[schmarty]For example, that search engines serve a need which news publishers do not, that news publisher content in search engines already provides the publishers value, and that taxing search engines when they index certain content is a link tax and damaging to the idea of the web.
[schmarty]Similarly the idea that Facebook should pay when someone shares a news article there is silly in the context of FB being a way for individuals to connect and share.
[schmarty](It arguable whether FB in the context of a promoting the most provoking content to users to drive a viral engagement engine, is still a different information "need" than publishers fill)
[tantek]^ [KevinMarks] you may also want to comment on that regarding Fragmentions and presumably using that Browser Add-on to be able to make/bookmark fragmentions on any site right?
[tantek]comments << Example: using GitHub issues for comments on their posts: this issue seems to be setup to literally be the comment thread for a particular post: https://github.com/karlcow/otsukare.info/issues/2 — which if the issue was marked up as a syndication of the post, Bridgy could backfeed the issue comments to the post! See also https://utteranc.es/
KartikPrabhu, Ariadne, anotheryou, Ariadne_, benwerd, joshproehl, [tantek], danlyke, neshpion, ShadowKyogre, kensp, [KevinMarks], scojjac, gRegorLove, scojjac_ and [schmarty] joined the channel; ShadowKyogre left the channel
LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "wrong with you" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "wrong with you is ____", a sentence describing the term)