tomlarkworthy!tell chrisaldrich you can login to https://observablehq.com/@endpointservices/storage with IndieAuth, but you need your observable profile (e.g. https://observablehq.com/@tomlarkworthy) backlinked to your homepage for you to do admin actions on cloud storage. I am not part of Observable so you need to use its traditional approach to get an account on the Observable platform. I have created a login system in 'userspace' and used relmeauth to
Loqi[chrisaldrich]: tomlarkworthy left you a message 28 minutes ago: you can login to https://observablehq.com/@endpointservices/storage with IndieAuth, but you need your observable profile (e.g. https://observablehq.com/@tomlarkworthy) backlinked to your homepage for you to do admin actions on cloud storage. I am not part of Observable so you need to use its traditional approach to get an account on the Observable platform. I have created a login system in 'userspace' and used relmeauth to
tomlarkworthy, [chrisaldrich], [KevinMarks], Caleb[m]1 and dhanesh joined the channel
[snarfed]to be fair, Stamos didn’t mention Facebook once in the quote [KevinMarks] referred to, and I didn’t read it as implying anything about Facebook either. he seemed to address all social apps/functionality equally
[chrisaldrich]Stamos doesn't mention Facebook, but as the former Facebook chief security officer, he's providing an implied defense of Facebook (and most of big tech in general) while simultaneously throwing a firebomb in the direction of Strava with implications relating to fear, uncertainty, and doubt about national security for an American audience). It's all just being done with a wink and a nod and requires more context and background which isn't in
[chrisaldrich]Some of this is also being done in light of congressional testimony within the last two weeks (see the librarianshipwreck article above) which has serious implications for government oversight of social media. Stamos' comment underlines fears for national security >>> social media regulation for the unstudied congressmen/senators/president he's subtly lobbying here.
[chrisaldrich]Not mentioned there is the same sort of massive data collection done by foreign governments in an attempt to out operatives/spies. That statement is talking about not sharing data with strangers, but the bigger target might be a company like Facebook itself which could employ a foreign national with access to its database for custom queries about potential spies and targets.
[chrisaldrich]If you take the argument a tad further, if it's not okay for strangers to have that data, why should Facebook or other companies? What steps are they taking to prevent it at the next level up?
[chrisaldrich]And to circle it back around 😉, a future president might ask themselves, "Would I post this data publicly on my personal website instead of this social app?"
[fluffy]In my defense, I had only written it as a quick hack for my own site and then other people were interested enough that I moved it into its own repo.
[Ana_Rodrigues]jamietanna thanks for your article (the social reader one). We talked about it lots in our HWC London last Wednesday and I learned quite a few things!
jamietanna[m]Thanks [Ana_Rodrigues] glad it made some good conversations - is there anything interesting to share back / for me to read on i.e. an Etherpad?
[schmarty]i have to scoot. thanks all for a fun webmentions popup! i am now chasing down rabbit holes for how to use silly static site tricks to make single-tenant webmention.io sites as like a netlify site 😂
[Ana_Rodrigues]Thank you all! It will be light years until I can even think about hosting my own webmentions so this was insightful. I was feeling a bit shy but I think one day I’d like to chat a bit more about receiving especially on blocklists / muted people and safety.
jackytbh I'm falling into the camp of thought that [tantek] mentioned some time ago - flipping it such that you invite people you know to your site and everyone else can be put under a different 'view'