@matpacker↩️ Can I post the story to my website first, then syndicate through to @exposure, with backlinks and what-not recognising my site as the source? That would be boss! Support for IndieAuth, etc? (twitter.com/_/status/1017571325387288576)
aaronpk And if I do that, then I might as well also start fetching posts from their own permalinks instead of just from the feeds, so that’s a lot of new things to think about on the backend
aaronpkactvitypub solves this by including the signature of the original object so that you can trust that the person forwarding it on hasn’t faked it, but it seems easier to just fetch it from the source
snarfed, renem, matpacker, dougbeal|mb1 and tantek__ joined the channel
tantek__snafed, I tried posting a comment+tag in one post, a la https://indieweb.org/tag-reply#tag_and_comment and it didn't work as either. does Bridgy Publish only support u-tag-of OR u-in-reply-to but not both in one post?
tantek__!tell snarfed in http://tantek.com/2018/193/t1/ I tried posting a comment+tag in one post a la https://indieweb.org/tag-reply#tag_and_comment (though without any tag/category markup), and it didn't work as either. does Bridgy Publish only support u-tag-of OR u-in-reply-to but not both in one post? (when I updated that post to only have u-in-reply-to, no u-tag-of, then it worked as a comment)
LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "authorization header" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "authorization header is ____", a sentence describing the term)
LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "http authorization" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "http authorization is ____", a sentence describing the term)
Zegnatgetallheaders === apache_request_headers afaik. So there really is no difference in using those two. I do like your reason for testing $_SERVER first.
[jgmac1106]Been talking with John Udell over at Hypothesis and he said it would be easy to use their API, strip down to html, and add back what I want, he just needs me to map it out
[jgmac1106]would involve /bookmark/quotation/reply/highlight and every possible combination of those four plus an image reply or video reply to each. Which brings back to what would [tantek] say, "Just leave it as the HTML and stick an h-entry on the entire page. Done"
[jgmac1106]writng the post now, first priority is just figure out embedding and using annotations in other posts in the simplest way possible, skipping all indieweb stuff
[jgmac1106]yeah based on wiki it is a combination of bookmark+fragmention, but then I can get replies to that specific annotation which I think would just be /reply
ZegnatWell, anything could be used to reply to the annotation. Someone could chose to annotate your annotation. That’s just about what types of replies you want to handle on your site.
[jgmac1106]which brings me back to just stick with an hentry on the entire page, but if I get free time I may experiment like you and I tried with citations, I finished the first two in the fork of the citation builder I found, need to get back to it. Test and share. Just a brutal writing month for me
ZegnatDefinitely [jgmac1106]. Just start by posting annotations to your own site and see what you need to get that to work. Worry about more specific mf2 later. Own your data first
leg, [stefp], iasai__, [pfefferle], matpacker, [eddie], [jgmac1106], iasai and snarfed joined the channel
@vincentlistensAdding Webmentions Support
First step to fully supporting Webmention on my blog completed!
I’m now pulling webmentions, likes and reposts on to the blog. I’ve also got PESOS working via my Micropub API and pulling Swarm Checkins in to the blog as well.
Lots more still to do. (twitter.com/_/status/1017793846485377026)
Loqi[Kartik Prabhu] “but much to say about humanity”
nice thoughts on Minority Report and Artificial Intelligence. Sci-fi is best when it is not about the technology but about humans.
