gRegorLovemiklb: That %1s, the "1" is the argument number. It can be used for argument swapping. Not really necessary in that line of code since there's only one argument, $embed
[cleverdevil]Use case: I want `/timeline` or `/stream` on my site to be internally rewritten to return the content that is available at `/content/bookmarkedpages/statusupdates`.
[chrisaldrich]cleverdevil, btw, I set up oAuth on known.boffosocko.com, so you should be able to install https://github.com/mapkyca/KnownKnown on your personal Known instance and syndicate to the other one, the github page has some reasonable directions.
miklbso this is what I'm figuring out and why there is a blockquote inside a blockquote. somewhere the embed is being stored in the postmeta and that's where the link to the tweet without u-url is. Now to just figure out how to customize that.
miklbGWG that whole chunk of html (<blockquote class=twitter-tweet">…</blockquote> is stored in the db as postmeta, I'm looking at the filter now to change add the u-url when it's saved
miklbI like the idea of the embeded tweet, especially if it's part of a thread/conversation, more context. Just want to see if I can filter that and add the class.
miklbmy goal currently is purely for my own site. If it can be useful for others, awesome. I just want to have embedded Tweets and for bridgy to know it's a reply. I'm not sure where else I could put the u-url
LoqiA quote tweet (also known as a "retweet with comment") is a reply on Twitter to an original tweet that displays the entirety of the original in a reply-context below the reply text https://indieweb.org/quote_tweet
miklbtantek here's the thing. If I were just a new user, and managed to get all the plugins installed, hooked up with bridgy and I were to set the type to reply, add the link to the url and write my reply, the plugin would return an error saying bridgy can't find the link to the tweet, even though you are looking at it the link in the post editor, see it on Twitter. I'm trying to fix that. Nothing ground breaking, nothing out-of-the-box
martymcguire[m]this is plumbing-y, but i'd be happy with receiving a "u-quotation-of" URL and feeding that into my site's reply context system. i'd display the entire content or a truncated summary.
Loqi[Marty McGuire] Congrats to @thatonegm for publishing Four Sherlock Holmes and a Vampire. One-up your friends, solve the crime, and maybe be a vampire!
martymcguire[m]it's implemented as an in-reply-to, and (when i show tweets correctly in my reply contexts) would show the complete tweet that i am replying to. a /reader subscribed to my site would show that context and my text, and that would be what i want.
miklbnot true with bridgy I don't think. I had a note I added in-reply-to manually to a link and it showed up as a reply on Twitter even though I didnt' start the note with @
martymcguire[m]i posted a note to my site in-reply-to a twitter URL where the content of the note did not start with an @. however, when i used bridgy publish to POSSE this note to twitter, it was posted as a reply to the tweet rather than quoting the tweet.
tantekIssue: if a reply to a tweet already has the @-name in the content that will get tweeted, DO NOT duplicate the @-name at the start of the POSSE tweet reply copy
martymcguire[m](my theory is that bridgy is specifying that the tweet is a reply in the API request to twitter, causing twitter to start the canoe. in that case the @-name at the start of the text is being added by twitter in display of the tweet.)
martymcguire[m]the more i think about it, the more i think this isn't a bug so much as a use case falling through the cracks of twitter's @-name handling in replies.
snarfedtldr: it's not actually duplicating them. the prefixed @-mentions aren't actually in the tweet text. afaik the problem is that loqi doesn't yet support twitter's new extended tweet format, so it's incorrectly rendering them as though they are
martymcguire[m]snarfed++ for the reply! that is what i having trouble articulating. the "@-name" isn't duplicated "in" the tweet as twitter displays it in the twitter UI.
martymcguire[m]so i'm back to wanting a way to differentiate "a reply on my site that should be a reply on twitter" vs "a reply on my site that should be a quote on twitter"
[eddie]I wonder if at some point you could say if h-cite exists (aka reply context) it would quote tweet with comment, and if a single u-reply-to href exists without h-cite, then it would be a true “reply”
[eddie]Because by using an h-cite rather than just a link with u-reply-to, aren’t you in essence trying to point out the content as opposed to just replying to the person?
martymcguire[m]from the discussion on /quotation, i definitely see these as /reply posts. it's like twitter has a distinction that my site doesn't because my site doesn't have canoes. :}
[eddie]I agree with martymcguire[m] I see them as replies, I think the main difference is context. One is you are trying to show context (quote tweet) and one where you don’t care about the context, because you are assuming the person already knows the context
martymcguire[m][eddie]: it's also a question of audience. twitter will put a /quote_tweet on my public timeline under "Tweets", but an @-reply is under "Tweets and Replies" (and may not be visible to my followers? is that still true?)
[eddie]That’s true, although if you click “Reply” to someone and type something before the @-mention (on a third party twitter client, because, Twitter…), I think it might make it public but still a reply
martymcguire[m]bridgy publish does support making quote tweets if you replace in-reply-to with quotation-of, but i am not sure it is worth it to build that difference into my site
martymcguire[m][eddie]: it does seem that twitter's new reply-handling implementation breaks expectations of the old behavior that position of @-mentions matters.
martymcguire[m]if i were to implement twitter-style-replies, i'd make the post to my site and send webmentions for it, but it wouldn't appear in my stream(s).
martymcguire[m]and if i wanted to implement twitter-style-quotes on my site, i'd make the post to my site and include it in my streams. but instead of sending a webmention to the post i'm replying to, i'd send a person-tag??
@ThatOneGMEveryone Is John is super fun, and I loved last night's episode. Next week, I'm running Wushu! Expect over-the-top action and wackiness. QT [@schmarty] @DnDSVU Had a blast running Everyone is John on @DnDSVU last night! Looking forward to next week when @thatonegm runs another one-shot. (twitter.com/_/status/851895381906554880)
martymcguire[m]if i want to make a simple workflow for something like quill, maybe i'd make two twitter syndication targets: one that treats replies as replies (ie - just passes through normal in-reply-to mf2 markup) and one that treats replies as quotes (ie - uses quotation-of mf2 markup for bridgy)
[eddie]cleverdevil++ Ran into DNS issues over the end of last week/weekend when I switched to DreamCompute ? (DNS issues weren’t DreamHost’s issue, other servers issue). So I couldn’t do micropub all weekend. But the DNS issues seem resolved, so I’m looking forward to getting some testing done on it this week ?
[cleverdevil]Looking forward to it. I think its a real key to making the entire user experience better. Integrated sharing in both iOS and and macOS will be fantastic.
[cleverdevil]Eventually, I'd like to move back to a native feed reader like Reeder.app, which I love, but it (a) doesn't sync with Nextcloud News's API yet, and (b) Doesn't support Micropub sharing yet.
gRegorLoveI think if you start off a tweet with an @-mention of someone, not @-reply, that's visible to all your followers, regardless if they follow that user. All subsequent replies are *not* shown your followers, unless they also follow the initial @-mention user.