#[keithjgrant]The problem with working fully open source now (I just started at Red Hat!): I now miss Github notifications for my own projects amid the flood
#ZegnatProbably something like what cweiske said. Or possibly even specific scrapers. I forget the biblio tool’s name, but sknebel once linked me to a repo full of context extractors for websites without specific mf2/ogp/json-ld markup
#[jgmac1106]Not for Pdfs but that is what Jacky was working on all weekend... Reliably extracting author
#ZegnatOh, yeah, there was this pretty big project for it. Trying to find it again... may have been part of Zotero..? I am going to spent another 10 minutes looking, else sknebel will probably just know when he turns up after work
#Zegnat!tell jacky for extracting author (and more) from all sorts of pages you may want to look at some prior art here: https://github.com/zotero/translators - basically extractors for different websites!
#ZegnatPretty interesting, has specific extractors for several newspaper websites. I thought about looking into porting some of those to XRay (and thus Loqi) but didn’t feel like XRay was extendible enough
iasai, KartikPrabhu, jackjamieson, [jgmac1106], [cleverdevil] and [manton] joined the channel
#[manton]Hi everyone! I've been adding drafts and q=source support to Micro.blog's Micropub endpoint and the native client apps. One thing I'm realizing... If you save a draft in the Mac app using a home-grown Micropub endpoint that doesn't support drafts, it will likely just get published. Is this something we should worry about, or are folks in this situation just kind of on their own to know what features their server supports?
#[manton]I mentioned this in a GitHub thread, but I think it would be helpful to roll together several of the newer Micropub extensions into the official spec, almost like a "version 2" (except backwards compatible and not actually versioned) so that it's easier to talk about what features a client/server supports.
#[cleverdevil]IMO, its probably fine for now, but you may want to pop up a warning for users that are publishing to custom endpoints.
#[Rose]I agree with [cleverdevil]. It would also be great to have a documentation page of "these endpoints support this" for people to check, so the WordPress plugin, naturally micro.blog, etc., are all listed there.
#[manton][Rose] Good point. The wiki has some information about implementations, but I think everything is a little too scattered right now... To understand Micropub, you need to read 3 things: the spec, the wiki, and GitHub. https://indieweb.org/Micropub-extensions#Query_for_Post_List
snarfed joined the channel
#[cleverdevil]That said, I think that `q=config` should be updated to include more.
#[Rose]I would think this should be microblog first documentation as it's features in your apps?
#[Rose]Not saying we don't need to improve documentation elsewhere, but for your primary target audience (I suspect), that's going to be key. Lots of them don't really know about IW or understand this stuff. Of course, if they're all hosted with you or on WordPress, or savvy enough to know what works then that's ok, but documenting it on your end would be good too.
#[manton]I'm definitely going to update my documentation. But yeah, this is a non-issue for anyone hosting their blog on Micro.blog. It's only an issue with Micropub servers that I haven't tested against (which is most).
#ZegnatCouldn’t you syndicate to micro.blog by copying the micropub request to the mb endpoint, GWG? If I do not misremember, a micropub request also as the ability to give you back the final URL (location header?) so you can then automatically link to it
#sknebelZegnat: I don't think blogs not hosted on mb have an endpoint there?
#ZegnatOoh, is that the thing. So syndication isn’t really the action of syndicating here, but the action of requesting mb to check for new content to mirror?
#ZegnatApparently my mind has different mental mappings for those two flows :P
iasai, jackjamieson and [manton] joined the channel
#[manton]Yeah, "syndicating" to Micro.blog is a little different because you don't have to do anything. It just reads your feeds. But that means there's no obvious place to discover a Micro.blog permalink for your post, which also includes the conversation. I think the plan was for M.b to also send a Webmention to your blog, passing along that permalink.
#KartikPrabhulot of the use-cases which overload webmention are actually micorpub use-cases
[jgmac1106] joined the channel
#ZegnatIf the mb entry includes a link to the original, sending a webmention is totally legit though, because it does include a link
[asuh] joined the channel
#ZegnatIf the mb entry includes <a href="" rel="canonical">Original</a>, and then sends a webmention to the canonical entry, through /original-post-discovery the webmention receiver should be able to extract the canonical URL. And if that matches a post the receiver controls it could automatically update it with a u-syndication link to the mb entry.
