ZegnatHmm, I think I have seen unlisted used before. Makes sense as a term: the post is published and available at its URL, just not shown in any index/feed/overview
tantek_Wow in the first four days of April, this IP address did 300k requests for ~4GB from my site: 194.74.171.82 - supposedly in Liverpool, England. Y THO? Anyone else see that address in their logs?
Loqiaaronpk: swentel left you a message 6 hours, 2 minutes ago: still no updates on my timeline in aperture - but no rush, I can always delete and reimport if needed :)
LoqiHave we officially left nice emails behind? I usually use an “interleaved
posting” style when writing email. Today someone ended an email to me as
follows, and my heart broke a little:
Btw, your replies are ...
singpolyma"they [users] want a feed or stream that shows them the most important content first" -- I often want this, by my anecdotal experience with less-technical users is that they *hate* this. I expect it's a matter of personal taste and should say "some users" :P
singpolymaMaybe that's what it is. Power users who follow lots of publishers want filters and ranking, people who just follow their friends and parents keep hitting the "most recent" button on their facebook homepage
schmartythe ability to collect a bunch of feeds as "raw" data that a personalized service can rank and re-prioritize for viewing in an app like /Monocle or /Together or /Indigenous.
singpolymaYeah, they look like they're using social engagement and such too, though maybe in a smaller way than we were (just looking at your contacts or something? hard to tell from the marketing)
[cleverdevil]I sort of like the idea of publishing an XFN list of people I "follow" on my website, and then having the third party service look at what they repost/like/bookmark, then publish things via Micropub to Aperture for discovery.
skippyjust because X number of my friends engaged with something isn't a reliable indicator that I want to engage with it. I dont want to live in an echo chamber.
aaronpkjalcine: thx! did you try it out? I'm a little scared of finding out how many more XML-RPC edge cases I'm gonna need to handle to support more clients
aaronpki wonder if i just didn't implement that in xray? i see no author on the h-entry, so the next step says to check for author on the parent h-feed, which there is, and it's a URL to https://vanderven.se/martijn/
ZegnatThis might be another edge-case. If you are parsing only the element refered to by the fragment in the mf2 parser, you are never parsing the h-feed?
Loqi[Kevin Marks] @Gargron the other way of thinking about this is more federation. Webmentions are not like pingbacks, they're like mastodon notifications. How about framing the question in user terms: Would you like Mastodon to connect notifications to a broader ran...
Loqi[Kevin Marks] @Gargron @0x1C3B00DA yes they do - there is a pattern of citation of blog URLs to refer to the blogger that goes back to the dawn of blogs - it's a very natural thing to do I wrote about this about 10 years ago: http://epeus.blogspot.co.uk/2008/01/ur...
aaronpkthat would also require less work on the part of the people i'm following, since their location would be updated automatically based on the contents of their posts instead of having to update their bio
aaronpksingpolyma: yes that's what i was getting at, except not limited to checkins, since other posts can have locations too, like photos tagged at a location
aaronpkhm yeah i think i'm gonna stick to my plan of extracting locations from h-entrys :) that seems to be much more consistent and widely implemented
Zegnatskippy, one of my addresses contains a post-office-box property, the other a street-address property. So theoretically you can programatically see which one of my addresses is postal and which is residential. But I don’t think anyone is doing anything like that.
tantek_only nest them if you want to show / represent multiple addresses with that information clustered per address, which is not the typical bio page or profile
ZegnatI am showing multiple adresses, so I would do it anyway. It might just be that I am so used to abstracting data to separate objects and addresses make perfect sense for that.
tantek_skippy - for microformats purposes, either of those tags work fine. Use the most appropriate HTML tag for the semantics in the markup. in this case div vs span is basically equivalent and you can pick based on what works in the context.
tantek_how not to POSSE, or how to piss-off Kevinmarks about images of text: https://www.instagram.com/overheardmarinasf/ (which for some reason is not on Twitter? their IG is literally what look like images of tweets!))