aaronpkdesign << [https://www.webdesignmuseum.org/ Web Design Museum] with over 900 carefully selected and sorted web sites that show web design trends between the years 1995 and 2005
@brianphillipsWe need a name for the fascinating social-media post you see for a tenth of a second before the algorithm scrambles the page and never find again no matter how far down you scroll (twitter.com/_/status/1035675929010262017)
nitot, nitot_, catsup, yoroy, [kevinmarks], gigitux and [jgmac1106] joined the channel
Zegnatjgmac1106, that link to Doug seems interesting. I didn’t know there was a paid plan for social.coop! I wonder how the numbers on that worked and if something like that would be possible for an indieweb sort of thing
ZegnatNo. But there have often been conversations about wether people want to start providing hosting of IndieWeb ready WP/Known setups. Knowing that there might be a structure that could financially support that is interesting.
jgmac1106cool, we are in a greement there…but yeah I think a co-op hosting model could work...using subdomains it would be cheap…if everyone would be getting a domain then you know you are probably starting around $20 US
jgmac1106[zegnat] this semester I am going to add a comment feed and try and see if I can create a quick chat like room…but set up Slack for now…wonder what is the indieweb version of this: https://www.rumbletalk.com/premium/
jgmac1106just think if I added a chat room to my class websites I wouldn’t need to also use Slack, might play with deadsimplechat or look at what aaronpk did..wouldn’t be till next semester so plenty of time to think about it
snarfed, jeremych_ and KevinMarks_ joined the channel
LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "common book" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "common book is ____", a sentence describing the term)
LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "commonplace" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "commonplace is ____", a sentence describing the term)
LoqiA Commonplace book (or commonplaces) are a way to compile and store knowledge, usually by writing information into books, notebooks, card catalogs, or in more modern settings on one's own website https://indieweb.org/commonplace_book
@jdp23Really disappointing dynamics in the #indieweb chatroom today. I pointed out to a community leader that he was using anti-trans language and he continued to do so. (twitter.com/_/status/1036294860599246848)
[jon]Tantek characterized the anti-WilW behavior on Mastodon as a “toxic mob”. I said that it was community defense by trans people. He continued to describe it that way and I explicitly said “you started out this conversation by characterizing trans people’s methods you disagree about as a “toxic mob”“. And he’s still using the term “toxic mob”.
[tantek]I don’t like the way an apparent “mob” (no idea of their identities) replying to one individual were able to harass that person off not just one Mastodon instance but any instance.
[tantek]I think that’s a dark path and shows a way to abuse mastodon that’s particularly worrisome for folks less privileged and more vulnerable than a celebrity
miklb_my take is that any group of people can be a toxic mob and that it's not "anti-trans language" but a general characterization. WIth more context it sounds like you felt attacked after pointing out you didn't like that characterization. That should be addressed.
[kevinmarks]There is also a some/all going going on here on both sides of the argument. Tantek is saying that he saw a lot of hostile posting about wheaton and saying that it looked like a mob to him. Jon is saying that a lot of people criticising wheaton were trans and has legitimate reasons for doing so.
AngeloGladdingtrust/authenticity of digital identities is *the* software problem of our time. humans can't be tasked with it. humans should manage their *own* software that is tasked with the job.
[kevinmarks]Tantek characterised wheaton's opponents as a toxic mob. Jon said thet were trans people defending their community. Each of these can be true, even if there is no overlap between them. When there is, its even harder to unpick.
miklb_I do not disagree with that. But I believe strongly in codes of conduct, so when a serious allegation is made about the community, then I think it should be discussed and resolution found.
Loqi[Jon Pincus] @bgcarlisle @Sargoth @creatrixtiara @polymerwitch @forktogether @anildash @darius @Are0h
@Annalee would love your perspectives on this ...
petermolnar(btw today I realized Mastodon is what buddycloud and movim.eu should have been; they are basically the same thing, except those two put mastodon capabilities on top of XMPP and it never took off. Too early.)
aaronpki've been thinking about vouch now that i'm following a bunch of mastodon accounts. I often see some people repost stuff from people I don't know, which is great for finding new people, and then I often "favorite" the reposted thing. this means essentially I have created a link from my site to someone's post where the only thing I know about them is the one post I saw. this could be a danger if the rest of
petermolnar[jon]: "somebody who had a history of causing harm" that is not a good enough reason. Ever. Unless that harm is happening/actively happened, this is like punishing someone for past crimes once they moved countries. I'm genuinely curious what actually happened on fediverse level - Twitter should not have been the reason to act.
petermolnar"summing up a recent trend where popularity that comes via the Internet can be quickly washed away by discovering something troubling in a person's past" - that's... that's wrong. Right to be forgotten, anyone?
vilhalmerthough I think the meaning has drifted, originally it only applied to someone who is currently actively bad, not someone who had done literally one problematic thing ever
AngeloGladdingAnchakor imo the primary tech failures in the Wheaton/Mastodon debate were an overburdened central administrator and low fidelity shared blocklist -- decentralization obviates the administrator and empowers first-class blocking tools -- ownership of identity lays the foundation for a trust system -- a mastodon account is a temporary space for groupthink so you can't even begin to implement an honest trust
jgmac1106great post [jon] going to use it as we make the case for designing for diversity and inclusion as an explicit princple. One thing to note all chatrooms are archived and considered “on record” except #chat while bias language isn’t allowed there either the expectations of community members is that nothing is quoted or shared from there
jgmac1106also let us know if you found the ways to use our CoC not helpful, we would rather try our internal systems before resorting to broadcast methods as default…If there are parts you found unclear let us know
AngeloGladding, kiith and [tantek] joined the channel
[tantek][jgmac1106] just one thing - I think you meant “harassing language” not “bias language” (hard for anyone to avoid bias completely, see Wikipedia articles on various forms of bias, note “bias” is not in CoC AFAIK)
@martijnvdven↩️ This is something that has been discussed on and off over in the #indieweb community. One of the ideas being worked on are “vouches”. Where someone interacting with you shows you someone else you know has interacted with them before. A distilled web-of-trust. (twitter.com/_/status/1036381652564500480)
@martijnvdven↩️ That said, for more centralised communities (like the #indieweb chats or the Mastodon code repository) moderation is key! And I for one would love to talk more about that specifically in relation to public Slacks/Discords/IRC! (twitter.com/_/status/1036381738640007174)