snarfed, [eddie], KartikPrabhu, iasai, electronicmaji, [tantek], sl007, tbbrown, wolftune, petermolnar, rEnr3n, jjuran, danbee and mcepl joined the channel; rEnr3n[m] left the channel
#kisik21do I need to be able to search peopletags on my site? I usually provide /tags/tag for #hashtags, do I need to do that for #@peopletags?
friedcell, catsup and [jgmac1106] joined the channel
#[jgmac1106]this might be -dev but you could use rel links for people tags. Or add a p-category but it seems redundant if each person is an h-card...possible group people by p-category. I do that now
catsup, [pfefferle] and [kevinmarks] joined the channel
#[jgmac1106]ahhh can't link to search results: just search for your name
cjwillcock1, mariam0, eduardm, iasai, agentofuser[m], nelsonhb, eli_oat, [Marco], tglobe and [eddie] joined the channel
#[eddie]Hmm I have personally thought about “person-tag” pages lately. Facebook allows you to show the “relationship page” between two people and it shows all the common posts between them
#[eddie]I’ve thought it would be nice to be able to do the same thing
#[eddie]Mostly for my benefit but it could be useful for others too
#ZegnatIf we’re talking public posts, I am not sure what the reason is for keeping that page secret. Useful or not.
#ZegnatI just meant it as in: if you are building it for your own benefit, there is no reason to make it only viewable by yourself :)
#[eddie]Yeah, I feel like public posts should probably be fine. The only thing where I start to wonder is if I am checking in places and tagging who is with me
[jgmac1106] joined the channel
#[jgmac1106]Didn't [sebsel] kind of handle this with his 2 degree s away of likes graph
#[eddie]Currently you could find that post if you know where to look on my site, but a relationship page would potentially show every public checkin of where you and that person have been
#[eddie]Although I do think it would also be useful to allow a person to authenticate the page with IndieAuth (or AutoAuth) and see all the private posts as well
#[jgmac1106]I want to add a simple counter one day to my follower page just not in number of replies, mentions, likes from each person with a two way follow relarionship
#[jgmac1106]Yeah mainly bc I get too many mentions on Twitter my generic mention page becomes a mess... I leave ton unapproved
friedcell joined the channel
#[jgmac1106]Wrote up basic CSS prototype with a hover effect so go over avatar see strength of our connection
#[eddie]Seems like a situation where an “accepted connection” list would come in handy. Anyone you’ve allowed a response from or follow could be displayed automatically
nitot joined the channel; friedcell left the channel
#[jgmac1106]You sign in with Indieauth choose what gets scraped
#[eddie]Yeah, but would you be possible to opt in to say mentions in text and articles but not checkins? I feel like that’s a different level than... ohh okay. Yeah choosing what types of posts get scraped would work
#[jgmac1106]Writing in my next grant. My #IndieWeb web as your LMS needs it
iasai and [kevinmarks] joined the channel
#[kevinmarks]HWC London starts later than I expected
#LoqiA person tag (AKA people tag) is a person mention that is also a tag on a post that refers to a specific person by URL rather than just a word or phrase, and is done as an explicit tagging action by the user, beyond just mentioning a person via hyperlink / h-card / or @-name, autocompleted or not https://indieweb.org/person-tag
#[eddie]You could do it like that, you could also take inspiration from Facebook and show any webmentions that the person has sent to you (so it would show both all the stuff you have sent to that person and all the stuff that person has sent to you)
#[eddie]That would obviously make it a little more than "just a person tag page", because a webmention from that person isn't a person tag. I would probably approach it more like an interactions page with all interactions with a person, person tags being one type of interaction
#[tantek]I think both could be useful, and they're different
#[tantek]I like the Flickr version because it is very simple, direct, clear what it is doing
#alexmingoiaI come across mf2 feeds that have things like checkins, bookmarks, or replies but don't include any of the content, just a URL. Should readers/microsub servers be crawling those references to pull in the additional data? For example, a feed with a post that has u-bookmark-of that's just a URL. No title, no content, no author info. But on the permalink page of the post they include all that.
#alexmingoiaA good example of this is https://vincentp.me/, his home feed has things like checkins but most of the content is on the individual post pages.
#snarfedalexmingoia: microsub doesn't dictate presentation, so readers can do whatever they want, but that sounds like a good idea
#[eddie]I believe the long term goal is for Microsub servers to provide the context of things like bookmarks and replies, but since they are still in the early stages, they don't yet
#alexmingoiaIt's a lot of extra work for consumers. It'd be really convenient if there was a just a single firehouse JSON feed of everything, from a technical perspective.
#alexmingoiaOr at least a proposed standard for identifying a firehouse feed.
iasai, nitot, wolftune, gRegorLove and leg joined the channel
#[eddie]!tell tantek I documented differences between an interactions page and a person tag page on the wiki. Feel free to add any further thoughts you have on those pages
#[tantek]!tell eddie WDYT of Flickr's terminology "Photos of" as compared to "person tag page"? They're not quite the same obv (just photos vs all posts), yet the former feels more accessible / understandable.
#Loqi[tantek]: [eddie] left you a message 14 minutes ago: I documented differences between an interactions page and a person tag page on the wiki. Feel free to add any further thoughts you have on those pages
#[eddie]Yeah that's tough, because I feel like Photos of is accurate for Flickr but not other potential use cases. Person tag page isn't the best, but I'm wondering if there is a third more accessible and accurate page
#[eddie]That said, I'm fine if someone wants to move or rename the page, just wanted to make sure we got the info down 😄
#Loqi[eddie]: [tantek] left you a message 1 minute ago: WDYT of Flickr's terminology "Photos of" as compared to "person tag page"? They're not quite the same obv (just photos vs all posts), yet the former feels more accessible / understandable.
#Loqi[eddie]: [tantek] left you a message 1 minute ago: WDYT of Flickr's terminology "Photos of" as compared to "person tag page"? They're not quite the same obv (just photos vs all posts), yet the former feels more accessible / understandable.
[jgmac1106], [eddie], Anchakor_, johannh_, emceeaich_, isgy[m]1, klandwehr[m]1, eli_oat[m]1, Gregor[m]1, plindner[m]1, grantcodes[m], klez_, JulianF_, daf2, ishj1984[m], echarlie, electronicmaji and Ruxton joined the channel
#[eddie]Yeah, photo of can totally be a thing. Absolutely no contest about that. But it can’t define what I’m doing because I’m working with more than just photos.
#Loqi[eddie]: [tantek] left you a message 22 minutes ago: at least Flickr and FB support a "Photos of" view/page
#[eddie]Really what I’m doing can be found on the interactions page. I have no issue if you want to rename the person tag page to photos of or some similar term. I don’t think they are technically equivalent, but it’s not a big deal until someone builds one
Erkan_Yilmaz, electronicmaji, snarfed, [schmarty] and XgF joined the channel
#[tantek]"with" or interactions are overlapping but different from "photos of"
wolftune, [kevinmarks], snarfed1 and snarfed joined the channel
#[kevinmarks]Is this rel=met or can the with be virtual?