KartikPrabhu, chrisaldrich, snarfed, tantek, electronicmaji and [sdepolo] joined the channel
#[sdepolo]Ben said he’d do it, so let’s take him up on this now and work you in on the next post. We should have much more lead time next slot.
#Loqi[superfeedr] "Been in a dev rut, so to break out going to see how quickly I can go from 0 to live #indieweb site sending/receiving webmentions with @eleven_ty. Since it supports liquid, I can use my work from jekyll-indieweb as a heads start https://github.com/miklb/jekyll-indieweb" by Michael Bishop on 2018-02-09 https://miklb.com/blog/2018/02/09/3409/
#[miklb]there’s not a UI for it in the WordPress post-kinds plugin, but I got a reply from Twitter and a reply from micro.blog & wanted to respond in a single reply, if possible.
#[miklb]but still not 100% sure how that would work. If I @-mention both in the reply, there’s no context for the other person
#[miklb]but if they were just comments on my site, I wouldn’t have hesitated since there would be context of both similar replies with different suggestions.
#chrisaldrichmiklb, some CMSes do better than others to provide reply contexts, some really do none at all. I'm sure I've done something similar somewhere but I can't find the example now.
#chrisaldrichI think I did more context for the better one and then added another smaller context via hand with similar mark up to what Post Kinds has so they looked similar. u-in-reply-to on the second seemed to have done the trick.
#[miklb]chrisaldrich it’s also around this time I think about hooking bridgy up to the webmention in comments so could reply to each in nest replies
#GWGMultireply I would do, but I am not motivated to do multi kind
#chrisaldrichIn practice there's typically a way around multi-kind, I've only run against multi-reply once or twice.
#chrisaldrichOften I'll write a reply that goes longer than a few paragraphs and usually at that point it always seems better to make the whole thing an article and write a reply to the original with a link to the article. :)
#GWGchrisaldrich, I have seen you write some very detailed replies.
#chrisaldrichI've been trying not to do that as much to help make the content a bit more "evergreen", particularly when it's a reply that will likely apply to someone else further down the line.
#chrisaldrichLoqi's last notice above was exactly such a "reply" that turned into an article. You'll notice I threw in a line of context and added a u-in-reply-to one of the links to cover the necessitating case.
jihaisse, friedcell, snarfed and [gerwitz] joined the channel
#[gerwitz]I think the tension between “but the silos aren’t crawlable” and “I don’t care about indexers” is ine f my favorite things about this community. (seriously)
tantek, KevinMarks, pindonga, [kevinmarks], yoroy, Pierre-O and snarfed joined the channel
#Zegnat[gerwitz], I guess it depends on what you mean with “I don’t care about indexers”. I feel a lot of people are of the mind that they shouldn’t have to do extra work to please any specific indexers, the fact they are publishing accessible (semantic) HTML should suffice. It is then up to indexers to do their job. People like getting indexed though.
jeremycherfas joined the channel
#petermolnarinteresting point though: I got rid of twitter meta, open graph meta, dublin core meta, etc. a little while ago for two reasons: a, I follow mf2; b, author, description, and keywords, meta should be sufficient for any crawler as basic meta, shouldn't it?
friedcell joined the channel
#@sl007@OKNRW@derarndt Sicher nicht. Wart ihr beim Campfire Festival? Ich persönlich habe es dort intensiv mit einem IndieWebCamp versucht. Das Festival hatte quasi 0 Besucher, ich aber habe nun 1.000 € Schulden. Seien wir ehrlich, denn ihr schaut ja sicher auch extra3 oder heute show ;) (twitter.com/_/status/961896683943682048)
#Zegnatpetermolnar, that’s what I think too. I find it weird how people scramble to support whatever meta tags an indexer dreams up all the time. Indexers (especially search engines) will always implement the semantics used by the majority anyway, otherwise they will fail as an indexer. But that’s just my opinion on the matter.
#petermolnarin theory, the correct response to the main request is to serve the json, and to anything with params should be 501 not implemented, and then no one could say it's not following recommendations
#[kevinmarks]Insofar as sites support it, they cope with varying sizes.
snarfed joined the channel
#[kevinmarks]Does anything other than slack still use oembed?
#ZegnatI was thinking of adding oembed to my blog to enable other people to do reposts. As in: I own the content on my blog and I do not just want people to go republishing it, but I can allow them to embed my content as served by my site if they want to repost.
voxpelli, leg, KevinMarks, deathrow1, snarfed, mbrock, [eddie], friedcell, eli_oat, snarfed1, [gerwitz] and wolftune joined the channel; camerongray_ left the channel
#[eddie]Hmmm I’m about to make a private event on Facebook... I’m assuming Bridgy won’t send webmentions for private Facebook event RSVPs, even if the post has the Indie Event url?
#aaronpkalright got those bugs sorted out. as far as I know now, ownyourgram should be back to normal
#aaronpkso please report any more issues if you encounter them :)
[jjdelc] joined the channel
#[jjdelc]hello, I have a question about bridgy and webmentions and pesos.
#[jjdelc]When bridgy scrapes the likes on an IG post, it seems that bridgy also scrapes my blog to find the syndicate-to match and then sends a webmention. but as per protocol, I have to then check that the source page (the Ig post) contains a link to the target (my blog post), but of course there is no link from IG to my post since the post initialized there, so I end up rejecting the mention.
#aaronpkbridgy sends its own URLs as the source URL of the webmention
#LoqiJust generated this week's newsletter! You still have a few minutes to make changes, and I'll re-generate it 10 minutes before it gets sent out at 3pm Pacific time. https://indieweb.org/this-week/2018-02-09.html
#aaronpkwhich is definitely placing some trust in bridgy, since if you let anyone do that, it'd be easy to fake comments from other people
#aaronpkmy site shows "(via brid.gy)" or whatever other domain if the source URL and microformats URL don't match
#[jjdelc]I see, I should parse those appspot URLs, although when someone clicks on those mentions it'll take them to the unstyled snippet, but that;s alright I suppose
#aaronpkbut you should definitely parse the bridgy URLs because that's how you verify the webmention
#[jjdelc]Ah so the webmention source param is not necessarily the target, but first parse the content of the webmention content and fallback to the source url then
#tantek[jjdelc]: you may also be interested in the [#dev] channel! :)
#aaronpkthe webmention source URL is the URL that links to your page. but what that page actually *means* is something different
#Loqi[Eddie Hinkle] Thanks for the shout out! Definitely feel free to let me know if there are any major features it’s missing for your use.
matthewtrask joined the channel
#[eddie]Right now it only works if you listen to an audio post in the /Reader. Plans are for if you are listening/watching audio/video posts in the Reader OR if you are on an h-entry page in Safari, and listening to audio or video that is marked up as u-audio/u-video then the Media Fragments will be included
#[eddie](I also need to add an option for them to be removed in the event that you want to respond to something as a whole)
#tantekdoes Indigenous use media fragments to keep track of where you are in podcast etc and resume there when you re-open it?
snarfed, [kevinmarks] and wolftune joined the channel