#@matpacker↩️ Can I post the story to my website first, then syndicate through to @exposure, with backlinks and what-not recognising my site as the source? That would be boss! Support for IndieAuth, etc? (twitter.com/_/status/1017571325387288576)
#aaronpkStarting to really want Aperture to include full reply context in the timelines
#aaronpkI think it’s all of eddie’s reply posts that are doing it for me
#aaronpk And if I do that, then I might as well also start fetching posts from their own permalinks instead of just from the feeds, so that’s a lot of new things to think about on the backend
[eddie] joined the channel
#[eddie]Haha “oops?” Or “you’re welcome!” Whichever you feel is most appropriate 😆
[tantek] joined the channel
#[tantek][aaronpk] should we at least try to iterate on best practices for in-stream reply contexts?
#[tantek]Now that at least we have some (hopefully more than me) examples?
#aaronpkI’m not sure. I don’t really like the idea of relying on untrusted data like that
#aaronpkI think I’d rather do it right and fetch the data from the source
#aaronpkactvitypub solves this by including the signature of the original object so that you can trust that the person forwarding it on hasn’t faked it, but it seems easier to just fetch it from the source
snarfed, renem, matpacker, dougbeal|mb1 and tantek__ joined the channel
#tantek__hah just the fellow I signed-in to ask a q
#tantek__snafed, I tried posting a comment+tag in one post, a la https://indieweb.org/tag-reply#tag_and_comment and it didn't work as either. does Bridgy Publish only support u-tag-of OR u-in-reply-to but not both in one post?
#tantek__!tell snarfed in http://tantek.com/2018/193/t1/ I tried posting a comment+tag in one post a la https://indieweb.org/tag-reply#tag_and_comment (though without any tag/category markup), and it didn't work as either. does Bridgy Publish only support u-tag-of OR u-in-reply-to but not both in one post? (when I updated that post to only have u-in-reply-to, no u-tag-of, then it worked as a comment)
#LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "authorization header" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "authorization header is ____", a sentence describing the term)
#LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "http authorization" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "http authorization is ____", a sentence describing the term)
#ZegnatHmm, I thought we might already have something.
#Zegnatgetallheaders === apache_request_headers afaik. So there really is no difference in using those two. I do like your reason for testing $_SERVER first.
#ZegnatEitherway, I think the function is about as complete as you can make it without redundent getallheaders/apache_request_headers fallbacks
#GWGZegnat: I like to hope upstream is always improving
#GWGThat is why I only make my own function to do something that is already in the system if there is a compelling reason to do so
#[jgmac1106]Been talking with John Udell over at Hypothesis and he said it would be easy to use their API, strip down to html, and add back what I want, he just needs me to map it out
#[jgmac1106]would involve /bookmark/quotation/reply/highlight and every possible combination of those four plus an image reply or video reply to each. Which brings back to what would [tantek] say, "Just leave it as the HTML and stick an h-entry on the entire page. Done"
#ZegnatI am not sure what the end-goal is, [jgmac1106]?
#[jgmac1106]writng the post now, first priority is just figure out embedding and using annotations in other posts in the simplest way possible, skipping all indieweb stuff
#[jgmac1106]second priority, and I don't think it is smart, is to think about using annotations within a secondary piece from an IndieWeb perspective
#ZegnatYou mean annotations as in comments to specific parts of another article? I think KartikPrabhu was doing that, yes.
#[jgmac1106]yeah based on wiki it is a combination of bookmark+fragmention, but then I can get replies to that specific annotation which I think would just be /reply
#[jgmac1106]a photo or gif reply would just get u-photo
#ZegnatWell, anything could be used to reply to the annotation. Someone could chose to annotate your annotation. That’s just about what types of replies you want to handle on your site.
