2018-09-01 UTC
# 00:07 [keithjgrant] PSA: don't log out of Omnibear tonight. I'm shuffling hosting & DNS around and I'm not entirely sure if logging in will work while the auth page is down
# 00:08 [keithjgrant] (I thought this would take 10 mins tops, but cloudflare apparently set some stupid TTLs)
wolftune, renem, ben_thatmustbeme, AngeloGladding, electronicmaji, eli_oat, eli_oat1 and Thanks joined the channel
# 05:54 miklb_ if I'm linking to someone with an @ in a note and link to their Twitter url is there any mf2 that would be handy to include in that markup?
# 05:57 miklb_ oh. I wonder if I could parse the rel-me from their Twitter handle first to get their home URL. Does that sound doable?
mikedlr28 and [eddie] joined the channel
# 06:41 [eddie] If I were looking for a list of people involved in the IndieWeb any ideas for a good place to look? My first thought was people who have posted to IndieNews. After that, I’m not sure.
[jon] joined the channel
# 06:42 [jon] catching up here … I see that others have already shared the “Diversity on Micro.blog” post. [aaronpk], when we talked at OSBridge you said that there was a desire to do something about Indieweb’s ongoing diversity problems. Has there been any followup to the Indiewebcamp session?
zaratustra25 joined the channel
eli_oat1, dp33, pindonga and eli_oat joined the channel
# 09:02 Zegnat [jon] there was a discussion about it at the Leaders summit aswell (where organisers talk pre-IndieWebCamp). That included discussion on personal outreach, thinking about who you invite to events, and also how future travel assistance can be made more accessible.
catsup, barpthewire, [kevinmarks], _200ok_, calumryan, KevinMarks_, KevinMarks, maxalt16, eli_oat, JulianF[m], decode1, friedcell, grdryn[m], Matthew[m], EricDrechsel[m], mxuribe[m], M0x3F[m], hotzeplotz[m], plindner[m], Salt[m], pniedzielski[m], myfreeweb[m], thrrgilag, ishj1984[m], camb[m], grantcodes[m], wakingrufus[m], wjh[m], zoglesby, eli_oat[m], moredhel_[m], maze[m], cuibonobo[m], dazinism[m], damian11215[m], Viaken[m], strk[m], maze[m]1, jaduncan[m], klandwehr[m], ElMago[m], afrogeek[m] and isgy[m] joined the channel
friedcell, KevinMarks, SolarAquarion29, jgmac1106, berndj2, barpthewire, gigitux, Grimnir17 and electronicmaji joined the channel
snarfed, KevinMarks and [jgmac1106] joined the channel
# 14:07 [jgmac1106] What we did not decide and where there is some disagreement is wether designing for diversity and inclusion should be in the IndieWeb Principles.
KevinMarks joined the channel
[keithjgrant], KevinMarks and KevinMarks_ joined the channel
# 14:32 Loqi GWG has 31 karma in this channel over the last year (156 in all channels)
KartikPrabhu and lucy_ joined the channel
# 14:46 GWG snarfed: All Indieweb community members are welcome. I have a table, a couch, and widfi
KevinMarks, brykr13, yoroy and [jon] joined the channel
# 15:08 [jon] [aaronpk] lots of good ideas have been suggested already:
# 15:08 [jon] 1) commit to prioritizing diversity and inclusion and put it in your principles.
# 15:08 [jon] 3) have some very straightforward instructions about how to set up an Indieweb site using Wordpress (the current instructions on the wiki focus on “generation 2 and 3” users) and Tumblr (NOT starting with “set up your own domain”, because that’s a barrier to many people)
# 15:08 [jon] 2) articulate how Indieweb technology solves specific needs for underserved groups - and build support and tutorials to make it very easy to get aboard. [anomalily] has great points about the zine aspect; Jacky Alciné brought up poet
# 15:08 [jon] 4) redesign the website.
# 15:08 [jon] 5) outreach focused on *listening* to what people from marginalized communities want, rather than on the current perceived selling points
# 15:08 [jon] 6) make it clear what people can do to defend against harassment
# 15:10 [jon] i’m not seeing a meta channel in Slack?
# 15:10 [jon] but, feel free to copy it over
# 15:11 aaronpk it probably doesn't display by default but you can search for it in the channel list
snarfed joined the channel
# 15:19 [keithjgrant] This might tie into that above, but I'm working now on some more beginner-friendly "how to set up micropub" (and indieauth) docs for omnibear.com
barpthewire, wolftune, gigitux, KevinMarks_, KevinMarks, iasai_ and [jgmac1106] joined the channel
# 16:30 [jon] that’s good to hear, [keithjgrant] and [jgmac1106]!
kiith, milkii, zeroed, KevinMarks, KartikPrabhu, treora, skippy, skvist, kapowaz, ramsey, anarchivist, BrAsS_mOnKeY, hiya20, gigitux, submain, yoroy, wolftune, eli_oat1 and leg joined the channel
# 19:18 AngeloGladding so the two person format is great and your and jeena's implementation was as well
# 19:19 Zegnat All credits to Jeena. I just happened to be in Gothenburg and able to show up for a chat :D
# 19:20 AngeloGladding so of your multiple domains do you have a primary domain?
# 19:21 Zegnat For my identity it has been vanderven.se/martijn for years. Everything else is secondary.
# 19:23 AngeloGladding curious, why don't you prefer zegnat.net?
# 19:24 Zegnat I guess it just never stuck with me personally. As you can see on my homepage, I do not actually use zegnat as username a whole lot either.
