#dev 2018-05-05
2018-05-05 UTC
# edited /Webmention-faq (+456) "/* How do you know if a website uses webmentions? */ Idea webmentions" ( view diff)
[chrisaldrich] joined the channel
eli_oat and [manton] joined the channel
[kevinmarks] joined the channel
renem joined the channel
# ↩️ I've been on Mastodon for over a year, surrounded by alt-web types, and have heard *zero* mention of IndieWeb or Webmention.
I've heard active discussions of ActivityPub, the Fediverse, Scuttlebutt, blockchains, Diaspora, Xanadu, even *Gopher*.
Indieweb? Not a word. ( twitter.com/_/status/992581548938477570)
# ↩️ ActivityPub was developed in literally the same W3C group that Webmention and Micropub were standardized in ;-) btw why no website in your twitter bio? Where can I follow your fediverse posts? ( twitter.com/_/status/992590313234427904)
eli_oat joined the channel
eli_oat joined the channel
helo1, maingo, [tantek] and [chrisaldrich] joined the channel
# ↩️ Webmention is essentially trackbacks isn't it? The reason those died out was spam. I'm v skeptical about their solutions to that (eg Vouch), as they don't read as meaningfully scaling up to me. (Socially I mean.) ( twitter.com/_/status/992610846491664385)
tantek and jalcine joined the channel
snarfed, jalcine, jalcine_, dougbeal|mb1 and [eddie] joined the channel; Guest79677 left the channel
# edited /live_video (+145) "tantek added "[[live]] - watch live video from the current [[IndieWebCamp]], or the most recent recording from the most recent IndieWebCamp" to "See Also"" ( view diff)
[jeremycherfas], chrisaldrich, [chrisaldrich], tantek, calumryan, [pfefferle] and barpthewire joined the channel
# ↩️ No, it has verification built in, and some markup conventions to express likes, replies, rsvps etc. https://indieweb.org/Webmention-faq#Why_webmention_instead_of_Trackback ( twitter.com/_/status/992667830398128129)
# ↩️ My read is that it’s less trivial to spam than Pingback et al, but is “defeatable” by e.g. making a page with content “Buy Viagra!” followed by a zillion hyperlinks to target domains, then sending webmentions to all.
Vouch has promise, but seems untested, with open questions. ( twitter.com/_/status/992671419443089413)
calumryan and sebsel joined the channel
# ↩️ Trackback had a bad cost/benefit tradeoff, as it never showed much more than that a link had been made. Webmention is a lot closer to a twitter @ reply, and so has some of the drawbacks that they do. The difference is that the mitigation of them is under your control. ( twitter.com/_/status/992677325874622464)
# ↩️ I think you're thinking of pingbacks? Trackbacks had content. The only protocol diff I see is that Webmentions have you read the content from the URL with microformats, instead of embeding the content in the update… ( twitter.com/_/status/992677747787841536)
Zegnat[web] and tantek joined the channel
# ↩️ but they had to host content already for the url to have any value… it's literally no extra work… just putting the right tags in that page so that the spam content can be imported. It's _less_ work than implementing the Webmention protocol, which they have to do as well. ( twitter.com/_/status/992680743313653760)
calumryan, [jeremycherfas], swentel and KartikPrabhu joined the channel
# edited /Webmention-faq (+126) "/* Do webmentions work only when both sites use webmentions? */ Editing for clarity" ( view diff)
yatil joined the channel
yatil, [sebsel], iasai_, sebsel and Zegnat[web] joined the channel
# Webmention Rocks! https://abraham.link/484/webmention-rocks/ ( twitter.com/_/status/992721615015366656)
tantek, [sebsel] and yatil joined the channel
# moved /2018/Düsseldorf/Sessions to /2018/Düsseldorf/Schedule "Lets try and normalise on this page name."
sebsel and yatil joined the channel
# Read my May 5 Newsletter featuring “The Indieweb privacy challenge (Webmentions, silo backfeeds, and the GDPR) …” http://nzzl.us/vld1duX ( twitter.com/_/status/992738805001129984)
calumryan joined the channel
# Session about private posts / a permission layer for #webmentions at the @indiewebcamp Düsseldorf 2018 https://t.co/KwnQdbB3Hv ( twitter.com/_/status/992754726801477632)
iasai, yatil, calumryan and [tantek] joined the channel
sebsel, leg and iasai_ joined the channel
# @ReBeccaOrg @kevinmarks My read is that it’s less trivial to spam than Pingback et al, but is “defeatable” by e.g. making a page with content “Buy Viagra!” followed by a zillion hyperlinks to target domains, then sending webmentions to all. Vouch has promise, but seems untested, with open questions. ( twitter.com/_/status/992671419443089413)
# @kevinmarks @JmacDotOrg but they had to host content already for the url to have any value… it's literally no extra work… just putting the right tags in that page so that the spam content can be imported. It's _less_ work than implementing the Webmention protocol, which they have to do as well. ( twitter.com/_/status/992680743313653760)
[kim_landwehr] joined the channel
barpthewire, [tantek] and [eddie] joined the channel
[unoabraham] joined the channel
# ↩️ Crossposting to an IndieWeb friendly website shouldn’t be too hard to implement. Most use the W3C Rec for publishing: https://www.w3.org/TR/micropub/ It could even cover WordPress: https://github.com/snarfed/wordpress-micropub
(Hello from the IndieWeb chat, where this Twitter conversation popped up! 👋) ( twitter.com/_/status/992793305774723078)
AngeloGladding, [jeremycherfas], KartikPrabhu, [colinwalker], [miklb], snarfed, rotozeev and [chrisaldrich] joined the channel
# @aaronpk http://Webmention.io noob question. Is there anything bad someone could do with my access token? As in, should I be storing this outside my repo code? ( twitter.com/_/status/992839080374304768)
# ✌ @Reading "The Indieweb privacy challenge (Webmentions, silo backfeeds, and the GDPR)" http://ing.am/p/4Ynj ( twitter.com/_/status/992843543084494849)
leg, KartikPrabhu, davidmead, [colinwalker], maingo and renem joined the channel
yatil joined the channel
KartikPrabhu joined the channel
# ✌ @Reading "Reply to The Indieweb privacy challenge (Webmentions, silo backfeeds, and the GDPR) by Sebastian Grege…" http://ing.am/p/4Ynw ( twitter.com/_/status/992878748667170816)
[dgold] joined the channel
# GO ON. 🍿
"<warning>this is the point where this article shifts from user-centred design into privacy geekery and opinionated nitpicking ;)</warning>"
https://sebastiangreger.net/2018/05/indieweb-privacy-challenge-webmentions-backfeeds-gdpr/ ( twitter.com/_/status/992883313852473345)
snarfed joined the channel
leg joined the channel