[KevinMarks], [grantcodes] and jjuran joined the channel
#petermolnarthere are many indie/p2p/etc efforts out there - dat/hyperdrive, IPFS, scuttlebutt; etc - maybe a self-hosted activitypub silos, like mastodon, diaspora, etc fall under this category as well. Thinking about it, they could be, from our perspective, thought of, as indie "silos", meaning there could (should?) be ways to POSSE/PESOS to/from them. (I know brid.gy has an engine for mastodon). I'm curious about thoughts on this topic.
swentel, KartikPrabhu, omz13_, jacky-, kiryin, wagle, kensp and [Steen_Comer] joined the channel
#[Steen_Comer]Hey all. I’m a writer interested in indieweb and related open technologies. I’m finally getting around to writing a post on convincing folks to use RSS, and while going through my notes found this chat, and thought I should see what it was like.
#[Steen_Comer][chrisaldrich] I think it was via your article on Webmentions that I found this, so thanks for that.
#[KevinMarks]Hi Steen, do you have your own website?
#[Steen_Comer]I literally just pushed that out via blot, I’m experimenting with Quoteback for the first time, and I see that is not clear.
#[Steen_Comer]That blog is a relatively new thing for me. I’ve been mostly working in newsletter form recently
#[Steen_Comer]And I need to fix the links on the main page so that it is more clear that the archive is on tinyletter, not buttondown, as I’ve just moved there. It’s here, if you care to look https://tinyletter.com/mediapathic/archive
seekr and [LewisCowles] joined the channel
#[Steen_Comer]And I came in around 3am local, and it’s time to go to bed. I’ve mostly just come to idle and see what the current state of things is. I’m sure I’ll be dropping in to ask questions from time to time.
#[jgmac1106]it is color coded because this was long before revision history
#[jgmac1106]I still do a lot of download through html and then run through tidy html to put on websites....google changes all the urls to run their security though...you have to fix every one
#[jgmac1106]....nobody does revision history better......you open the history of wikimedia versus gDocs...way easier o see who made what edit when....
#petermolnar"I run a restaurant in Cambridge. Here's why we won't be reopening on 4 July" - because my staff is happier furloughed till August? snarky, but potentially true, or somewhat true.
#petermolnaroh, sorry, this really is -chat, please don't respond here.
#[jgmac1106]...kinda true petermolnar....my partner works in restaurants... they are having trouble getting people to work when they get $800 US in unemployment a week (200 from state and 600 from federal government)...so if a worker returns and make more than 200...they will lose the additional 600....
#[jgmac1106]I am sure there are a ton of people in Connecticut making exactly 199 a week in "partial employment"
#petermolnarmy fault, please use -chat for this, like I should have done
[tantek], wolftune and jasminlopez joined the channel
#jasminlopezGrace Themes produces professional level Best WordPress themes (https://gracethemes.com) for bloggers, agencies, individuals and freelancers. When not building new and awesome WordPress Themes, you'll find us out in the sea catching waves. We pride ourselves in working to WordPress standards, expect to see simple, extendable code, great documentation & a plethora of other features.
wolftune joined the channel
#petermolnarhi jasminlopez, are those themes indieweb (so, microformats) friendly?
#[tantek][jgmac1106] Google Docs are collaboration, but not wikis. E.g. GD is crap for versioning. Yes theoretically you can view past edits, however UI for revert / unrevert etc. is crap. Compare with actual usable version history on an MediaWiki page. Usable versioning is absolutely essential for "safer" collaboration, where the community can much more easily undo damage from bad or unintentionally clumsy actors. In contrast, I see stuff "disappear" all
#[tantek]the time from GD, which leads to people feeling ignored / rejected and leaving. GD is very anti-community in that respect.
