[Chris_Ede]I’ve got a domain & some hosting which uses cpanel, so I can easily spin up a Wordpress blog, but it’s usually overkill for what I want. Found micro.blog, is it good? Is there anything better I should use instead?
chrisaldrichmicro.blog is a good inexpensive managed solution if you don't want to have to manage something yourself, but it also means you can't do as much tinkering.
[Chris_Ede]I’m not looking for the full blogging experience, just somewhere to throw random bits of life into the void, should someone want to look me up
sebselMicro.blog actually also gives you the commenting and some discovery and a place for you to read stuff. In that regard it’s more a platform too, and it sounds like it has more than you need, but still: you can use it as such.
sebselIf you’re a bit more technical there are options with static site generators, hosted on platforms like Netlify, but personally I feel like there is admin tax involved there too, but at the time of writing posts
[Chris_Ede]Yeah I’ve tinkered with Wordpress, but it’s a bit beyond me tbh. Great for the stability etc, but if I screw something up I generally just wipe it and start over. haha
sebselyou can just give micro.blog a try! would mean to give up your cpanel-based hosting, for Micro.blog provides hosting for you (you pay for that there), but it’s sad to be easy to get your data out again if you want something else after all
LoqiMicro.blog is a website and social service started by Manton Reece, which natively supports IndieWeb building-blocks like microformats2, Webmention, and Micropub https://indieweb.org/Micro.blog
[jeremycherfas]Welcome [Chris_Ede] I know I’m late to the party, but if you do go for WP make sure you start with a good Indieweb theme, like Autonomie, and try to note pain points so the wiki on boarding can be improved.
jeremych_, fauno, gRegorLove, fauno_, mapkyca, catsup, Akshay[m]1, cesarosum[m], Mikaela|XMPP and [infominer] joined the channel
Loqi[tonz] has 11 karma in this channel over the last year (27 in all channels)
mauz555, leg, fauno, chris[m]17, ejw, nekr0z, [jgmac1106], [aaronpk], nekr0z_, [tmiller], [fluffy], [Vanessa], [Jamey_Sharp], [tantek], tbbrown, gRegorLove, KempfCreative, [gRegorLove], jeremych_, [grantcodes], [schmarty] and [snarfed] joined the channel; leg left the channel
[jeanmacdonald]Any tips for getting audio on zoom? My Zoom app says Audio is connected but I don’t hear anything. I’m in IndieWeb 101 and see gRegor's presentation.
[jeanmacdonald]I would like to ask [gRegorLove] if there is a chance he has the audio muted, but I don't see an option for that in this Zoom meeting--no chat available? If someone figures it out, please let me know. I really wanted to be in this room! Going over to David's room for now...
jmacMy changing my website's URL from http:// to https:// a few weeks ago means that I can't make a new webmention out of an older page that links to my site, right?
jmacIt's not a big deal, but I do say "aw, rats" when I find a new-to-me link to a Fogknife article via http://, and my extremely proper webmention receiver refuses to recognize that URL
[snarfed]"The receiver SHOULD use per-media-type rules to determine whether the source document mentions the target URL. For example, in an [ HTML5] document, the receiver should look for <a href="*">, <img src="*">, <video src="*"> and other similar links."
KartikPrabhu, gRegorLove, fauno, [Andi], j12t, [fluffy], [Jamey_Sharp], eli_oat, [jgmac1106], jbove, wolftune and wagle joined the channel; patterson left the channel
Loqialt is a required attribute of the <img> element and should be provided in any use of images on indieweb pages from photo posts to featured and other images in articles https://indieweb.org/alt
[tantek]alt << Suggestion for how to write alt text: how would you describe the photo to someone on the phone (who already knows about the context of the earlier material on the page) ?
Loqiok, I added "Suggestion for how to write alt text: how would you describe the photo to someone on the phone (who already knows about the context of the earlier material on the page) ?" to the "See Also" section of /althttps://indieweb.org/wiki/index.php?diff=63084&oldid=61966
[tantek]I have a very good discussion with [schmarty] about the desire to *edit* the /reply-context (e.g. /link-preview) of a /reply post before publishing it to one's site.
[tantek]Like editing down the content of the original post that is displayed, e.g. ellipsing it, perhaps even pruning the start of it, editing the name of the author (which if it came from Twitter may be their name plus a bunch of random current event related stuff, or pronouns etc.), perhaps even editing (or removing!) the author icon, for whatever reason
[tantek]The desire to edit the /reply-context in a reply posting UI leads to interesting storage implications for what such a UI has to do under the covers, since by virtue of being editable, assuming you (the user) do edit it, that edited version must be saved similar to anything else you would write or edit
ZegnatYep. The card will now only ever show the meta data that is part of the page. So you can’t link to pages about one thing and make it look like it is about something else.
Nuggit_@jmac this is how I got around `composer install` refusing to install because of php version. Feels wrong, but composer really thought I didn't have the right version of php and I did, so fooling it using this config bit was what I had to do and it worked, so...! https://stackoverflow.com/questions/26165101/skip-composer-php-requirement