#indieweb 2019-10-08
2019-10-08 UTC
kensp, IPFSFanDiscord[m, wolftune, t-mo, imsky, KempfCreative1, distopico, [dmitshur] and [tantek] joined the channel
gRegorLove, patterson, kensp, KempfCreative, wolftune, [Lewis_Cowles], mblaney, gxt, gareppa, cweiske, krychu, jihaisse, [tonz], AkyRhO_ and jeremych_ joined the channel
# jeremycherfas Good morning IndieWeb
jeremych_, quite, [jgmac1106], deathrow1, jihaisse, gareppa, UsamaIrfanDiscor, imsky, krychu, golevka6489, [tantek], [aaronpk], [Lewis_Cowles], Tyson_911, akierig, dougbeal|iOS, dougbeal|, wolftune, gRegorLove and [snarfed] joined the channel; Tyson_911 left the channel
akierig_ joined the channel
# Amgine_[m] Standards are good. Activity pub/WebSub or whatever it is W3C is calling it today.
# Amgine_[m] It is, since that is the fediverse.
[bdesham] joined the channel
# [snarfed] Amgine: i'm very familiar with AP. i built https://fed.brid.gy/ 😁. i'm asking about how we want to encourage the indieweb to interact with the fediverse from a _UX_ perspective, not plumbing
[schmarty] joined the channel
# [schmarty] snarfed: i think each approach will appeal to some people but not others. "my site is my site" doesn't (easily) allow any AP-only interactions, for example.
akierig joined the channel
# cambridgeport90[ I'm going to have to look at all the stuff later. I haven't been is on par with you guys today as I should.
# [schmarty] by "AP-only interactions" i meant in the case where i may want to do things that e.g. mastodon people following me see but that doesn't appear on my site.
# [schmarty] basically i mean the POSSE-to-a-masto-account case allows for "compartmentalizing" interactions more easily than a federate-my-site
wolftune and [jgmac1106] joined the channel
# [jgmac1106] until there is webmention support federating just comes out weird, deleted anyone I follow on mastadon from micro.blog because replying to the post does noting to keep the thread together
gxt joined the channel
akierig_ joined the channel
# [jgmac1106] separate little worlds all with their separate little laws. I just want to see a reply in my feed, reply to that post, have the reply on my site and then in whatever AP silo...kinda just not using Mastodon anymore cuz it won't work with my site
# [jgmac1106] the blogging platforms like write.as that are built AP first will be interesting spaces to watch
akierig joined the channel
# Amgine_[m] ^that, for me.
# [jgmac1106] though i couldn't help someone edit a header or a footer on write.as so I lost interest quick
# cambridgeport90[ Indeed they will. I've been
akieri___ joined the channel
# [jgmac1106] to get to Mastodon now I syndicate to micro.blog (wish it was through micropub integration) and that in turn shares with the federated version of my micro.blog site
# [jgmac1106] ...just find too many ways the conversation can bifurcate...now I have different threads on micro.blog which I get through webmentions but any conversation on Mastodon has to happen there
# [jgmac1106] or more likely I have no idea what I am doing syndication across multipel silos gets messy
akierig, akierig_, kensp, gareppa, AutoAIDiscord[m] and [Rose] joined the channel
# [Rose] My problem with “I am my own instance with ActivityPub” is then I am an island. How do people discover me? (There’s also something with WordPress where your username is also your handle which I would love to change but that’s another problem). It feels like it’s rather isolating in many ways.
# Amgine_[m] relay.domain.tld <- a mastodon attempt at solution.
[fluffy] joined the channel
# cambridgeport90[ You have to find your niche, I’ve noticed.
# Amgine_[m] There is a mastodon fork, hometown, which focuses on building small local communities with another level of visibility - only visible locally.
# Amgine_[m] Agreed. I wonder how Zap does it?
[tantek] and [KevinMarks] joined the channel
# [KevinMarks] Mastodon actively removing standards support is an argument for treating it like a silo
# [KevinMarks] Websub and atom
# [schmarty] a few pretty interesting removal PRs in there
# [KevinMarks] They kept the crappy part and deleted the useful ones
# [KevinMarks] Noöne will miss salmon, but losing websub is a shame
# [Rose] I believe Overcast has some smart logic built in, it knows approximately when new episodes drop and polls more frequently around then until the new episode is there and regularly the rest of the time. Also the more listeners it has the more it checks. That’s my observation from one podcast where I see those stats on the server though
# [KevinMarks] They make a huge fuss about how hard it is to deal with highly followed accounts with activitypub, but glibly delete websub
# cambridgeport90[ Why is that familiar? podcasting, is it not?
# [KevinMarks] They finally have an account migration story, but it still doesn't use 301 but some magic proprietary refollow event that they throttle
# benharri i think pocket casts does something similar
# [KevinMarks] Hm what is I join the new instance and then migrate it back to mine?
gareppa and wolftune joined the channel
# [Rose] The decision on this issue for Mastodon seems rather negative: https://github.com/tootsuite/mastodon/issues/6074
