ShinyCyril_, gxt_, wagle and jgee joined the channel
#[tantek]Has anyone figured out good practices for responses to limited audience posts? E.g. clearly it would be bad to post a public /reply to a limited audience post and include it in the public /reply-context, violating the audience expectations of the original publisher.
#[tantek]how about something like a /like of a limited audience post? Even "just" a like might be a bad idea, even only revealing the URL of the limited audience post
#[tantek]use-case: using your own website to like a protected account tweet
#[tonz]wrt to the Kevin Kelly article on ‘the proprietary path’ mentioned here a few days ago: isn’t it rather odd for Kelly to gain and name this insight only now?
#@AstroKatie“But what about the echo chamber??” I mean sure I could spend my day being yelled at by an anonymous account called TruthWarrior937362 in the hope that this would somehow enrich my intellectual life or alternatively I could read a book (twitter.com/_/status/1543678955399659526)
geoffo, Seirdy, jacky and sp1ff joined the channel
#[fluffy]1@gwg [jacky] yeah I have had limited audience posts for quite some time, and I've been eager for ticket auth to make that easier for folks to subscribe to them properly.
#GWG[fluffy]: We should do more group hacking on it
tetov-irc, geoffo, AramZS, Seirdy, [Scott_Jack], alex11 and jacky joined the channel
#[fluffy]1I feel like the important next thing for it is to have one (1) feed reader that supports it.