#@danielpunkassIn light of everything happening at Twitter, a lot of people are wondering "where to go next". May I suggest, and I am speaking to myself here too, that you invest in your own blog on your own domain? Own your own content, and share your thoughts independently of dingaling CEOs. (twitter.com/_/status/1586125624632135680)
#@acegiakso then it's pay-to-play or piggyback off someone else's domain and thus you're beholden to someone else again. There's no equitable technical solution. A social solution is required. (twitter.com/_/status/1586318468042805250)
#[tantek]this is something that the entire web3/blockchain crowd misses, they focus on the technical aspect of DNS and completely ignore all the social, political, and frankly legal & regulatory apparatuses that are in place are key to have it function as a system
#ash[m]My conclusion is that it always falls back to social.
#[tantek]and then they handwave about somehow magically "blockchain" solves all socio-political problems (which it obviously doesn't). classic Nirvana fallacy example.
#Loqifriendly reminder [tantek], it looks like this conversation is getting pretty technical (blockchain, web3), can you take it to #indieweb-dev?
#[tantek]ash[m], yes, any system where you have to manage a shared resource (a set of names) like that across lots of people requires a socio-political foundation, regardless of what technology is used
#[tantek]and speaking of "pay-to-play", the crypumpto crowd's proposals are much worse, "pump-dump-to-play"
#ash[m]I'm just frustrated cause I want it to be easy to get friends set up with their own sites and technical problems are things that can be solved by one person (me), but if they don't want to pay money, which is the barrier of entry for domains, then we're back to social problems
#[tantek]and if people don't think it's "worth" the cost, that's ok too. the challenge is not to lower the cost to zero but rather to increase the usefulness so that that fraction-of-a-phone-number-cost is easily considered worth it
#[tantek]part of that usefulness also requires reducing the unnecessary hassles in setup, and minimizing ongoing /admintax
#Loqi[Eugen 💀] Update: 49,215 new users across different Mastodon servers since yesterday. Probably a lot of them are actually from yesterday. My crawler only runs once a day so I get a bit of a delayed view of things.
#[timothy_chambe]Indieweb.social is seeing 25-50 new users daily migrating over to it from Twitter.
[tonz], toastloop, [pfefferle], geoffo, mro and kuba_ joined the channel
#[tantek]!tell [snarfed] is there a page on Bridgy Fed where I can view the number of followers for a particular @-@ username handled by Bridgy Fed? Or even an agregate view of "recent Bridgy Fed users / posts", like I think OwnYourGram used to do back in the day
#[KevinMarks]I followed you on xoxo.zone, t I don't see any posts
#[tantek][KevinMarks] did you follow before after I posted? If you followed after I posted, then you're seeing expected behavior. AP does not show you posts from before you followed.
#[KevinMarks]It is a lot more fragile than the old OStatus model with feeds and WebSub, certainly
#[tantek]certainly. that's partly what my most recent note gets into
#[snarfed][tantek] no real Bridgy Fed UI or stats yet, no, either aggregate or per user
#[snarfed]as I mentioned the other day, after experience talking with lots of people about whether to use Bridgy or Bridgy Fed, 99% of people generally want and should use Bridgy. which (rightly!) extremely limits the Bridgy Fed user base, which disincentivizes me to develop it much
geoffo, sebbu2, nertzy and slyduda joined the channel