2016-10-06 UTC
KevinMarks, gRegorLove and miklb joined the channel
# 01:35 gRegorLove I just merged someone else's PR fixing some missed closing divs
tantek joined the channel
tantek joined the channel
tantek joined the channel
chrisaldrich1, KevinMarks and AngeloGladding joined the channel
# 05:54 Zegnat I still haven't gotten the extension packaged for easy install, so sorry for that.
kylewm joined the channel
KevinMarks joined the channel
# 05:56 Zegnat It does all the fetching and DOM parsing within the extension itself, and is triggered curently with a button rather than automatically.
# 05:57 Zegnat This comes with its own set of advantages and disadvantages of course, but does solve the whole "third-party" issue as described by sknebel
# 06:00 Zegnat And if people actually start using it, they can start filing bugs ... yeah, I really should package it for easier installing.
# 06:03 Zegnat Mine isn't compatible with Firefox for Android though, but I don't think that usergroup is very big for KevinMarks' extension either
KevinMarks, chrisaldrich_, cweiske, kylewm, tantek, KevinMarks_, plindner and barryf joined the channel
# 12:01 Loqi pfefferle: GWG left you a message 1 day, 17 hours ago: My vim config auto-indents now. I'm not sure why you keep finding issues. I set everything to try and overcome my issues.
# 12:03 GWG pfefferle: Wouldn't that be my superhero weakness?
# 12:05 GWG pfefferle: I hope not. If I was, what is my evil plot? To write open source software to take over the world?
# 12:05 GWG pfefferle: My plans of Indieweb domination aside, anything new there?
# 12:06 pfefferle GWG I made some changes in the new branch... will commit them later, so we can discuss them...
# 12:07 pfefferle GWG like your changes so far, perhaps some small tweaks and we can release the 3.0.0 with API support...
# 12:09 GWG pfefferle, I would like to get a new version out that complies with the specification, which is what started this stream of PRs earlier this year.
# 12:09 pfefferle GWG is the latest branch spec complient or do we still have to add some changes?
# 12:09 GWG Then Semantic Linkbacks still reretrieves the source, which was the other problem on the list.
# 12:10 pfefferle GWG sure, but we should start that one after releasing 3.0.0 of the webmentions
# 12:10 GWG pfefferle, except for asynchronous processing(The basic time delay option I wrote in doesn't really count) and one or two minor recommendations we would be
# 12:11 GWG Asynchronous is a major recommendation but not required.
# 12:12 GWG pfefferle, I am not going anywhere. I will continue to contribute.
# 12:12 pfefferle GWG ok, will have a look at it... What about deleting mentions
# 12:13 GWG pfefferle, in the new code, it passes 410 back to the hook. But currently doesn't do anything with it.
# 12:13 GWG So it is just a matter of adding it.
# 12:13 pfefferle GWG ok, perhaps this will be an easy one to implement before releasing
# 12:15 GWG The question is what a deleted webmention should look like. There are discussions on that. Or whether it should completely vanish.
# 12:17 GWG Probably the default implementation will be to delete it for now
# 13:11 Zegnat GWG: "what is my evil plot? To write open source software to take over the world?" - maybe that's the indieweb conspiracy aaronpk was quoting in #indiechat ;)
kylewm, singpolyma and tantek joined the channel
kylewm, gRegorLove, KartikPrabhu and KevinMarks joined the channel
KevinMarks, KartikPrabhu and tantek joined the channel
ChrisAldrich joined the channel
KartikPrabhu and tantek joined the channel