opal, KartikPrabhu, leg, irisisgay, markopasha, petermolnar, [jgmac1106], jgee, [kimberlyhirsh], anotheryou, loicm, omz13 and [KevinMarks] joined the channel; leg left the channel
#[jgmac1106]yeah, I got webmentions working...yeah plumbing is lightweight but UI clunky to get going
#[jgmac1106]lot of weird xml stuff still hanging around...especially in the blogging tools, I am just playing really wanted a wiki that wasn't mediawiki
cc_ joined the channel
#ZegnatOh, I can totally see webmentions working for my most wiki systems, for sure!
#ZegnatThey are the prime candidate for sending webmentions in my opinion
#[jgmac1106]I am just using Fluffy's scrpit, dokuwiki still uses pingbacks heavily someone smart than me coudl proably fork it. I will put in webmention support ticket every year when they vote on wikimedia priorites before all-hands
markoong joined the channel
#[jgmac1106]the css in dokuwiki old and crusty that is for sure
#jmacI connect to IndieWeb chat with IRCCloud, meself. It's good stuff.
#jmacThere is a robot here, Loqi, that will let you leave messages for people not here at the moment. I don't know the syntax for it but one of the other regulars here might?
#Ryuno-KiThanks. First time I'm here in #indieweb IIRC
#[snarfed]bonkerfield and i worked together for a while a bit ago. he's a great data scientist. if we can tempt him into doing a little of that on anything indieweb, eg indie map or anything else, we'll be lucky!
mauz555, irisisgay, kensp, Diogo, opal, [tantek], jbove, Garbanzo and loicm joined the channel
#jmacMan, what the heck. The article author seemed to think WM was pretty cool, and the snarky editor was like "pff this is garbage" and added that headline i guess? oh well
markong joined the channel
#jmacThat being said: it does reinforce that "Yes but what about the spam" is the #1 question everyone has about WM, and it should be our first question as implementors as well. (Not news to anyone here, just a sober reminder to me.)
#aaronpk"what about spam" is a problem with everything, there is no actual solution
#aaronpkthe reason is because the term "spam" is too vague so it can be repurposed when dismissing any technology
#jmacWell, yes. It unpacks to "How is this going to be useful in an internet full of malefactors" and specifically in this case "How is this not going to just drop down the same chute that Pingbacks did (in the public consciousness)"
#aaronpkand we've addressed those specific criticisms, and IMO webmention is already far more successful than pingback ever was
#jmacI didn't know that much about Pingbacks before getting interested in webmention. When talking to others about it, I learn how much Pingback broke peoples' hearts. It left people feeling really burned
#jmacYeah I agree. I feel confident that WM is designed with reality in mind (per the rest of the main IW techs)
#jmacFWIW a lot of smart-nerd friends are using me as their main information source about this and they really want it to succeed
#jmacI feel that a lot of my excitement for Webmention is irrational and I haven't quite succeeded in putting it into words et
jgee joined the channel
#jmacI am thrilled when I make a post and it makes a thing happen on another website like magic. But how is it better than just making my post and then walking over to that other site and pressing a button to make the thing happen, like everyone else? Uh I dunno
#aaronpkthe reader makes a post on your website, your website sends a webmention to the thing you're commenting on
#aaronpkthe end experience is the same as you get on twitter, but the data lives on each person's own website, the reader is just the tool used to create and read the posts
#jmacYes! That's what I meant... I have yet to really use an IndieWebby reader that can engage in two-way conversation like that.
#jmacIt's funny as I've gotten to sing the praises of Fraidycat, which takes the opposite approach of "following from a distance"
markoong, markong, jgee, [KevinMarks], [LewisCowles], wolftune, pncl and [tantek] joined the channel
#LoqiA social reader is a modern interactive reader that allows you to directly respond to posts (with a like, comment, etc) right there inline with posts as you read them (as people do in social media), in contrast to legacy feed readers which were one-way read-only experiences and provided no mechanisms to interact with or respond to posts https://indieweb.org/social_reader
#[tantek]In general when pitching this stuff, try to avoid any/all mention of jargon/technology/plumbing like webmention, micropub etc.
#[tantek]those are all implementation details only of interest to implementers (not all developers are implementers nor are all those even interested in implementing)