#LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "multitags" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "multitags is ____", a sentence describing the term)
#LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "multitag" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "multitag is ____", a sentence describing the term)
#kisik21I thought of a clever idea of encoding data as plain text and then passing a hash with it. If the data is tampered with, I easily notice. And nobody can pass me another hash without knowing a little secret!
#kisik21The secret is stored in the config file and closely guarded.
#[eddie]Oh oops, it’s obviously too late, it’s set up as an or
#[tantek]I think refinement (ands) is a more common case than unions (or), simply because you can "just" open multiple tabs to look at such unions, but a refinement can only work with explicit support
jjuran and cweiske joined the channel
#kisik21gRegorLove: what's up with your webmentions? You don't seem to be advertising an endpoint (but I have passed your challenge of mentioning you with getting your h-card!)
#kisik21But now I can pass the mentioning challenge, yay! Now maybe private posts?
#gRegorLoveThere's an HTTP Link header for it. I'll have to check on why no <link> element currently; don't recall if I removed that for some reason.
#kisik21gRegorLove: you should get one since my implementation currently doesn't look at link headers (but it should probably!)
#kisik21but your name is now on my page because your h-card is now fetchable in my code!
iasai and [kevinmarks] joined the channel
#[kevinmarks]Refinement versus unions varies depending on the commonness of each term. If the intersection is empty, then the union is more useful. If one is super common, then the other is a good refinement.
#[kevinmarks]The other thing that is handy is looking at which tags co-occur. That can be useful for further expansion if they found a rarer term with a more common one attached.
[jgmac1106], iasai and [pfefferle] joined the channel
#ZegnatIf you want to go really fancy you could do both. Use comma for or, and slash for and. E.g. /tag/tech,indieweb lists all posts that have either tech or indieweb tags. If I want to refine that to only indieweb and tech posts that mention PHP I make it /tag/tech,indieweb/php
#ZegnatThough I am not 100% sure what the usecase is :P
#[jgmac1106]Yeah look at the WP query I sent for ideas.... Can build the craziest search parameters into a url string
#[jgmac1106]tag/tech+indieweb to me says has to have both
#ZegnatI would concur with [kevinmarks] and try to stay away from + signs in URLs
[kevinmarks] joined the channel
#[kevinmarks]historical anecdote: Technorati tags allowed spaces. We also fetched tags results from delicious to show on our tag info page
#[kevinmarks]however, the spaces were encoded to + in URLs (as was the fashion at the time)
#[kevinmarks]delicious didn't allow spaces, and treated + in a tag url as an AND query
#[kevinmarks]we massively loaded their database by doing this and Joshua got very cross with me.
#[kevinmarks]So Technorati mapped the space in tags to an underscore for delicious
#jeremycherfas!tell GWG there was an interesting discussion on location at IWC Nuremberg, and the use of, I think, a Google system that allows you to specify the area of interest from very large to very small. Maybe zegnat can remember it.
#LoqiGWG: jeremycherfas left you a message 3 minutes ago: there was an interesting discussion on location at IWC Nuremberg, and the use of, I think, a Google system that allows you to specify the area of interest from very large to very small. Maybe zegnat can remember it.
#GWGBut my dreams probably outreach what I actually will build
#jeremycherfasSo you were. Thanks for jogging my memory.
#kisik21!tell [eddie] your comments are doubled up because something's wron with your twitter syndication process. Same is on aaronpk's website, where my comments are shown with the birdsite syndication link below. Maybe webmention.io is to blame?
#[schmarty]kisik21: many folks that show webmentions don't have any kind of de-duplication, so a response from your site and a response from you on Twitter are treated as two separate responses
#[schmarty](Or I could be misreading what you're describing)
jeremyc__, iasai, tbbrown and KartikPrabhu joined the channel
#[eddie]Zegnat interesting url thoughts. I had brought up /tech/php but tantek was concerned about potential pagination issues
#[eddie]I would love for us to have a standard expectation for both AND tags and OR tags
#[eddie]kisik21 If I read that right, my and aaronpk's comments show up twice on your website? It's probably because I syndicate all my content to twitter so you get both my indieweb webmention and the twitter syndication response
#[eddie]You should be able to de-duplicate the responses by checking for the source url
#[eddie]and only display one copy of the same source url response
#aaronpkwhen i get a webmention from eddiehinkle.com I also store any u-syndication URLs it claims. then when i get a mention from bridgy for a tweet, i can see that the canonical was already received from eddiehinkle.com
#[eddie]My biggest thing holding me back was jekyll (because of the way I had it set up) Now that I'm using my own node.js rendering engine, I should be able to open and resave a post. Essentially the one thing that's holding me back is updating a post, I have to get that internal logic built out. Once I get that then when bridgy returns the syndication url from my webmentions I can update the post with the correct urls
swentel joined the channel
#[tantek]I believe I send webmentions *after* POSSEing for just this reason
#[tantek]So when someone receives a Webmention from me, and retrieved my post, it already has all the automated u-syndication links in it. (IG POSSEing & syndication links still manual and sometimes not til hours later)
leg, [schmarty], gRegorLove_, [kevinmarks] and iasai joined the channel
#[jgmac1106]so can I embed an h-feed, and then a set of h-entries for each badge recipient so I could just make a recipients section instead of one page per badge issued?
