petermolnarthere are many indie/p2p/etc efforts out there - dat/hyperdrive, IPFS, scuttlebutt; etc - maybe a self-hosted activitypub silos, like mastodon, diaspora, etc fall under this category as well. Thinking about it, they could be, from our perspective, thought of, as indie "silos", meaning there could (should?) be ways to POSSE/PESOS to/from them. (I know brid.gy has an engine for mastodon). I'm curious about thoughts on this topic.
swentel, KartikPrabhu, omz13_, jacky-, kiryin, wagle, kensp and [Steen_Comer] joined the channel
[Steen_Comer]Hey all. I’m a writer interested in indieweb and related open technologies. I’m finally getting around to writing a post on convincing folks to use RSS, and while going through my notes found this chat, and thought I should see what it was like.
[Steen_Comer]And I need to fix the links on the main page so that it is more clear that the archive is on tinyletter, not buttondown, as I’ve just moved there. It’s here, if you care to look https://tinyletter.com/mediapathic/archive
[Steen_Comer]And I came in around 3am local, and it’s time to go to bed. I’ve mostly just come to idle and see what the current state of things is. I’m sure I’ll be dropping in to ask questions from time to time.
[jgmac1106]I still do a lot of download through html and then run through tidy html to put on websites....google changes all the urls to run their security though...you have to fix every one
petermolnar"I run a restaurant in Cambridge. Here's why we won't be reopening on 4 July" - because my staff is happier furloughed till August? snarky, but potentially true, or somewhat true.
[jgmac1106]...kinda true petermolnar....my partner works in restaurants... they are having trouble getting people to work when they get $800 US in unemployment a week (200 from state and 600 from federal government)...so if a worker returns and make more than 200...they will lose the additional 600....
jasminlopezGrace Themes produces professional level Best WordPress themes (https://gracethemes.com) for bloggers, agencies, individuals and freelancers. When not building new and awesome WordPress Themes, you'll find us out in the sea catching waves. We pride ourselves in working to WordPress standards, expect to see simple, extendable code, great documentation & a plethora of other features.
[tantek][jgmac1106] Google Docs are collaboration, but not wikis. E.g. GD is crap for versioning. Yes theoretically you can view past edits, however UI for revert / unrevert etc. is crap. Compare with actual usable version history on an MediaWiki page. Usable versioning is absolutely essential for "safer" collaboration, where the community can much more easily undo damage from bad or unintentionally clumsy actors. In contrast, I see stuff "disappear" all
[snarfed]the other thing i think wikis are way better at is integrating multiple pages together and making them feel much more cohesive as a whole. every google doc feels like an individual disconnected island. wikis reinforce the idea that the wiki as a whole is the unit that matters. encourages gardening and interdependence btw pages
[LewisCowles][tantek] what issues do you foresee with GD? I've never had an issue reverting other than someone just changing history again, at which point I fork the doc and don't share as a record of their actions
[LewisCowles]Keep meaning to look into etherpad Algorithm to try to make edit history less awful, but SVN and Git are a little pants in this regard without additional controls too
[tantek]I have many critical words about MediaWiki. However it's also the infrastructural foundation of Wikipedia, so that provides a certain validation of UX design (nothing else has scaled like that) that's worth humbly approaching and learning from.
[jgmac1106]give me five people looking through the revision history of google docs and the revision history of a mediawiki ...my hypothesis they will understand GDoc edits way better
[jgmac1106]Be an easy study...and I got to get some stuff out before tenure....still say with random sample people will ind gDocs revision history more useful and easier to understand
[tantek]This is a problem endemic in web design BTW. Not enough designers have properly read Tufte and are using visual design habits & assumptions decades old, especially when designing anything to do with data, including tables of information like a revision history!
[tantek]anyway that's borderline user / dev so we can take talk of design details / testing methodologies to #indieweb-dev
[jeremycherfas], jgee, [CrowderSoup], [chrisaldrich], leg, markopasha, [schmarty], garrettw, uncle_0gre, tinfoil-hat, gRegorLove, sivoais, wolftune and [LewisCowles] joined the channel; leg left the channel
[LewisCowles]If this were the case, why have many more not flocked to alternative systems. It seems like in this case the system is genius and us poor fools cannot help but fail to be impressed by it
[schmarty]I think a lot of why google docs may be perceived as easier is that folks think first about what they perceive as the main activity. Starting a doc, typing and pasting links, sharing a link for reading, these are things that gdocs has made incredibly easy
[schmarty]Collaboration seems easy as multiple people can type, but quickly leads to conflicts and confusion. Comments are literally a new layer on top of the document.
[schmarty]GDocs falls down on the "advanced" and meta-stuff. Maintaining relationships between docs, understanding and managing revision history. But by the time someone thinks of these it is probably too late
[schmarty]What I was trying to say is that things like gdocs get popular precisely because it has focused design effort on what people *think* the primary activity will be
[tantek]jacky, my guess is the prevalent messaging in the industry to stick machine-things in the <head> with <meta> etc. OGP, TwitterCards, oh this must be the IndieWeb version