[tantek]The only things I selectively syndicate to Twitter now are posts that are specifically about the indieweb and doing things in indieweb ways, only because I hope there is a chance of reaching the few folks I know still reading there and helping them leave Twitter
GWG[tantek]: I am again looking for more places to engage. I'm trying to pivot a bit, but I'd need to build some stuff. I have publishing stable, I want to look into reading
[tantek]Keep those values in mind, then assess the vibe of any online place similarly, and whether you really want anything you do to be affiliated with that place or not
[Joe_Crawford]On the theory that I might get *someone* to engage with and learn about IndieWeb and San Diego when I announced IWC San Diego I did post to Twitter. But without actually putting money into that bad place I don't believe there's enough casual engagement to discover something indieweb or san diego to matter.
[Joe_Crawford]But also, so many people I followed there I moved my follow of them to their website, their rss, their newsletter, mastodon, bluesky, instagram.
GWGI'm not worried about size... I want to decide where I might start reading posts again outside of reading people's websites... which is a small group
[morganm]Sometimes I get the feeling that many of us here are very online and have been online long enough to see things rise and fall, sort of a informed jadedness, and Tantek is like a titan leading us by example co-existing amongst all this stuff
[morganm]I thought about my start on the web in 1998 with a Gateway 2000 tower computer, 56k , everyone had to get off the phone at home to check out an encylopedia article or something
carrvoNot saying you should do the same (there is a lot to be said with finding like-minded people) but I generally caution against narrowing your view when you go too far away from "outsiders".
bossyThe internet is too structured for my liking now. It's kind of like how high streets here in the UK are just full of the same chains, instead of lots of interesting independent shops. You go to any town centre and it kind of looks the same and the experience is the same. That's how the internet feels to me now.
Lars-Christian@bossy Am aware DRM is mostly a publisher req. I think encouraging people to avoid it where possible is a small step in the direction of change for the better :)
carrvoDRM, I believe, was invented to deal with copyright violations by pirating. So "avoiding it" is maybe not very inviting overall. But encouraging people to be aware of the consequences and evaluate whether it fits their needs is good.
[qubyte]This prompted me to un-drm a bunch of kindle books to calibre. Not for sharing. I just donβt want Amazon to decide they can take the books I paid for away.
[qubyte]These days I mostly read physical print books, but now and then itβs impractical. I removed the DRM from most of my kindle books years ago, so thankfully there were only three to do.
Lars-Christian" encouraging people to be aware of the consequences and evaluate whether it fits their needs is good" yeah this was the point I was trying to get across
Lars-ChristianAnd my DRM talk all originated from Amazon now shutting down the option to sideload books you've bought onto a Kindle (which made it easier to remove the DRM)
Lars-ChristianAmazon shutting that feature down was the kick in the ass I needed to finally download and remove the DRM for the 150 or so books I've bought from Amazon
carrvobossy, Lars-Christian: I can emphasize with the sentiment (I have often found myself in the same position). Unfortunately from a social perspective it is not possible to differentiate between those not interested in sharing and those that will.
bossyI understand why they make it difficult and I kind of understand DRM existing to be honest. I think it's telling however how Amazon go to extra lengths and I think it's probably because they have the biggest potential vendor lock-in from all of the e-reading options. There are more and more e-readers, all as good as Kindle (if not better), they don't want people jumping ship. The other vendors have 'normal' DRM, I'll be using them from now one until something el
bossyThere needs to be some sort of universal DRM transfer option, so just say I move e-reader vendor, I can transfer (not copy) my purchases over from one account to another, but there is no way in hell people like kindle would support such a thing. They want everyone stuck with Amazon forever.