#[snarfed]the other thing i think wikis are way better at is integrating multiple pages together and making them feel much more cohesive as a whole. every google doc feels like an individual disconnected island. wikis reinforce the idea that the wiki as a whole is the unit that matters. encourages gardening and interdependence btw pages
#[snarfed]this is something i've felt strongly over the years, and advocated for in workplaces, but always had a hard time describing
Choscura joined the channel
#[LewisCowles][tantek] what issues do you foresee with GD? I've never had an issue reverting other than someone just changing history again, at which point I fork the doc and don't share as a record of their actions
#[KevinMarks]That's true. You can link docs together, but they overhead is higher
#[LewisCowles]google docs isn't perfect, but I do like the comments, the way it doesn't force people who don't need HTML to learn too much
#[LewisCowles]Keep meaning to look into etherpad Algorithm to try to make edit history less awful, but SVN and Git are a little pants in this regard without additional controls too
#Loqisnarfed has 31 karma in this channel over the last year (88 in all channels)
#[tantek]snarfed++ right. Wikis are webby, GD are islands
#[tantek][LewisCowles] not foresee, have had. History, versioning, diffing, undoing, reverting UI is night and day between MediaWiki and GD
#[LewisCowles]Did you blog about it. I'm interested in specifics as I don't have many kind words about MediaWiki
#[tantek]I have many critical words about MediaWiki. However it's also the infrastructural foundation of Wikipedia, so that provides a certain validation of UX design (nothing else has scaled like that) that's worth humbly approaching and learning from.
#JK_na<Loqi "[jk-na] #952 enable content warn"> Yes, that was my ticket.
#[jgmac1106]give me five people looking through the revision history of google docs and the revision history of a mediawiki ...my hypothesis they will understand GDoc edits way better
#[jgmac1106]...and the two UX designers for wikimedia hang here....so bonus
#[jgmac1106]will read it, P. D> Pearson did find that sentence length is sometimes better longer....
#[jgmac1106]but I know of know reading comprehension research that says more information density = greater comprehension.
#[jgmac1106]Be an easy study...and I got to get some stuff out before tenure....still say with random sample people will ind gDocs revision history more useful and easier to understand
#[jgmac1106]tufte as in data visualization...cool will read up....people love pretty pictures...you don't even need good data
#[KevinMarks]Tufte bears reading in full. That is a couple of chapters
seekr joined the channel
#[tantek]This is a problem endemic in web design BTW. Not enough designers have properly read Tufte and are using visual design habits & assumptions decades old, especially when designing anything to do with data, including tables of information like a revision history!
#[tantek]there's also abundant UX testing methodology failures, e.g. focusing purely on "comprehension" rather than *usability*
#[tantek]like give someone a task to view differences across multiple edits
#[tantek]or give someone a task to undo an old edit
#[tantek]anyway that's borderline user / dev so we can take talk of design details / testing methodologies to #indieweb-dev
[jeremycherfas], jgee, [CrowderSoup], [chrisaldrich], leg, markopasha, [schmarty], garrettw, uncle_0gre, tinfoil-hat, gRegorLove, sivoais, wolftune and [LewisCowles] joined the channel; leg left the channel
#[LewisCowles]If this were the case, why have many more not flocked to alternative systems. It seems like in this case the system is genius and us poor fools cannot help but fail to be impressed by it
#[LewisCowles]I'm not the most in awe of popularity as the masses are not good at being great at anything past continuing to exist, but...
Choscura joined the channel
#[LewisCowles]> having to scroll to see the info harms comprehension
#[LewisCowles]I think we can agree on this. However there is a finite capacity to the density that lay-users can make use of.
#[schmarty]I think a lot of why google docs may be perceived as easier is that folks think first about what they perceive as the main activity. Starting a doc, typing and pasting links, sharing a link for reading, these are things that gdocs has made incredibly easy
anotheryou joined the channel
#[schmarty]Collaboration seems easy as multiple people can type, but quickly leads to conflicts and confusion. Comments are literally a new layer on top of the document.
#[schmarty]GDocs falls down on the "advanced" and meta-stuff. Maintaining relationships between docs, understanding and managing revision history. But by the time someone thinks of these it is probably too late
#[schmarty]Wow I used a lot of words to say "worse is better"
#[schmarty]What I was trying to say is that things like gdocs get popular precisely because it has focused design effort on what people *think* the primary activity will be
#[schmarty]And by the time they know better it is probably too late to migrate to something better
#[tantek]right, need something better that supports export/import migration
#[tantek]I've definitely seen teams use GD ephemeral and then copy paste the result somewhere else
#jackyhmm I don't understand why Kev is promoting the _hiding_ of an h-card
seekr, [chrisaldrich], Simounet, wolftune and [tantek] joined the channel
#[tantek]jacky, my guess is the prevalent messaging in the industry to stick machine-things in the <head> with <meta> etc. OGP, TwitterCards, oh this must be the IndieWeb version