#indieweb 2023-01-17
2023-01-17 UTC
starrwulfe joined the channel
# [KevinMarks] Scalzi has been indieweb for 15 years this year https://whatever.scalzi.com/2023/01/13/whatever-twenty-five-part-one-introduction-scene-setting/
[Tim_Nolte], starrwulfe and [timothy_chambe] joined the channel
# [timothy_chambe] The Post announces that it will support #ActivityPub and be Mastodon interoperable in 2023: https://twitter.com/noelbaron/status/1605063762922409984
# @noelbaron If you’re trying to decide between Post and Mastodon, it’s all good. Post will formally support ActivityPub protocol mid-2023. Visit both! (twitter.com/_/status/1605063762922409984)
starrwulfe, frenzcan, gRegor, gRegorLove_, Alec, Nuve, Guest6 and geoffo joined the channel
# [KevinMarks] Feels like Anil is describing bridgy's consent model https://anildash.com/2023/01/16/a-fediverse-search/
starrwulfe joined the channel
# [KevinMarks] [tantek] another service for omitting reposts is https://github.com/cookiemumbles/justmytoots.com
# [KevinMarks] Requires link based opt in
gxt and starrwulfe joined the channel
# [TMichelleMoore] [KevinMarks] [snarfed] Can you confirm my understanding of the issue? Fediverse people don’t want search? The reason I am questioning my understanding is that you can search almost every post/toot that is public even without logging in. Just trying to understand what the real issue is.
# [KevinMarks] There's a substantial contingent of fediverse users who have seen how search has been used on twitter to target people and want to avoid that happening on mastodon, and are being clear that any search indexing should be opt-in. Anil's and Janl's posts talk about this, and I have seen that reaction from a lot of mastodon instance admins.
# [KevinMarks] They recall the path that twitter took, (which I have written about before https://www.kevinmarks.com/twitterhatespeech.html ) and want to avoid the affordances that drives that
# [snarfed] Also [TMichelleMoore] Mastodon search doesn't search all posts, it only searches users and hashtags on the local instance. https://docs.joinmastodon.org/user/network/#search
# [TMichelleMoore] [KevinMarks] and [snarfed] Thank you! I got it. I will read Kevin’s article also.
h3rb1, starrwulfe, [schmarty], joj, [aciccarello], barnaby and gaussianblue joined the channel
# starrwulfe[m] Sure-- I use Jitsi -- found on there as an alternative to Zoom.
# starrwulfe[m] I also found Owncast there as an alternative to Twitch as I was looking with some gamer friends as an alternative to self host something for ourselves
# starrwulfe[m] Loqi: Sure++
# starrwulfe[m] Keep forgetting not to emdash here. 🤦🏾♂️
# starrwulfe[m] I'll put something together if needed. It's a very well trafficked and referenced site especially for those of us using Linux that are always needing something equivalent to certain desktop software
# starrwulfe[m] Or when looking for FOSS alternatives to closed source software
# [aciccarello] I'll occasionally look at alternativeto.net but if I recall that was more useful when looking for software to download.
Nuve, starrwulfe and gRegor joined the channel
# Loqi angelo: [snarfed] left you a message 1 week, 4 days ago: saw you had trouble with Bridgy Fed yesterday, sorry! it was a bug, I've fixed it and pushed your post through, hope you don't mind. https://indieweb.social/@ragt.ag@ragt.ag/109644123476808177
# Loqi unlisted are publicly visible posts that are not included in a homepage or feed(s), and are typically excluded from site search features and broader web search services https://indieweb.org/unlisted
# Loqi It looks like we don't have a page for "unindexed" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "unindexed is ____", a sentence describing the term)
# [snarfed] somewhere in https://indieweb.org/unlisted#Brainstorming ?
# [tantek] interesting, in 2020 I did use /unindexed as a wiki-linked term in chat despite the page not existing
n8chz joined the channel
# [KevinMarks] So unindexed was unlisted?
starrwulfe and Nuve joined the channel
# [0x3b0b] There also might be cases where people would like something they posted as unlisted to be searchable. And as a lot of people have emphatically (in some cases vehemently) pointed out, on top of the many problems there would be with making it opt-out, making it opt-in based on something that is already in place would run the risk of treating existing users as opted in who did not expect what they opted into to mean that.
# [snarfed] this is entertaining: https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/resolving-the-note-vs-article-distinction/258
starrwulfe joined the channel
# [0x3b0b] I think Anil's idea has some merit - on a technical level it seems like you could get a long way toward the goal just by driving it off a bot that automatically follows its followers and unfollows anyone who unfollows it. Except I feel like there are probably people who would expect "followers only" posts not to be indexed.
starrwulfe joined the channel