#[jgmac1106]which brings me back to just stick with an hentry on the entire page, but if I get free time I may experiment like you and I tried with citations, I finished the first two in the fork of the citation builder I found, need to get back to it. Test and share. Just a brutal writing month for me
#ZegnatDefinitely [jgmac1106]. Just start by posting annotations to your own site and see what you need to get that to work. Worry about more specific mf2 later. Own your data first
leg, [stefp], iasai__, [pfefferle], matpacker, [eddie], [jgmac1106], iasai and snarfed joined the channel
#@vincentlistensAdding Webmentions Support
First step to fully supporting Webmention on my blog completed!
I’m now pulling webmentions, likes and reposts on to the blog. I’ve also got PESOS working via my Micropub API and pulling Swarm Checkins in to the blog as well.
Lots more still to do. (twitter.com/_/status/1017793846485377026)
#Loqi[Kartik Prabhu] “but much to say about humanity”
nice thoughts on Minority Report and Artificial Intelligence. Sci-fi is best when it is not about the technology but about humans.
#KartikPrabhuthe bookmark link is fragmentioned. I might need to display the response-context better
#Loqisnarfed: tantek__ left you a message 11 hours, 2 minutes ago: in http://tantek.com/2018/193/t1/ I tried posting a comment+tag in one post a la https://indieweb.org/tag-reply#tag_and_comment (though without any tag/category markup), and it didn't work as either. does Bridgy Publish only support u-tag-of OR u-in-reply-to but not both in one post? (when I updated that post to only have u-in-reply-to, no u-tag-of, then it worked as a comment)
#snarfedsure, if you want to do two things, combining them in a single post may be more convenient. that logic applies in lots of cases. but doesn't make it make any more sense to me
#snarfedcreating issue + label is different than reply + label
#snarfedlots of existing precent for create + label. not much or any i know of for reply + label (or even other tags)
#snarfedmuch less obvious (or i expect common) use case, at least to me
#tantek__snarfed, I believe Flickr since they added #-hashtag support in description, comments
#tantek__as in if you put hashtags in a comment on a Flickr photo, you are simultaneously commenting and tagging the photo
#snarfedyeah? you can comment on flickr and simultaneously add a hashtag to the original photo? as a single action, in the comment? if so that's great precedent
#tantek__!tell snarfed there are two levels to it. at a minimum, the presence of u-tag-of should not nullify / cause the u-in-reply-to comment to fail to work with Bridgy Publish. then incrementally on top of that, it should handle *also* adding any p-category properties as labels
#tantek__Disqus << Criticism: 2017-07-27 [https://nicolas-hoizey.com/2017/07/so-long-disqus-hello-webmentions.html So long Disqus, hello Webmention] <blockquote>I’m fed up with Disqus. It’s been useful, easy to plug on this blog, but it’s a mess for web performance, and I don’t own my data, so… bye bye.</blockquote><blockquote>Disqus accounted for three quarters of the page weight!</blockquote>
#aaronpkI think I need to use a new account in aperture that has the 7-day limit because I think some people are having problems with it due to weird edge cases in some feeds
#aaronpkit's gonna take some digging, but I think what happens is someone adds a feed with almost no activity, then a week goes by so the entries are deleted, then the next time it polls it finds all those posts again and makes them show up again as unread
#Loqisnarfed: tantek__ left you a message 16 minutes ago: there are two levels to it. at a minimum, the presence of u-tag-of should not nullify / cause the u-in-reply-to comment to fail to work with Bridgy Publish. then incrementally on top of that, it should handle *also* adding any p-category properties as labels
#Loqi[snarfed] #771 original post discovery: handle sites with high post velocity better
#snarfedtantek__: oh absolutely. 500s are always bugs, full stop. i'm fixing that now.
#tantek__that'll be a big help because then I can start publishing reply-to + tag-of posts again without getting penalized, and then those can be used as examples for testing / analysis etc.
