI think I did more context for the better one and then added another smaller context via hand with similar mark up to what Post Kinds has so they looked similar. u-in-reply-to on the second seemed to have done the trick.
chrisaldrichOften I'll write a reply that goes longer than a few paragraphs and usually at that point it always seems better to make the whole thing an article and write a reply to the original with a link to the article. :)
chrisaldrichI've been trying not to do that as much to help make the content a bit more "evergreen", particularly when it's a reply that will likely apply to someone else further down the line.
chrisaldrichLoqi's last notice above was exactly such a "reply" that turned into an article. You'll notice I threw in a line of context and added a u-in-reply-to one of the links to cover the necessitating case.
[gerwitz]I think the tension between “but the silos aren’t crawlable” and “I don’t care about indexers” is ine f my favorite things about this community. (seriously)
tantek, KevinMarks, pindonga, [kevinmarks], yoroy, Pierre-O and snarfed joined the channel
Zegnat[gerwitz], I guess it depends on what you mean with “I don’t care about indexers”. I feel a lot of people are of the mind that they shouldn’t have to do extra work to please any specific indexers, the fact they are publishing accessible (semantic) HTML should suffice. It is then up to indexers to do their job. People like getting indexed though.
petermolnarinteresting point though: I got rid of twitter meta, open graph meta, dublin core meta, etc. a little while ago for two reasons: a, I follow mf2; b, author, description, and keywords, meta should be sufficient for any crawler as basic meta, shouldn't it?
@sl007@OKNRW@derarndt Sicher nicht. Wart ihr beim Campfire Festival? Ich persönlich habe es dort intensiv mit einem IndieWebCamp versucht. Das Festival hatte quasi 0 Besucher, ich aber habe nun 1.000 € Schulden. Seien wir ehrlich, denn ihr schaut ja sicher auch extra3 oder heute show ;) (twitter.com/_/status/961896683943682048)
Zegnatpetermolnar, that’s what I think too. I find it weird how people scramble to support whatever meta tags an indexer dreams up all the time. Indexers (especially search engines) will always implement the semantics used by the majority anyway, otherwise they will fail as an indexer. But that’s just my opinion on the matter.
petermolnarin theory, the correct response to the main request is to serve the json, and to anything with params should be 501 not implemented, and then no one could say it's not following recommendations
ZegnatI was thinking of adding oembed to my blog to enable other people to do reposts. As in: I own the content on my blog and I do not just want people to go republishing it, but I can allow them to embed my content as served by my site if they want to repost.
voxpelli, leg, KevinMarks, deathrow1, snarfed, mbrock, [eddie], friedcell, eli_oat, snarfed1, [gerwitz] and wolftune joined the channel; camerongray_ left the channel
[eddie]Hmmm I’m about to make a private event on Facebook... I’m assuming Bridgy won’t send webmentions for private Facebook event RSVPs, even if the post has the Indie Event url?
[jjdelc]When bridgy scrapes the likes on an IG post, it seems that bridgy also scrapes my blog to find the syndicate-to match and then sends a webmention. but as per protocol, I have to then check that the source page (the Ig post) contains a link to the target (my blog post), but of course there is no link from IG to my post since the post initialized there, so I end up rejecting the mention.
LoqiJust generated this week's newsletter! You still have a few minutes to make changes, and I'll re-generate it 10 minutes before it gets sent out at 3pm Pacific time. https://indieweb.org/this-week/2018-02-09.html
[jjdelc]I see, I should parse those appspot URLs, although when someone clicks on those mentions it'll take them to the unstyled snippet, but that;s alright I suppose
[jjdelc]Ah so the webmention source param is not necessarily the target, but first parse the content of the webmention content and fallback to the source url then
[eddie]Right now it only works if you listen to an audio post in the /Reader. Plans are for if you are listening/watching audio/video posts in the Reader OR if you are on an h-entry page in Safari, and listening to audio or video that is marked up as u-audio/u-video then the Media Fragments will be included