#[jgmac1106]so I can do single file webmention badges from the wiki now, but can't out the way no to display all the u-reply-of in the content obviously. In terms of a wiki would be better to have each badge a page and a list of recipients or some type of template:badge and use one file per badge
#Zegnat[jgmac1106], the problem with the wiki is that the editable area is all marked as the content, so you are always putting the reply-to urls within the page content.
#jgmac1106yeah which leaves me to one page per issuance
#jgmac1106and marking all issuances as a collection
#Zegnatnot really, that would still put the link in there
#ZegnatOr are you saying you don’t mind the link being part of the badge content, just not multiple links?
#jgmac1106I want the link the way it showed on my page would be fine…might set the badge as the h-card u-photo….to cheat
#ZegnatRather than doing that I would file issues for photo replies
#ZegnatPRoblem with those cheats is that they stick around
#[jgmac1106]yeah...for now will leave it as the u-featured img
#[jgmac1106]Kind of makes sense for me to choose to display the img back on my badges page
#Loqifeatured is a proposed mf2 property (typically as u-featured) for h-entry that indicates a representative image for a primarily textual post https://indieweb.org/featured
#[jgmac1106]hmm guess it isn't primarily textual...u-photo would make more sense
#ZegnatFeatured images are like those nice little hand-drawn-style images on A List Apart, or the big screenfilling images behind the post title on Medium. I tend to see them more as an illustrative addition to a post, possibly representing a post among other posts. They do not tend to be actual content.
#ZegnatFor badges I imagine the image is supposed to be the content, which would be a photo post
#jgmac1106yeah [sknebel] forgot about Kaja….seems each issuance woudl be its own wiki page…is that too much for a wiki…be baack later
[matpacker] joined the channel
#sknebelbit confused by the category things - seems like you meant to make those properties instead of categories called that?
#ZegnatWiki doesn’t really care how many pages it has. I’d like to see all the “issuances” of the same badge on one page, fun way to see who has them. Just not sure *our* wiki has a simple way of supporting that
iasai and [tantek] joined the channel
#jgmac1106well then you syndicate a badge post to the badge page and the badge post sends the webmention
#[tantek]aaronpk, jgmac1106, zegnat, re: the wiki auto sending webmentions etc., see the Wikipedia indieweb projects also — ideally we'd prototype this functionality and get it working on the IndieWeb wiki before Wikipedia: https://indieweb.org/MediaWiki#Building_Block_Proposals
#jgmac1106Yeah I was experimenting there, <span p=“p-category”>criteria</span> would have parsed better
#jgmac1106sknebel I was trying to copy the way gRegorLove uses states on read posts…but <data class="p-category" value="$">$name </data> doesn’t parse as well
#sknebelbut you want those to be text, not just a few states, right?
#sknebelso using categories doesn't seem to make much sense?
snarfed and [kevinmarks] joined the channel
#[kevinmarks]Should we have a u-featured image for a feed or person?
#[kevinmarks]Given that twitter/mastodon/Facebook/g+ have an equivalent
#[kevinmarks]Or should that be u-banner or something?
#[kevinmarks]I think it belongs to the feed, but mastodon seems to associate it with the author
#GWGThat would be if it was in the author property, wouldn't it
#jgmac1106[skenbel] hat I really want is p-criteria and p-evidence so I would be able to quikcly parse and sort through posts…but trying to do this with existing properties
#jgmac1106trying to figure out away that when I scan a parsed badge I will see the critera and evidence all nicely nested like
#jgmac1106I am also wondering if a badge should be an h-review and not an h-entry
#[jgmac1106][kevinmarks] do you mean the banner img behind someone's avatr. I would call that the u-featured of an author property....or just the u-featured of that page