#[manton][Zegnat] It does include a link to the original, but I don't think it includes rel=canonical. That's a good idea.
#ZegnatThat wouldn’t solve the triggering GWG was discussing. But it could enable mb sending a webmention once a post is live and the original source automatically listing it as a syndication copy :)
#ZegnatAlthough thinking about it, while mb could support some sort of webhook, isn’t that what websub is? (A webhook for the original publisher to post to.)
#ZegnatSo I feel like it could be: WordPress publishes to feed, triggers websub, mb is subscribed through websub and gets the post, mb processes the post and publishes it with a rel-canonical, mb sends a webmention to the origin post notifying the author of the succesful syndication.
#ZegnatNote that basically none of those steps introduce new tech. Only /original-post-discovery is newish in there for the origin to recognise the syndication.
#sknebelor add MP and the site can make an MP request and learn the URL in the response
#ZegnatThat would make sense, but I am not sure the syndication-type micro.blog feeds are supposed to be used for standalone blogging? So maybe mp posts to it do not make sense?
[tantek] joined the channel
#[manton]Micro.blog does support WebSub as you described too, although I don't think it's used often or well-tested.
#[manton]For feeds, the idea is absolutely to use regular, existing blog feeds. Some people use specialized feeds but that isn't required.
#[tantek]Has anyone actually had an original post change meaning after they've replied to it? How often? Once a year? A month? Would be quite surprised if it's any more than that.
#[tantek](re: all the what's the use-case for signatures discussions over the weekend)
dougbeal|mb1, [jgmac1106] and [cleverdevil] joined the channel
#GWGZegnat, to your earlier question re micro.blog, yes
#aaronpkI've definitely had original posts disappear, most often due to domain name lapses
#GWGI just want to be able to easily link to micro.blog posts from their original posts and finer tune what goes there
#[eddie]Also [manton] and [cleverdevil] it would be interesting to pair up a bunch of extensions as a "Micropub update package", but also a query for supported extensions also exists as a proposed extension here: https://github.com/indieweb/micropub-extensions/issues/7
#[eddie]tantek: Correct, I don't think anyone really felt like there was a valid use-case for the signatures discussion except the person investigating the signatures
#Loqimanton has 27 karma in this channel over the last year (65 in all channels)
#[jgmac1106]eddie....right after that conversation I met with one the artist where I am building an IndieWeb emcommerce store, we are working on a webmention "certificate of authority" he wanted to sign it....I am just going to use an img of signature..the url is the signature
#[eddie][jgmac1106] are you talking about a physical signature or a digital certification signature? I'm confused
#[jgmac1106]Just a physical... I thought digital signature to be legit... But resized noone would care... Ideally would be an image of a signature carrying digital certification but that felt like overkill
#[jgmac1106]A webmention from an artist saying you own X piece since Y date is enough IMO... Putting in the pic of signature bc customers want ir
#[jgmac1106]Realized not resized... Have no idea if neurons resize when you realize
#sknebeland given the number of dead links you encounter when reading about art that's less than 5 years old, yeah I'd want something more permanent (like paper) if there's actual value attached to it
#LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "phparch" yet. Would you like to create it?_ (Or just say "phparch is ____", a sentence describing the term)
#LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "php[architect]" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "php[architect] is ____", a sentence describing the term)
#LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "php architect" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "php architect is ____", a sentence describing the term)
#[tantek]php architect is a magazine about [[PHP]] that featured the IndieWeb on the cover of its March 2019 issue as well as in an article on page 17.
#LoqiPersonal Democracy Forum is (often abbreviated PDF) an annual conference in New York City, NY since 2004, where Tantek Çelik gave an IndieWeb talk in 2014, and has a goal of nurturing "a world-wide conversation about technology’s impact on government, politics, media, and democratic societies" https://indieweb.org/Personal_Democracy_Forum
iasai, [Rose], swentel, chrisaldrich, MorningMoon, tbbrown and KartikPrabhu joined the channel