maxwelljoslynthe <img> has u-photo, and gets picked up correctly with Monocle's parser preview, but doesn't show up on the events page -- is it b/c my "notes" are actually articles? :*(
[Murray]Wow, on npr declining the GDPR/cookie request serves a page with just text, not even CSS. That's kinda great actually (and loaded _so fast_ compared to what I'm used to 😄 )
@yuuuanw👋 Design Twitter, recently I started researching and saving design books written by women and people of color. It has grown into a collection that also includes books about research and content strategy. http://yuanwang.design/resources Spread the word if you find it useful. ❤️ (twitter.com/_/status/1295125412461256704)
wolftune, jonnybarnes and kensp joined the channel
Jeena1I totally forgot about the fact that I have events on my website so I didn't host any event there since 2017 but today I remembered! https://jeena.net/events/26
[tantek]if I do this it'll likely "force" me to make them have a URL date that is based on when I started it (created it?) not "published date", and I think I'm ok with that
ndegruchyYeah, giving comments a status requires a bit of engineering, unless you're marking it on your own system and not trying to send it back ala webmention
[tantek]not sure about the strictness / fragility of being bound to a hash (e.g. in Google Docs, changes in other parts of a document don't make comments in one part less true / relevant)
Jeena1I think UI wise it's ok to show the comments in the latest version but there should be a link to show the post how it looked like when that comment was made.
ndegruchyso temporally, the diff/hash point, but fragment bound. Then you can layer the diffs on top, and as the fragment still exists, bring it forward
ndegruchyI wonder if you could bundle up that kind of document into a gzip of git history or similar, and just parse out the latest revision with any comments
ndegruchyI imagine corruption of said document would be pretty ugly to try and untangle, though depending on how bad, you could parse out commit entries and recover that
ndegruchymayakate[m]: Yeah, trying to link to fragments is one of those holy grail kind of things, though. Since content changes so frequently, it's usually not a reliable linking mechanism
Jeena1The nice thing is that those would just move with the text if you insert something in front of them and they would be removed with the text if you remove the text etc.
ndegruchyit works with how reality is. in an ideal situation, we'd never have to worry about the information being gone, because there would be some sort of ephemeral copy floating around with our reference point.
ndegruchyyou could hide the referenced data in with the reference link... though you run into storage and complexity issues, as well as hidden metadata