# 19:25 aaronpk now that I own aaronpk.com (it wasn't available when I started using "aaronpk"), I keep thinking about moving completely to that domain
# 19:26 AngeloGladding in zegnat's case it isn't immediately obvious which of the two is his primary identity
# 19:27 AngeloGladding zegnat.net links to vand.se/.. but not vice versa
# 19:27 AngeloGladding a bi-directional rel=me could punt to the client
# 19:27 Zegnat It does link back, but only to the wiki subdomain and not to the landing page on zegnat.net
# 19:27 Zegnat zegnat.net isn’t actually me though. Its not a profile page. rel-me would be wrong.
barpthewire joined the channel
# 19:28 AngeloGladding and yet here i am refering to you as zegnat
# 19:28 Zegnat I have also been called Zegnat IRL at an IndieWebCamp, IIRC :P
# 19:29 AngeloGladding you are definitely zegnat.net
# 19:30 Zegnat I should really push my nick change through everywhere I guess :P
# 19:31 AngeloGladding aaronpk i'm sure i've read about it in the wiki but are you aware of immediate negative side-effects to the transition?
# 19:31 aaronpk i'm sure there's some SEO voodoo reasons to think about too
# 19:32 AngeloGladding oh right...
# 19:32 AngeloGladding probably..
# 19:32 Zegnat Transition ... from one domain to another? Anywhere that uses IndieAuth will think you are a new person so configurations wont carry over. Not a big issue for aaronpk probably, as he selfhosts about everything and can just update databases
# 19:33 AngeloGladding have either of you heard of the `alt-svc` header?
# 19:33 AngeloGladding i brought it up earlier
JulianF[m] joined the channel
# 19:33 AngeloGladding it's like rel=me but not
# 19:34 AngeloGladding just in case you didn't click through it just allows you to designate an alternative-service
# 19:34 AngeloGladding one that behaves identically
# 19:36 Zegnat So ... rel-alternate except the alternate link is of the same document type?
# 19:53 AngeloGladding an alternative origin (scheme + host + port) -- my example earlier used it to change the hostname to an .onion -- but in this context it could be used to preempt your domain name transition
# 19:54 AngeloGladding clients operating against aaronparecki.com would be instructed to use aaronpk.com (transparently in the background)
grdryn[m], EricDrechsel[m], pniedzielski[m], Salt[m], mxuribe[m], myfreeweb[m], thrrgilag, jaduncan[m], camb[m], Matthew[m], hotzeplotz[m], M0x3F[m], plindner[m], zoglesby, ishj1984[m], grantcodes[m], wakingrufus[m], moredhel[m]1, maze[m], cuibonobo[m], damian11215[m], maze[m]1, eli_oat[m], dazinism[m], Viaken[m], strk[m], isgy[m], klandwehr[m], afrogeek[m], wjh[m] and ElMago[m] joined the channel
# 19:55 Zegnat Ah. The header didn’t imply transition to me, didn’t express priority or preference. Interesting though!
# 19:56 AngeloGladding what's causing that?
# 19:56 Zegnat Must have dropped out at some point and reconnected now
# 19:57 AngeloGladding the header just says "use this service now if you can"
# 19:57 AngeloGladding service == origin
# 19:57 AngeloGladding and the implication is different for each context
# 19:57 AngeloGladding it's a tool
# 19:57 AngeloGladding not sure how it fits or if it does at all
# 19:58 AngeloGladding it's there
# 19:59 Zegnat I can definitely see a use for it, I am just wondering if transition is it :)
# 19:59 aaronpk may I recommend #indieweb-dev for further discussion of this spec
# 19:59 Zegnat Identity transitions are hard. We aren’t the first to bump into it I would say
# 20:06 AngeloGladding there's a certain anxiety to name selection and the domain name is really the one thing you never own
# 20:06 AngeloGladding it's a pain point
# 20:07 AngeloGladding and if that's the *very* first thing that makes you "in" that in and of itself is a high barrier
# 20:07 AngeloGladding which really goes back to what was being discussed earlier in meta
# 20:09 AngeloGladding so i've been working on a one-click install platform for a while now
# 20:09 AngeloGladding i didn't start with the idea of using Tor
# 20:10 AngeloGladding i had contemplated it but it all smacked too much of the silk road
# 20:10 AngeloGladding which wasn't the primary goal so i put it on the backburner
# 20:11 AngeloGladding it wasn't until someone wanted to "host their indie website on their own computer" where it clicked
# 20:11 AngeloGladding notice not a single mention of "anonymous" in the discussions of Tor so far
# 20:11 AngeloGladding or heck even of "privacy"
# 20:12 AngeloGladding from a "get it online" perspective there are unique characteristics
# 20:13 AngeloGladding so i've created a deployment script to deploy my platform to various endpoints -- the cloud (for backbone connectivity) and the local machine (for development)
# 20:13 AngeloGladding this was pre-Tor
# 20:13 AngeloGladding once I introduced Tor support and .onions as first class identifiers something magical happened
# 20:14 AngeloGladding my local deployments were literally live
# 20:14 AngeloGladding just as a side-effect
# 20:15 AngeloGladding so now i have this script that essentially generates a private key and hosts content at it
# 20:16 AngeloGladding in my case there's massive complexity that ensues
# 20:17 Zegnat Complexity that is probably better discussed with developers in #indieweb-dev, as aaronpk said :) Lets try keep this channel to the broad aspects of IndieWeb