Loqisnarfed: tantek__ left you a message 11 hours, 2 minutes ago: in http://tantek.com/2018/193/t1/ I tried posting a comment+tag in one post a la https://indieweb.org/tag-reply#tag_and_comment (though without any tag/category markup), and it didn't work as either. does Bridgy Publish only support u-tag-of OR u-in-reply-to but not both in one post? (when I updated that post to only have u-in-reply-to, no u-tag-of, then it worked as a comment)
snarfedsure, if you want to do two things, combining them in a single post may be more convenient. that logic applies in lots of cases. but doesn't make it make any more sense to me
snarfedyeah? you can comment on flickr and simultaneously add a hashtag to the original photo? as a single action, in the comment? if so that's great precedent
tantek__!tell snarfed there are two levels to it. at a minimum, the presence of u-tag-of should not nullify / cause the u-in-reply-to comment to fail to work with Bridgy Publish. then incrementally on top of that, it should handle *also* adding any p-category properties as labels
tantek__Disqus << Criticism: 2017-07-27 [https://nicolas-hoizey.com/2017/07/so-long-disqus-hello-webmentions.html So long Disqus, hello Webmention] <blockquote>I’m fed up with Disqus. It’s been useful, easy to plug on this blog, but it’s a mess for web performance, and I don’t own my data, so… bye bye.</blockquote><blockquote>Disqus accounted for three quarters of the page weight!</blockquote>
aaronpkI think I need to use a new account in aperture that has the 7-day limit because I think some people are having problems with it due to weird edge cases in some feeds
aaronpkit's gonna take some digging, but I think what happens is someone adds a feed with almost no activity, then a week goes by so the entries are deleted, then the next time it polls it finds all those posts again and makes them show up again as unread
Loqisnarfed: tantek__ left you a message 16 minutes ago: there are two levels to it. at a minimum, the presence of u-tag-of should not nullify / cause the u-in-reply-to comment to fail to work with Bridgy Publish. then incrementally on top of that, it should handle *also* adding any p-category properties as labels
tantek__that'll be a big help because then I can start publishing reply-to + tag-of posts again without getting penalized, and then those can be used as examples for testing / analysis etc.
snarfedactually yeah even regardless of the answer, the right fix for granary's format conversion is less obvious than i thought. it's going to take longer than minutes after all
snarfedthe catch is that i have to convert to AS, and i don't know a reasonable way to represent a single AS activity that's both a reply and a tag at the same time
snarfedanyway. i've made granary's internal AS1 handle "more" than strict AS1 before, eg making some fields like these multiply valued. i can do it again. it'll just take work.
tantek__snarfed, it's funny that AS assumed one activity type etc. when it's been clear here on a few occasions that things can be multityped in (user) practice
[eddie]I’m slowly build out a new “homepage” for my site, however it’s not a homepage yet. In fact, it’s not even publicly linked to, I’m just using it privately.
[eddie]It looks horrible as it’s almost completely unstyled, and yet I’m amazed because it’s a view being handed directly from my backend server rather than being part of my Jekyll site which takes 20 minutes to rebuild. I keep being amazed when I do a new post and look at the page and suddenly it’s updated immediately. 😆 https://eddiehinkle.com/overview
[eddie]And I’m even able to do things that would just be so difficult to do in Jekyll’s template, such as grab all the items I ate within 30 minutes of the most recent thing I ate (which seems weird, but then makes sense when you realize I log my sandwich and my chips separately)
tantek__seriously there has to be a business model of, replicate "obvious" stuff Google etc. other BigCos are doing with crappy URLs, crappy markup, crappy bloated JS, except with clean URLs, minimal semantic markup, minimal progressive enhancement JS
tantek__2. wait for people to gradually shift to your new cool thing, and Google's old thing to get filled with spam, neglected, and eventually shutdown
[eddie]I found the manually webmentions too much of a barrier to POSSE my GitHub stuff. But hopefully that is changed now with automatic webmentions :crossed_fingers:
LoqiDesign is a catchall term used to refer to everything that affects users about a page/site including: Graphic design (including site icon) User interface design (UI design) User experience (UX) Information architecture (IA) URL design https://indieweb.org/design
tantek__This is an excellent article on "separation of concerns" by adactio: https://adactio.com/journal/14103 and I think the way we design and assemble indieweb building blocks is consistent with his approach. wondering how we can document that in terms of "separation of concerns"
LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "separation of concerns" yet. Would you like to create it?_ (Or just say "separation of concerns is ____", a sentence describing the term)
LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "components" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "components is ____", a sentence describing the term)
LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "modularity" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "modularity is ____", a sentence describing the term)