ZegnatI’d be a little careful with the selection. Not everyone may want you to republish their content (both based on expectation, but also copyright).
[aaronpk]I keep going back and forth on whether the full posts should be displayed. For long articles I can see an advantage to showing only a part of them, but it's hard to truncate or summarize a short post of <200 characters, so I'm not sure what the right answer is. Maybe I should just do it like indienews and only show the name of the article but include full note text
ingoogniout of courtesy to the original author I would truncate to the first two paragraphs and then point to the origin, when dealing with long articles.
[jgmac1106]It is still good practice, use a p-summary in your long form so you as author control how your post get truncated (if readers used p-summary)
[jgmac1106]it really stinks on Known or WP if I use a feature image, often the licensing information gets picked up as "start of each post" need to include rules to ignore <small> or <figcaption>
ingoognifolding sections of articles is tricky, readers don't expect it as the least of them are used to write / think in outlines where you can just fold complete sections that are of no interest.
[jgmac1106]In my dream world a reader would show the u-featured image and the p-summary I include followed by "read more" if "p-summary" not there the entire gets displayed. Then I would not have to worry about <small>and <figcaption> getting included
aaronpkinteresting, I just noticed that jeremycherfas' post on stream.indieweb.org is already truncated and has a link "more this way" to the full post on his site
aaronpkthat happened because his list view on https://www.jeremycherfas.net/blog doesn't include the full post text, and stream.indieweb.org doesn't go fetch the full permalink
ingoogniregarding summarize and lede, the New York Times does this very nice in their RSS. There is no exact duplicate in the RSS and the actual article
aaronpkalright, stream.indieweb.org is updated to show only the name and summary for articles. no automated summarizing, just using the authored summary if present
aaronpkit's a bunch of sites I entered, but only posts matching "indieweb" or a few related terms. it's all automatic other than the list of sites I gave it
Zegnatingoogni: I can confirm that not only New York Times does that. Our journalists can write blurbs of several lengths in the editor for their articles, that will be used in different contexts.
jeremycherfasMy stream of blog posts always shows a summary, which is usually the first paragraph with a manually inserted break. If I don't insert a break, I think it truncates at 300 characters. Can't remember.
jeremycherfas!tell ingoogni You mean you want an anchor to the rest of the post? Fair enough, but a lot of people have told me they just click on the link, and in any case it is usually only one or two paragraphs. Not too much.
[aaronpk]With the exception of really long/ugly links like Dropbox or google docs, I'd rather link directly to the real link online, so the main use of a url shortener for me now is for the offline use case of writing down URLs on slides or on paper
snarfed, wolftune and [davidmead] joined the channel
[davidmead][Rose] In my WP instance I used a link shortener to resolve to djm.click, but I couldn’t use that in Known. That shortener is happening either in Known or Twitter (I don’t really know)
[Rose]I just want to have short URLs for sharing with people verbally or for when I need to write things down. (This is thanks to Saturday's URL session!)
Loqishortlink is the use of a short-domain to create a link that redirects to (often much) longer link, popularized on Twitter, and used in permashortlinks for indieweb POSSEing https://indieweb.org/shortlink
[frank], [calumryan], wolftune and snarfed joined the channel