sebbu3, Dryusdan, pmlnr, Weiz, ren, thegreekgeek_, btrem and GreatNous joined the channel
#btremUsing webmentions, you can record likes, reposts, etc. on a post. There is no way (that I know of) to thank people who helped with a post in some manner. Has anyone ever discussed this idea?
#btremSpecifically, I'm thinking of a webmention-y way of thanking people for editing draft copies of my articles, but I imagine other things might be desirable.
#[aciccarello]I think there was some discussion of co-authors but editors sounds different.
#[aciccarello]A basic link should always work but I'm not sure if there is anything more structured.
#btremI'd think you could have more than one p-author for co-authors. But yeah, nothing more structured for other kinds of thank-yous.
#aaronpkwhat would you want the person you're mentioning to do/see when they get the notification?
#btremaaronpk: not sure, this is rather vague in my head right now.
#[tantek]aaronpk, I can think of one as a potential receiver of such webmentions: an automatic home page display / feed of "posts I helped with/reviewed before publication"
#[tantek]I think we have examples or documentation maybe in post footer, let me check
#btremCould I perhaps try something out using p-x-blah-blah-blah? Hmm, this might have to move to #dev. ;-)
#aaronpku- but yes brainstorming markup should move to #indieweb-dev
#Loqifriendly reminder btrem, aaronpk, can you move the tech talk (Microformats, markup) to #indieweb-dev to keep this channel more inclusive and inviting?
#gRegorThat can cover a variety of things like proofreading, ideas, moral support
#btremIn fact, gRegor, you're the one I'm crediting, for looking over my article about microformats. (I dare not specify the topic any further. I've already peeved Loqi once today.)
#btremYeah, might work, but then she can still hear me with her uncovered ear.
#btremI can poll GitHub to display a list of my repos and display them on my website. I think I can request a list of contributions, though ICBW. Can I do something similar with my contributions to the indieweb or microformats wiki? I don't think so, but it's worth asking.
#btremBecause listing your webmention credits as I've suggested would sort of be like listing your wiki contributions, no?
#btremOr rather, "...like listing your GH contributions...." Which lots of people probably already do.
#btremDoing research is going to be nigh impossible. How would one search for examples of "credits" or "thank-you" on the web? :-/
#osteophageIn blogging I've seen that called an acknowledgements section.
#[tantek]btrem, yup you found something a bunch of us do / have done (from a publishing perspective) but it's not documented on the wiki
#[tantek]alright, time to document the human visible publishing behavior, and the we can use that to inform consuming use-cases and then any #indieweb-dev brainstorming
#btremIWDiscord++ "acknowledgements" might be a better search term. Maybe I'll try that.
#btrem[tantek]: Problem is how to document it. As I said, you can't search the web for "article thank you" because you get only garbage. But I'll try "acknowledgements" and report back here.
#[tantek]btrem, from my anecdotal experience, people literally say "thanks to …" near the footer of their blogs for help with editing, reviewing, feedback on a post
#[tantek]I'll stub a list item with that to start with and we can expand to a subsection or separate page if it grows a lot
#btremYes. It's what I do. But when I stfw for "article thank you", I got "how to engage with visitors who signed up for your newsletter. IOW, marketing crap.
#[tantek]you mean like google search? yeah that's useless for finding indieweb examples
#[tantek]and pretty sure [benatwork] has "Thanks to ..." credits in footers of some articles crediting folks who reviewed or gave feedback on early drafts
#btremWhen I researched restaurant menus for a potential h-menu, web research was pretty easy.
#[tantek]trying to think where else I've seen it. Maybe on [KevinMarks] posts
#[tantek]on the contrary, doing site: specific search on my domain for this worked quite well: "thanks to" reviewing
#btremHah! I tried that and failed. I have what is probably a pretty unusual problem. Years after registering my domain btrem.com, some musical artist from Brazil I think emerged with the name "Btrem." And she has taken over in web searches! Try googling "btrem" and you'll see what I mean. Didn't use to be that way.
#[tantek]I found 8 example posts of mine for this!
#btremSeems like some kind of inadvertent google bombing. :(
#[tantek]btrem, gotta use the "site:" filter explicitly, not just your alias
#btremEven if I search for "btrem.com foo" I get results for her! Yeah, I'll have to explicitly use the filter as you said. Thanks for the reminder, I couldn't remember the syntax. [tantek]++
#Loqi[tantek] has 25 karma in this channel over the last year (145 in all channels)
#[tantek]yes we incentivize people (beyond good feels) to help advance the indieweb by contributing examples on their sites to the wiki with the little bit of search juice. I think that's fine
#[tantek]also frankly google search needs to be showing indieweb results above all their spam slop
#btremHmm. Doing site:btrem.com on Duck Duck Go failed to return any results, even though it is documented. But it /did/ work on Google.
