billbennettnz, [tw2113_Slack_] and gxt joined the channel
#Ruxton[tantek]: yeah its crazy over here with that..
#Ruxtongroup admins on FB have been legally held liable for peoples posts
#Ruxtonit blew up hard in a group I was in the other week, when a story about someone in the community being accused of sexual abuse rose up
#Ruxtonthe moderating on the discussion was heavy and imo affected the discussion and outcomes because too many people were scared of defamation law suits
hendursaga, sennomo, n8chz and [fluffy] joined the channel
#capjamesg[d]"This is a mess. It might get up to the Supreme Court, but no matter what happens, don’t expect any good solutions as long as lawyers and judges don’t understand technology."
#Loqitantek has 10 karma in this channel over the last year (56 in all channels)
#capjamesg[d]Regarding de-duping, I have just cleaned up what should be all duplicates. Those duplicates were left over from a previous crawl, before I added in better duplication checking. Feel free to try again 🙂 There are ten unique results for your query now.
#capjamesg[d]What did you mean re: "site" and "post" results? Can you elaborate a bit more? I could add some feature that let you search for unique sites and blog posts.
#capjamesg[d][KevinMarks] "you could maybe make better SERPS to show post types" What would you recommend?
#capjamesg[d]Adding a badge that said "Recipe" or "Home" or "Blog post" or "Review" based on markup?
[snarfed] and hendursa1 joined the channel
#[KevinMarks]Showing a richer information card depending on the post type - photo, review, recipe ingredients etc
_inky joined the channel
#jeremycherfas!tell petermolnar That is very interesting, especially the whole question of embedding versus downloading a copy and hosting it yourself (if you can).
#capjamesg[d]tantek Can you elaborate on what you would expect from the "Mozilla" query?
#capjamesg[d]The question I have faced a lot is how to extract meaningful information from a limited dataset.
#capjamesg[d]Our wiki page on Mozilla is not very comprehensive. I could tap into that page for a basic definition but that's probably not the best idea because someone who sees a link to a resource at the top of a page would likely expect that resource to be authoritative and comprehensive.
#capjamesg[d]I could technically integrate Wikipedia I suppose. But then Wikipedia would likely rank very well for a lot of terms, thus displacing some personal sites that might have relevant content.
#capjamesg[d]I don't have any "right" answers haha 😄
hendursaga, sennomo, sennomo_, voxpelli, jbove, Allie, qa6, ehmry, Zegnat[d] and Moosadee joined the channel