2017-03-25 UTC
# 00:17 miklb Personally I would side with replies being a webmention comment_type
# 00:18 miklb if it originates as a webmention, that's how it should be stored would be my opnion
# 00:30 GWG But the issue is how WordPress works
# 00:59 GWG Subtype in comment meta isn't a native thing
# 01:05 GWG The type reflecting behavior over source works better with design
# 02:46 miklb lol, semantic linkbacks plugin has a function for retrieving a type of comment. `get_linkbacks`
# 03:19 miklb OK, I went back and looked, and do not see that documented anywhere, so I don't feel quite as silly now.
# 03:42 miklb if anyone has any feedback on that edit. Not sure if normally add code examples in the wiki or not.
[chrisaldrich], tantek, miklb_, miklb, barpthewire, [kevinmarks] and [jeremycherfas] joined the channel
loicm joined the channel
# 13:44 Zegnat I just spotted shrink-to-fit=no in adactio’s viewport meta, is that another must-have one besides width and initial-scale?
[jeremycherfas], leg and venezianboy joined the channel
KartikPrabhu joined the channel
tantek joined the channel
# 16:49 tantek pretty sure there's some implementation in Firefox too
# 16:50 aaronpk that's what foursquare uses to get the hex shape around icons
# 16:51 Loqi [Dirk Schulze] CSS Masking Module Level 1
# 16:54 aaronpk alright, got my comment permalinks for ownyourswarm looking pretty good
# 16:55 tantek will be interesting how you backfeed sticker comments ;)
# 16:55 aaronpk right now i have those as a comment with an img tag in it
# 16:56 tantek ok, because the author of a swarm check-in can add their own photo comments
# 16:56 aaronpk swarm provides what appears to be alt text for stickers
# 16:57 aaronpk if I include the alt text on the img tag, then the name and plaintext content of the h-entry becomes "Beer?"
# 16:57 aaronpk even though when viewed, the h-entry has no visible text content
# 16:58 aaronpk except that's going to look wrong when my site renders the comment
miklb joined the channel
# 17:00 tantek right, it's up to you whether you want to render markup (images etc.) partially or otherwise in comments you've received
# 17:00 aaronpk wait, where's the whole thing about comparing the "name" with "content"
[chrisaldrich] joined the channel
# 17:02 tantek right, I think somewhere we talk about html sanitization if you want to use the markup in e-content instead of just the plain text
# 17:03 aaronpk well, I have some code that compares "name" and "content" to determine whether the comment has a name, e.g. when I receive webmentions from blog posts
# 17:03 tantek right - so if they're the same - the comment does not have name right?
# 17:03 aaronpk but now i'm not sure whether I used the "value" of the content or the "html" of the content
# 17:04 aaronpk comparing the "value" of the content with the "name" will be equal, but comparing with the HTML will be not equal
# 17:07 aaronpk interesting. well it looks like it correctly determines there is no "name" property
# 17:08 aaronpk however it then returns both the plaintext "Beer?" as well as the img tag for the content property
# 17:08 aaronpk i believe that means my site will prioritize the html content and use that
# 17:09 aaronpk i feel like we need this example somewhere as a test case though. seems easy to trip up
# 17:10 tantek yes it is worth documenting at least as an IndieWeb Example with points underneath it that describe the details you just did
# 17:11 tantek and if we see a pattern emerge across implementations, we can make explicit guidance accordingly
# 17:15 aaronpk hm i think not, since if two people post the same sticker they are shown as separate comments rather than being rolled up into a count
# 17:15 tantek I feel like they are a one-off on Swarm as I've never seen them anywhere else
# 17:16 tantek ok that's enough for a dfn since you've made observations
# 17:16 tantek sticker comment should be distinguished from both reacji and photo comments, since it could be mistaken for eeither one
# 17:17 aaronpk a sticker comment is what a [[sticker reply ]] looks like in the context of the original post that it is in reply to
tantek and miklb joined the channel
[chrisaldrich], [kevinmarks] and leg joined the channel
[kevinmarks], [jeremycherfas], [chrisaldrich] and benclark joined the channel