#tantek__I had to revert my (minimal) u-tag-of code because it was causing Bridgy Publish to fail
#snarfedheh. sorry! i'm deploying that bug fix in minutes
#snarfedactually yeah even regardless of the answer, the right fix for granary's format conversion is less obvious than i thought. it's going to take longer than minutes after all
#snarfedi'll get to it soon, but for now i'd recommend not bridgy publishing those combined posts, until i have a fix
#tantek__I'll leave the u-tag-of code disabled for now
#snarfedthe catch is that i have to convert to AS, and i don't know a reasonable way to represent a single AS activity that's both a reply and a tag at the same time
#snarfedanyway. i've made granary's internal AS1 handle "more" than strict AS1 before, eg making some fields like these multiply valued. i can do it again. it'll just take work.
#snarfed(switching to a different internal format is pretty out of scope though. that'd be a huge project.)
#Loqi[snarfed] #832 github publish: crash on reply post with tag-of
#tantek__snarfed, it's funny that AS assumed one activity type etc. when it's been clear here on a few occasions that things can be multityped in (user) practice
#tantek__I think AS2 even did away with the one-type assumption
#[kevinmarks]I think as1 assumed that you'd do facepile-like summaries for multiple actions
#tantek__kevinmarks, if only as1 had documented such design assumptions
TripFandango, [schmarty], snarfed, [jgmac1106] and dougbeal|mb1 joined the channel
#www.boffosocko.comedited /blogroll (+181) "/* Chris Aldrich */ fixed broken link and added link with additional information for WordPress" (view diff)
[eddie] joined the channel
#[eddie]I’m slowly build out a new “homepage” for my site, however it’s not a homepage yet. In fact, it’s not even publicly linked to, I’m just using it privately.
#[eddie]It looks horrible as it’s almost completely unstyled, and yet I’m amazed because it’s a view being handed directly from my backend server rather than being part of my Jekyll site which takes 20 minutes to rebuild. I keep being amazed when I do a new post and look at the page and suddenly it’s updated immediately. 😆 https://eddiehinkle.com/overview
#[eddie]And I’m even able to do things that would just be so difficult to do in Jekyll’s template, such as grab all the items I ate within 30 minutes of the most recent thing I ate (which seems weird, but then makes sense when you realize I log my sandwich and my chips separately)
#[eddie]Once I get off Jekyll I’m never going back to it for anything remotely complicated haha, simple sites only for Jekyll and me
#tantek__seriously there has to be a business model of, replicate "obvious" stuff Google etc. other BigCos are doing with crappy URLs, crappy markup, crappy bloated JS, except with clean URLs, minimal semantic markup, minimal progressive enhancement JS
#tantek__and you can be guaranteed no competition because everyone else is too afraid to build something in an area that Google already "owns"
#aaronpkflickr is ripe for this too. their website has been getting so slow full of js
#tantek__1. pick the crappiest "service" that Google "owns", rebuild it with clean/minimal URLs + markup + progressive enhancement JS.
#tantek__2. wait for people to gradually shift to your new cool thing, and Google's old thing to get filled with spam, neglected, and eventually shutdown
#aaronpktho I woudlnt try to take on flickr right now cause smugmug might actually fix things up now
#[eddie]I found the manually webmentions too much of a barrier to POSSE my GitHub stuff. But hopefully that is changed now with automatic webmentions :crossed_fingers:
#LoqiDesign is a catchall term used to refer to everything that affects users about a page/site including: Graphic design (including site icon) User interface design (UI design) User experience (UX) Information architecture (IA) URL design https://indieweb.org/design
#tantek__This is an excellent article on "separation of concerns" by adactio: https://adactio.com/journal/14103 and I think the way we design and assemble indieweb building blocks is consistent with his approach. wondering how we can document that in terms of "separation of concerns"
#LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "separation of concerns" yet. Would you like to create it?_ (Or just say "separation of concerns is ____", a sentence describing the term)
#LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "components" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "components is ____", a sentence describing the term)
#LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "modularity" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "modularity is ____", a sentence describing the term)
#tantek__difficult to define in the abstract absent any relevant indieweb context
#tantek__I think we have a principle similar to modularity
#KartikPrabhuright. It is more of a design principle