patterson joined the channel
# [schmarty] ☑ Features
hays_ joined the channel
Parsifal joined the channel
# gRegorLove ☐ ???
# gRegorLove ☐ Profit!
# gRegorLove Cats should be in that list somewhere too
gareppa joined the channel
# dougbeal it lives! https://🌲.dougbeal.com or https://hwc.dougbeal.com
# gRegorLove dougbeal++ nice!
hays_, patterson and [David_Bryant] joined the channel
# [David_Bryant] :thumbsup:
jbove, hays_ and [jgmac1106] joined the channel
# [jgmac1106] hearing WordPress adopt a"benevolent dictator for life" model was major reason I decided not to use WP, just not the kind of open source I wanna do
# [jgmac1106] I like the term building blocks and not "features" for this reason, you still have to decide what blocks you want to use. Products have features the web has open standards folks mold into building blocks
# [tantek] not saying we couldn't do that, but as of right now, /building_blocks is technical, not user-focused
# [jgmac1106] yes I am saying someone might use building blocks to build features in their websites or tools
# [jgmac1106] true
wolftune joined the channel
# [tantek] In thinking more about pathways to onboard folks more easily towards indieweb(-like) solutions and approaches, I'm wondering more about low friction options that may be limited (yet solve a person's particular use-case), however allow for migration to more full featured solutions when (if) a person decides they want more
# [jgmac1106] So far between summit and now NYC the them from html5 and thrown up on githubpages, add h-card been best
# [jgmac1106] that still requires prerequisite skills
# [jgmac1106] no my apologies didn't mean to
# [jgmac1106] the one that works for you, can't think in terms of best, only better, local contects shift too much for a best solution
# [jgmac1106] I think micro.blog gets closet and manton working on domain registration
# [jgmac1106] that will make it truly turn key
# [jgmac1106] I am really hoping your WP talk has impact and tumblr becomes WP IndieWeb playground
# [jgmac1106] tumblr has much the same vibne with post types
# [jgmac1106] ..I can dream
# [jgmac1106] but true I don't know but I try new stuff all the time
# [jgmac1106] that would fit as squarespace and wix don't fit for me bc data export
# [jgmac1106] No WP onboarding works
# [jgmac1106] I would say Google sites but haven't seen what takeout looks like, and not so much blogging, and no real HTM:L which annoys me as generations kids taught to build first on Google Sites
# [jgmac1106] still then say micro.blog
# [snarfed] we currently advocate micro.blog as the easiest way on https://indieweb.org/web_hosting#Custom_domain_silos . wordpress.com is probably just as easy, if not easier, but it's meaningfully less indieweb
# [jgmac1106] It is a Ghost blog but it's one button install and domain is easier to get using Glitch now
[grantcodes] joined the channel
# [grantcodes] What they said ^^^
# [jgmac1106] aaronpk++ for testing
# [grantcodes] Was also going to say ghost is a more direct medium comparison
# cambridgeport90[ Right, but
# [grantcodes] But unlikely to get much indieweb building blocks
# [jgmac1106] Known was this when it was one click install and automatic updates through shared host
# [grantcodes] Import export is hightighted as a feature: https://ghost.org/feature-index/ so probably as good as anything else
# [snarfed] ([tantek] re long form on micro.blog https://help.micro.blog/2018/writing-longer-posts/ . i have no firsthand experience though.)
# [jgmac1106] thanks to [benatwork] Medium export very IndieWeb friendly
[benatwork] joined the channel
# [benatwork] I am actually alarmed that this is the case three years later - I've got to assume it means nobody is really maintaining that code
# [benatwork] True enough - and Medium hasn't really changed since then
# [benatwork] I bet it's actually that I wrote tests that check for mf2 and everybody is too lazy to change them
# [benatwork] ennui through robust testing - that's my secret
gyanrosling joined the channel
# [jgmac1106] adding a custom domain in blogger still pretty straightforward
KempfCreative joined the channel
# [jgmac1106] aaronpk you mean wait the 2-48 hours on a change?
kensp and wolftune joined the channel
# [jgmac1106] shared host + WP install is a good approach for a medium export imo, often the most economical approach if price point a concern
[fluffy] joined the channel
# [jgmac1106] I am assuming they want a url and blog. Not assuming they want anything more
# [jgmac1106] If they want to try all the IndieWeb extras I wouldn't recommend
# [jgmac1106] True
# [jgmac1106] Write.as Medium like in terms of Design and UI
# [jgmac1106] Don't know about import. Free plans limited
# Loqi write.as is a minimal UI blogging tool meant for quick posting with good pseudonymity https://indieweb.org/write.as
# Loqi WriteFreely is an open-source blogging platform that supports ActivityPub federation and plans to support Micropub in its desktop app and probably web editor too https://indieweb.org/WriteFreely
# [jgmac1106] Thx aaronpk good advice....
[KevinMarks], blassin, imsky, deathrow1 and strugee joined the channel
# [KevinMarks] Blogger is fairly turnkey. Can we make it more medium like with a theme (and bridgy)
# [jgmac1106] No the new themes are nore js than html...closest I got was reverting to classic theme and then using IFTT and bridgy... Could just publish with Bridgy
# [jgmac1106] Could be done but would need help with the CSS... But that's more dev