#[tantek]yeah DDG has also dropped a lot of indieweb results from their index (or whoever they are using). it's quite disappointing
#Loqi↬ giving credit is a collection of cultural practices related to acknowledging and attributing text, hyperlinks, quotes, utterances to others, typically by name, as a way of recognizing their contribution(s) https://indieweb.org/giving_credit
#gRegorTook me a minute to get to that page. The chat reminded me I sometimes will post a "via" or "h/t" (hat tip) + link when I'm sharing something. Found /via redirected there :)
#[tantek]right! and via/ht is also different, crediting discovery
#[tantek]maybe that's worth distinguishing somewhere: labor vs discovery vs content
#gRegorI know, just sharing pages in the vicinity of the discussion
#[tantek]yup, I made sure to link to both of those at the # inline and other references link I shared above ^
#[tantek]there's probably enough structure there to already to stub a new page, however I'm hoping the addition of btrem's (and possibly others if we can find them) examples will illuminate naming what the practice is
#[tantek]like off the top of my head "thanking labor" feels the most literal / sufficiently encompassing of editing, reviewing, feedback labors
#[tantek]but also feels a bit dry / abstract possibly academic so other naming suggestions absolutely welcome
#btremSeems like it belongs on the "giving credit" page. But maybe I'm missing something.
#[tantek]other obv naming alternative is just "thanks to" since that seems like a common enough indicator
#btremI like "acknowledgements," since it's the convention for books, in particular non-fiction books. Though I hate spelling that word!
#[tantek]yeah acks also sounds stuffy and academic
#[tantek]almost compulsory, like fine, I'll "acknowledge" these people
#[tantek]whereas "thanks to" feels more like an act of appreciation for what was likely gratis/volunteer labor
#btremIn fact, I'm going to change my pages with thank you notes to add an "acknowlegements" heading. :-p [tantek]
#[tantek]hey! it's your site, use the wording/phrasing that resonates most with you!
#btremI do think that acknowledgements and acknowledge have different feelings. Acknowledge can sound begrudging. But acknowledgements does not. I think because I actually read the acknowledgements section of books. Not every time, but often.
#[tantek]another acks example, at the start of an IndieWebCamp create day demos session (expected to be the final session of the camp, when everyone is paying attention, including remote viewers, and getting it recorded for posterity) https://indieweb.org/2024/SD/intro-demos#Acknowledgements
#[tantek]artlung++ for that good example practice and probably something we should add as a suggestion to the How to run an IndieWebCamp docs
#Loqiartlung has 1 karma in this channel over the last year (4 in all channels)
#[morganm]I made this proposal on Mozilla Web Docs on GitHub to add a section about Web Sustainability. If this or the links contained within interest you, would love it if you commented or emoji'd support for what you may like to see or that it gets worked on
strugee, [schmarty], paotsaq, cedric, _justin_kelly9, ren-, ben__, tyil, ren, nemonical, barnaby, glacier, plantroon, Dryusdan and sandra joined the channel
#pmlnrtalking about webmentions (no Loqi, no -dev), please try to figure out if they fall into www.theregister.com/2025/01/14/online_safety_act or not. I believe not.
RapidRotator, glacier, Guest6_ and [Scout] joined the channel
#[Scout]i came across https://www.theregister.com/2025/01/14/online_safety_act/?td=rt-3a which certainly fucks up the kidney patient forum i am managing on the side. probably have to archive it... anyway, is this something we have to worry about with slack and discord? or does it not apply? it's like the government is purposefully trying to screw over small non-profits and hobby users in favour of massive multi-nationals 😠
#[Scout]sorry, should have read the previous post already mentioning the same article lol
#[Scout]but i suppose the scope is widening thinking of our own channels
#pmlnrthere's a loophole in the act: it doesn't apply to private or business internal things. Theoretically that means that invite-only services are exempt.
#petermolnarhowever, webmentions, trackbacks and pingbacks are completely grey area
#petermolnarping [KevinMarks] - you may a have a better understanding
klymilark, paotsaq, ttybitnik, [qubyte], JadedBlueEyes, cedric_ and _justin_kelly0 joined the channel
#[tantek]Huh. Or every Mastodon instance with open registration?
#aaronpkit says it applies to sites with a "significant" number of UK users, which would presumably exclude most indieweb sites for people who are outside of the UK
#aaronpkwebmentions are also very much a grey area because you don't "use" my site when you send me a webmention, you use your own site, so it's not clear whether that applies at all
#[tantek]Yeah, probably worth discussing at the next HWC UK/EU which I believe is today [Scout] Petermolnar
#[tantek]Agreed aaronpk. If your site doesn't allow other "users" at all to post stuff from it like with an account on your site, then I don't see how it applies
#aaronpkright, I'm the only person who has an account on my website
#[tantek]Though could it apply to any multiuser MediaWiki or Mastodon or WordPress instance someone is running?
#aaronpkyea those would be in scope, again with the "significant" number of UK users criteria
#[tantek]Yep. Good reason to keep your personal site indieweb
#aaronpktho mediawiki is an interesting one too because the intent of the site is not to let users talk to each other the way a social networking site works, although you certainly can use it for that
#petermolnari can't attend to hwc today, unfortunately, but please document the discussion, if one happens
#capjamesg[d]We'll take notes and archive them on the wiki!
aelaraji7, ttybitnik, corlaez, raucao, carrvo[d], chenghiz_, geoffo, pax_73, Artea, immibis, Saphire, Menchers, Prutser, capjamesg[d], Bitweasil, blodulv and keehar joined the channel
#carrvo[d]I think the UK safety act is an interesting to think about with Webmentions (with respect to content control and audience). Not having to comply means that more thought and discussion can be had, and it can always be abandoned.