# 20:17 AngeloGladding i was juust about to say..
# 20:18 AngeloGladding in the simplest case you could provide [jon]'s legion to download the script and run it and be "online"
# 20:19 AngeloGladding i could have spared the anecdote but i feel like i'm trying real hard to shed the masked black hat persona that inherently comes with discussion of Tor
# 20:20 AngeloGladding and i think this is relevant to IndieWeb broadly
# 20:21 AngeloGladding the first barrier to entry is mindboggling huge to the layperson
# 20:21 AngeloGladding i've been in the streets talking to people
# 20:21 AngeloGladding and they're intelligents
# 20:22 AngeloGladding it's actually been friends and friends of friends and i've actually genuinely tried
# 20:23 AngeloGladding the concept of origin is known only to us
# 20:23 AngeloGladding so i *really* don't want to move this to #indieweb-dev if you don't mind
# 20:25 Zegnat It is mostly a jargon thing. This conversation has the potential to spin out quickly, potentially turning “nerdy” (for lack of a better term). This might keep people who just want to discuss their first website or asking their first questions from speaking up here.
# 20:25 Zegnat We as a community try to get better at splitting that stuff up. Though nobody is without fault there and most of us still mess up near daily!
# 20:27 Zegnat There is a lot of good stuff in there though! And I agree that a one-click-go-live solution is probably the future for independence.
# 20:27 Zegnat I think that is something Beaker Browser already does? Lets people create pages on the “decentralised web” right from their browser.
# 20:28 AngeloGladding i know which room i'm in and i'm definitely actively avoiding the plumbing
# 20:28 AngeloGladding basically every *other* social network has a one-click install
# 20:29 AngeloGladding because they *need* it
# 20:29 AngeloGladding the web has already been bootstrapped for us
# 20:30 AngeloGladding and as a result we don't have a one-click
# 20:31 Zegnat We also do not have a one-click because having a one-click for “website” is hard. Whats a website to you? Whats a website to me?
jgee joined the channel
# 20:32 AngeloGladding an .onion with an h-card
# 20:32 AngeloGladding rel=me with twitter
# 20:33 AngeloGladding i mean there's 1000 ways to tackle it but some kind of common denominator should be available
# 20:33 AngeloGladding in my opinion
# 20:33 AngeloGladding like for the maturity of the IW it's almost amazing that we don't
# 20:34 AngeloGladding great questions
# 20:35 AngeloGladding my script works on debian
# 20:35 AngeloGladding here's one other facet to my installer
# 20:36 AngeloGladding it's being designed such that the user can install my software on their own cloud
# 20:36 AngeloGladding Digital Ocean is my current chosen provider
# 20:37 AngeloGladding so you provide the script with an API token and it'll build that debian server for you
# 20:38 AngeloGladding so there's options
# 20:38 AngeloGladding Tor is supported on all operating systems
# 20:38 AngeloGladding the script could be adapted to work on OSX pretty easily i'm sure
# 20:39 aaronpk "script", "debian", "Digital Ocean"... these all sound like #indieweb-dev
# 20:39 AngeloGladding local virtualization is a heavyweight alternative
electronicmaji joined the channel
# 20:39 AngeloGladding app OSX Amazon
# 20:41 Zegnat It isn’t amazing to me that we haven’t defined a common denominator for websites, BTW. There are too many goals for having a webpage to find a common denominator among the content.
# 20:41 AngeloGladding identity.
# 20:42 KartikPrabhu you don't need scripts for that. HTML page with h-card on static hosting works
# 20:42 AngeloGladding what the HECK is "static hosting"?
# 20:43 AngeloGladding and i'm actually serious -- can you eludicate what it means to you?
# 20:43 AngeloGladding you're thinking of a script being run on the backend of a server
# 20:45 AngeloGladding hmm.. let's clarify
# 20:46 AngeloGladding but what is the context?
# 20:46 KartikPrabhu is not even sure what the problem statement is. and as aaronpk said this is getting jargony enough to move to dev channel
# 20:50 AngeloGladding moves to #indieweb-dev
yoroy, zyley24 and friedcell joined the channel